Keeping coolant and transmission temps under control when towing in the summer heat

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
Geotrash

Geotrash

Dave
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
5,482
Reaction score
12,961
Location
Richmond, VA
So I misspoke earlier, my 2012 is actually five blade fans, and that’s what I ordered as well to go with the 700 W fan motor. There are no markings for part numbers on either the fan or the motor.

88AB2FD8-5B86-4EDD-B173-15C464D1FC6B.jpeg
39FC7B4F-4D26-4BBF-8D34-FF0EB6FA9211.jpeg
18E0381D-2081-4662-8E7B-07E93171A164.jpeg
 
Last edited:

mikeyss

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Posts
1,611
Reaction score
3,001
Location
Longmont, Colorado.
I need to get that fancy cfm reader, since I have both the 5/5 rimless AND I have the 7/9 rimmed in the truck. Both are 700w motors. Any recommendations for a cfm reader?
 

alpha_omega

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
1,324
Location
Michigan
Well my '10 has had the fans and passenger side harness repaired

Information I have confirmed on my PPV
- Passenger side harness connector replaced
- Fan shroud assembly, Part # 84302502
- Both fan blade assemblies are 5 blade (rimless)

I just need figure out:
1) Do I just keep the current fan blade assemblies and go with the 700w motors - GM Part 20903474?
2) Add RPO coded "KW5" 220amp alternator - GM part 22949466
3) Explore fan speed settings in HP Tuners and possible alter
What is your current alternator Kilo code? My 11’ has KW1.
 

alpha_omega

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
1,324
Location
Michigan
I need to get that fancy cfm reader, since I have both the 5/5 rimless AND I have the 7/9 rimmed in the truck. Both are 700w motors. Any recommendations for a cfm reader?
Any of the “BT Meters” are good quality for what you’re trying to do. I have one that’s a bit nicer but we use it for when we are jumping. That one is not used for doing stuff like this, which is why I picked up the BT-100.

Is your alternator code the same for those 5 blades?
 

alpha_omega

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
1,324
Location
Michigan
Two hours later I finished this reply. My apologies for the hijack and may the force be with you while reading.

Still on board after the warning? Ok then, buckle up…here we go!

All the research I found shows that the 20903474 Motor is for the 5.3l Yukon’s and not the 6.2l. Are you sure that is the right number for the application? I couldn’t see GM wasting money putting in a 700W motor for no reason, unless it’s the actual physics behind their choice that was then swayed or became convoluted when it came time to make a decision on the 6.2l cooling system (I know, I know…you can bust the docs balls later on “another physics reference” - hey I warned you ahead of time).
What I mean by ”actual physics”: It is quite possible the 5 blade needs the 700w motor because it needs to spin faster in order to run as efficient (more low pressure due to more space between each blade) as the 7/9. By increasing the number of blades you effectively decrease the space between the blades and in turn decrease the amount of low pressure - aka the air that is not being drawn through the cooler/condenser/radiator and pushed by the blades towards your engine. If the fan has a bigger overall diameter, or thicker fan blades, this idea goes out the window, because in this case the impeller used to rotate the fan would need to be larger. Although, this still does not mean that a fan with more blades will have more airflow, only that it will have a higher energy consumption and make less auditory noise.
If the fan was a push style instead of a pull style setup, the fan(s) would run on high nearly full-time. This is because the air being moved by the blades would constantly fight against [not only] the static pressure of the vehicles cooling components, but also the resistant pressure of the incoming headwind while driving; plus while at idle they would be on due to ambient air temps/realfeel temps/atmospheric temps and from the engine, trans, tires, road…etc.
Since our vehicles use a pull style setup the fans usually kick on when the vehicle is at idle, slow moving/stop-and-go traffic, or grade increases (esp while towing). Static pressures are the same, but with the pull style you have to add the closed engine bay and engine into account - plus anything that hinders or impedes the outflow of airflow. Also, outside temps obviously play a role, but let’s get back on track.

So, with an increased number of blades using the same size or a similar diameter fan you will only:

-decrease the sound of the air being moved by decreasing the amount of negative pressure (more blades = less sound / less blades = more sound *think rotor wing aircraft and how much sound a helicopter produces from its blades “chopping” the air - that chop is the negative pressure)

-increase the high pressure air being moved (relative to the static pressures around it).

-increase the energy consumption, but not increase the airflow proportionate to the energy consumption *meaning less efficient (which I believe is not what you guys are aiming for correct?).
You’re not trying to put in a bigger alternator, fan blades and a bigger fan motor in just to move a little more air. Instead, you’re trying to move VOLUME!, which can only happen if their are less fan blades (low pressure), or if they are MUCH thicker (usually) and/or if the fan is much larger in diameter overall.
Even with the latter being the case, you shouldn’t need larger fan motors and alternators because the airflow (cfm) would then be higher than that of a smaller fan running at the same RPM. This does not follow the rules or apply to us because as I mentioned earlier, we have SUV’s with large hot engines that are too close to the fans.

To not let this reply get any longer, check out this paper on the subject. I checked their work, the numbers are right but they are also subjective, and unfortunately their conclusions are not realistic to our circumstances. However, the information is solid and might help fill in any blanks left by my ramblings above.

*I want to go on record and state that I am not responsible for any headaches or further confusion caused by trying to understand the equations in this paper - skip over them, I’ve already ensured they are correct.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19942060.2013.11015454
 

alpha_omega

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Posts
692
Reaction score
1,324
Location
Michigan
In relation to my long post, this idea hit me while I was sleeping.

