My From Start to Finish 6.0L Build

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
My block arrived this afternoon. The block looks clean and refurbished correctly. Checked the cylinders and they are correctly bored to 4.03" with great crass hatching. All flat surfaces have been cleaned and properly machined. Getting closer.
pic01.jpg

pic02.jpg

Pic 1.jpg

pic 2.jpg
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
So last Friday I completely inspected and measured key components of this block and everything was super clean, outside painted nicely, preserved and the flat surfaces were measured to be flat. The bores of the cylinders were nicely honed and the bores were measured to be 4.03". Additionally, I was going over my notes and reviewing my Rotating Assembly order and realized I somehow ordered my crankshaft with a 58x reluctor wheel vice the 24x. Called them up and they were able to make that change for me. Glad I stumbled across this error before the rotating assembly was delivered.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
So last Friday I completely inspected and measured key components of this block and everything was super clean, outside painted nicely, preserved and the flat surfaces were measured to be flat. The bores of the cylinders were nicely honed and the bores were measured to be 4.03". Additionally, I was going over my notes and reviewing my Rotating Assembly order and realized I somehow ordered my crankshaft with a 58x reluctor wheel vice the 24x. Called them up and they were able to make that change for me. Glad I stumbled across this error before the rotating assembly was delivered.
Good catch.:happy107:
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
Now researching, finding and procuring the required gaskets for this build. One thing I'm unsure of is the head gasket and the slightly larger bore.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
Now researching, finding and procuring the required gaskets for this build. One thing I'm unsure of is the head gasket and the slightly larger bore.
Do you have a good LS Series engine build book? I bought this one on recommendation of a member here. It’s got a section on head gaskets. I know you need to determine thickness needed so you can calculate compression ratio. Cosmetic seems to be the go-to gasket for most but I have also heard they can take quite awhile to get. There’s others here who have experience, I have only dreamed so far.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    357.5 KB · Views: 21

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Do you have a good LS Series engine build book? I bought this one on recommendation of a member here. It’s got a section on head gaskets. I know you need to determine thickness needed so you can calculate compression ratio. Cosmetic seems to be the go-to gasket for most but I have also heard they can take quite awhile to get. There’s others here who have experience, I have only dreamed so far.

Custom thickness gaskets for compression and quench height :thumbsup:

Yes, Cometics will likely be a wait, but maybe just for a particular size?. When I had my LH head off recently, I found that a replacement gasket wouldn't be available until sometime in January, if that soon. I needed to be back on the road ASAP so I thoroughly deep cleaned my used one and coated it with copper spray. Went 135+ mph then 900 miles on it so far.
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
Do you have a good LS Series engine build book? I bought this one on recommendation of a member here. It’s got a section on head gaskets. I know you need to determine thickness needed so you can calculate compression ratio. Cosmetic seems to be the go-to gasket for most but I have also heard they can take quite awhile to get. There’s others here who have experience, I have only dreamed so far.
Thank you. I actually have that book and one other. Will be diving deep in those books again.
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
Reached out to Cometics and had a nice discussion with them about head gaskets. They are recommending their C5751 series - which is 4.060". We discussed different thicknesses depending on the heads I want to use. If I go with the 243 heads the standard thickness would be more than sufficient. I asked about the 862 heads, and he recommended the same size bore with a thickness of .092" which would bring my compression ratio down one point. Essentially the equation is an increase of gasket thickness of .010" for every .25 pt of compression. So, I'm back to thinking I want to use my 862 heads. I'm burning 93 octane right now with my current engine and tune. Thoughts?
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Reached out to Cometics and had a nice discussion with them about head gaskets. They are recommending their C5751 series - which is 4.060". We discussed different thicknesses depending on the heads I want to use. If I go with the 243 heads the standard thickness would be more than sufficient. I asked about the 862 heads, and he recommended the same size bore with a thickness of .092" which would bring my compression ratio down one point. Essentially the equation is an increase of gasket thickness of .010" for every .25 pt of compression. So, I'm back to thinking I want to use my 862 heads. I'm burning 93 octane right now with my current engine and tune. Thoughts?

On a NA street build, I'm all for as high of compression as you can afford (tuning- and octane-wise). I like 9.5 at the bare minimum but really prefer 10.0 or more. You can easily safely tune around the preferred octane grade you wanna run with ~10:1 CR. DCR (dynamic compression ratio) is a thing, but not so critical with a stock or mild cam so I wouldn't muddy up the waters with that factor. Besides the CR, mind the quench height. This is where gasket thickness comes into play. I aimed for .037" for mine. Might be pushing it for an older engine spinning 6K, but it's been fine so far and I haven't babied it. Factor this in if you're still debating what head to use.

You'd need to know how much, if any the piston comes "outta the hole" with your new rotating assembly. 862s have a smaller chamber, that's why they recommended such thick gaskets. Although, .092" sounds excessive. But I haven't ran any calcs. You're sacrificing quench height in addition to that one point of compression. Swirl from a tight quench is one of the LS head's best characteristics. Speaking of, what are the CRs we're talking about here?
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
Good question. BBP estimated my compression ratio with dished pistons around 11:1 utilizing the 862 heads (93 octane fuel territory with the potential to knock under heavy load (like towing)). 243 heads with dished pistons at 10:5ish range. Sounds like you think a slightly thinner gasket might be the sweet spot.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Good question. BBP estimated my compression ratio with dished pistons around 11:1 utilizing the 862 heads (93 octane fuel territory with the potential to knock under heavy load (like towing)). 243 heads with dished pistons at 10:5ish range. Sounds like you think a slightly thinner gasket might be the sweet spot.

I wouldn't go thicker than stock gasket and especially not .041" thicker. I'd go slightly thinner if the piston height allows and that 10.5 is nice. But, it depends on the rotating assembly, pistons, etc. I doubt you'll have pistons coming outta the hole .055" to where .092" gaskets would yield a good quench height.
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
I wouldn't go thicker than stock gasket and especially not .041" thicker. I'd go slightly thinner if the piston height allows and that 10.5 is nice. But, it depends on the rotating assembly, pistons, etc. I doubt you'll have pistons coming outta the hole .055" to where .092" gaskets would yield a good quench height.
I've been doing some compression calculations on my own and other research, and I agree with your thoughts/suggestions. Thank you.
 
OP
OP
RAMurphy

RAMurphy

Bob
Military
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
4,649
Location
S. Maryland
I just finished up conversations with an engine builder I have utilized in the past and with Tech Support from Texas Speed. Both have stated that the engine I want to build utilizing the rotating assembly I purchased (with flathead pistons) utilizing either the 862 or 243 heads should not be a problem (using premium fuel). As I stated in an earlier thread - I already burn Premium. Texas Speed recommends the 243 heads because they breath better at higher RPMs but said 862 should not be a problem. My engine builder also stated yes 243 heads breath better but since I'm looking at lower RPMs that should not be a problem. Even Roger from Vinci Hi-Performance, who I received my upgraded camshaft from, had no issue with my build. Not sure why BBP has such a concern. The type of heads I end up using is not critical at this point - I may even use after market heads (highly unlikely (cost) but possible). Both conversations included their computation of CR and were similar to what I computed. Texas Speed recommended and computed compression ratio based on the standard head gasket thickness of .051". @iamdub - based on the rotating assembly I ordered there should not be pistons out of the hole. More research to follow.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,766
Posts
1,991,607
Members
102,756
Latest member
dizhai
Back
Top