I’m not sure if you guys will have any low pressure issues with your fans or engine temp spikes that are the result of opening the air dam at the lower grille. This could prevent the fans from working at their peak performance regardless of their size and how big of a motor/alternator combo that you use. Just a thought. I don’t want to see you trade trans temps for engine temps, and thinking that you moved the aux trans cooler to help prevent static pressure but result in an increased low pressure as a result.
 

RooTBeeRthe1st

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2018
Posts
1,020
Reaction score
2,346
Any of the “BT Meters” are good quality for what you’re trying to do. I have one that’s a bit nicer but we use it for when we are jumping. That one is not used for doing stuff like this, which is why I picked up the BT-100.

Is your alternator code the same for those 5 blades?
My build sheetScreenshot_20210725-062552.png
 
OP
OP
Geotrash

Geotrash

Dave
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
5,482
Reaction score
12,961
Location
Richmond, VA
In relation to my long post, this idea hit me while I was sleeping.

I’m not sure if you guys will have any low pressure issues with your fans or engine temp spikes that are the result of opening the air dam at the lower grille. This could prevent the fans from working at their peak performance regardless of their size and how big of a motor/alternator combo that you use. Just a thought. I don’t want to see you trade trans temps for engine temps, and thinking that you moved the aux trans cooler to help prevent static pressure but result in an increased low pressure as a result.
A fair concern, for sure. However, the area above and below the bumper are isolated from each other by the thick plastic splash shield that runs from just below the radiator to the frame crossmember beneath the harmonic balancer.
 
OP
OP
Geotrash

Geotrash

Dave
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
5,482
Reaction score
12,961
Location
Richmond, VA
Two hours later I finished this reply. My apologies for the hijack and may the force be with you while reading.

Still on board after the warning? Ok then, buckle up…here we go!

All the research I found shows that the 20903474 Motor is for the 5.3l Yukon’s and not the 6.2l. Are you sure that is the right number for the application? I couldn’t see GM wasting money putting in a 700W motor for no reason, unless it’s the actual physics behind their choice that was then swayed or became convoluted when it came time to make a decision on the 6.2l cooling system (I know, I know…you can bust the docs balls later on “another physics reference” - hey I warned you ahead of time).
What I mean by ”actual physics”: It is quite possible the 5 blade needs the 700w motor because it needs to spin faster in order to run as efficient (more low pressure due to more space between each blade) as the 7/9. By increasing the number of blades you effectively decrease the space between the blades and in turn decrease the amount of low pressure - aka the air that is not being drawn through the cooler/condenser/radiator and pushed by the blades towards your engine. If the fan has a bigger overall diameter, or thicker fan blades, this idea goes out the window, because in this case the impeller used to rotate the fan would need to be larger. Although, this still does not mean that a fan with more blades will have more airflow, only that it will have a higher energy consumption and make less auditory noise.
If the fan was a push style instead of a pull style setup, the fan(s) would run on high nearly full-time. This is because the air being moved by the blades would constantly fight against [not only] the static pressure of the vehicles cooling components, but also the resistant pressure of the incoming headwind while driving; plus while at idle they would be on due to ambient air temps/realfeel temps/atmospheric temps and from the engine, trans, tires, road…etc.
Since our vehicles use a pull style setup the fans usually kick on when the vehicle is at idle, slow moving/stop-and-go traffic, or grade increases (esp while towing). Static pressures are the same, but with the pull style you have to add the closed engine bay and engine into account - plus anything that hinders or impedes the outflow of airflow. Also, outside temps obviously play a role, but let’s get back on track.

So, with an increased number of blades using the same size or a similar diameter fan you will only:

-decrease the sound of the air being moved by decreasing the amount of negative pressure (more blades = less sound / less blades = more sound *think rotor wing aircraft and how much sound a helicopter produces from its blades “chopping” the air - that chop is the negative pressure)

-increase the high pressure air being moved (relative to the static pressures around it).

-increase the energy consumption, but not increase the airflow proportionate to the energy consumption *meaning less efficient (which I believe is not what you guys are aiming for correct?).
You’re not trying to put in a bigger alternator, fan blades and a bigger fan motor in just to move a little more air. Instead, you’re trying to move VOLUME!, which can only happen if their are less fan blades (low pressure), or if they are MUCH thicker (usually) and/or if the fan is much larger in diameter overall.
Even with the latter being the case, you shouldn’t need larger fan motors and alternators because the airflow (cfm) would then be higher than that of a smaller fan running at the same RPM. This does not follow the rules or apply to us because as I mentioned earlier, we have SUV’s with large hot engines that are too close to the fans.

To not let this reply get any longer, check out this paper on the subject. I checked their work, the numbers are right but they are also subjective, and unfortunately their conclusions are not realistic to our circumstances. However, the information is solid and might help fill in any blanks left by my ramblings above.

*I want to go on record and state that I am not responsible for any headaches or further confusion caused by trying to understand the equations in this paper - skip over them, I’ve already ensured they are correct.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19942060.2013.11015454
Made it through! One thing that comes to mind is that I have no way to know that my 2012 doesn’t already have 700w fan motors even though it doesn’t list the K5L cooling package. It does have 5 bladed fans and it has the heavy duty towing package, as evidenced by the factory trailer brake controller, engine and transmission oil coolers and the power steering fluid cooler.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
128,781
Posts
1,805,301
Members
91,760
Latest member
MyCleftNut

Latest posts

Top