Oil Filter Efficiency for Cleaner Oil

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

donjetman

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Posts
1,976
Reaction score
3,615
Let's say you want cleaner oil for whatever reason. You could change your oil often, or use a more efficient oil filter and change it less often.

The Fram Ultra 99.8% efficiency @ 15 microns

Oil filters that are rated at 99% efficiency (or greater) @ 20 microns:
Purolator One
Fram Ultra & Tough Guard
Donaldson Blue
Fleetguard Stratapore & Stratapore Venturi
Amsoil Ea

Oil filters that are rated at 95% @ 20 microns:
Royal Purple
Microguard Select
Fram ExtraGuard
Wix/NAPA Gold
K&N
Mobil1 EP
SuperTech
Purolator Boss

Oil filters that are rated at less than 62% at 20 microns (aka rock catchers):
Wix XP
NAPA Platinum

The test for oil filters is ISO 4548-12
Oil Filter Efficiency Compairson.jpg
 

Dustin Jackson

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Posts
1,788
Reaction score
2,064
I assume with a higher efficiency oil filter you will have lower oil pressure?

What happens when the oil filter is not able to keep up with oil pressure demand?

Will you loose oil pressure or will the bypass valve kick in and now you're using unfiltered oil?
 

Marky Dissod

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Posts
4,080
Reaction score
5,889
Location
(718)-
Let's say you want cleaner oil for whatever reason.
Like, say, you want to delay the failure of your cylinder-deactivating lifters?
You could change your oil more often, or use a more efficient oil filter and change it less often.
Or, you could use the larger-bodied version of a more efficient oil filter ...
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
5,863
what does efficiency mean when it comes to oil filters ratings?

are you getting the micron rating from the manufacturers specs or is that tested? seems like I remember reading somewhere that wix was 20 but the xp was 60, being a racing filter because at high rpm/high flow a standard filter is always in bypass anyways and not doing any good. but I've been to the wix website, and the don't seem to show that anymore?
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
5,863
Like, say, you want to delay the failure of your cylinder-deactivating lifters?Or, you could use the larger-bodied version of a more efficient oil filter ...

as someone that changes oil filters that hold up to 2 qt regularly and some of the old stuff has 2 of them inline with each other, that would be nice. but sadly you just can't get a decent sized filter on a modern car these days (seem to get smaller all the time too) without with a external setup. if you're running high rpm with a high flow pump, you filter is probably bypassing a small amount at all times. my truck makes like 30 lbs oil pressure at idle. with a 12psi bypass I bet it's passing all time, especially when it's cold.
 

OR VietVet

GMT800 2005 Tahoe Z71
Navy Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
23,681
Reaction score
44,083
Location
Willamette Valley
as someone that changes oil filters that hold up to 2 qt regularly and some of the old stuff has 2 of them inline with each other, that would be nice. but sadly you just can't get a decent sized filter on a modern car these days (seem to get smaller all the time too) without with a external setup. if you're running high rpm with a high flow pump, you filter is probably bypassing a small amount at all times. my truck makes like 30 lbs oil pressure at idle. with a 12psi bypass I bet it's passing all time, especially when it's cold.
You need to remember that the reason smaller filters were developed was because the manufacturers wanted oil pressure to be quicker on a start up. The smaller the filter the faster the oil travels thru it and the faster the pressure comes up. Wix XP or even just Wix has served me well for close to 40 years on numerous vehicles and motorcycles. Gonna stick with them, no matter what.
 

ZKWBQD

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2022
Posts
292
Reaction score
242
Let's say you want cleaner oil for whatever reason. You could change your oil often, or use a more efficient oil filter and change it less often.

The Fram Ultra 99.8% efficiency @ 15 microns

Oil filters that are rated at 99% efficiency (or greater) @ 20 microns:
Purolator One
Fram Ultra & Tough Guard
Donaldson Blue
Fleetguard Stratapore & Stratapore Venturi
Amsoil Ea

Oil filters that are rated at 95% @ 20 microns:
Royal Purple
Microguard Select
Fram ExtraGuard
Wix/NAPA Gold
K&N
Mobil1 EP
SuperTech
Purolator Boss

Oil filters that are rated at less than 62% at 20 microns (aka rock catchers):
Wix XP
NAPA Platinum

The test for oil filters is ISO 4548-12
View attachment 397351
It can be difficult getting the oil filter you want. In the event of an engine failure GM will do everything possible to deny warranty coverage. That's why so many people will only have the oil changed at the dealer. The dealer is unlikely to use the filter that you like. The one thing that I do is I change my oil every 3,000 miles. But I do it at the dealer.
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
5,863
It can be difficult getting the oil filter you want. In the event of an engine failure GM will do everything possible to deny warranty coverage. That's why so many people will only have the oil changed at the dealer. The dealer is unlikely to use the filter that you like. The one thing that I do is I change my oil every 3,000 miles. But I do it at the dealer.

I work next to a guy that has one of the brand new full size chevy trucks with the 4cyl. he loves it and says it tows 90% as well as his diesel which running 87. and way better than any gas v8 he's owned. direct injection and turbo doing work. they sold him a maintenance free package when I got it, all he's gotta do is go in and everything is done free for I think 2 years? anyways, they won't do it at the mileage he wants, no 3k oil changes for him, they will only do it at the manual recommend times.

now he doesn't have afm or anything and it probably won't matter. but still, no only is the dealer not going to use your parts, they might not even be willing to change when you want them too. the original owner won't care, cause people like that don't keep their trucks for 200k but the next 2 owners might.
 

Geotrash

Dave
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
7,843
Reaction score
20,396
Location
Richmond, VA
I work next to a guy that has one of the brand new full size chevy trucks with the 4cyl. he loves it and says it tows 90% as well as his diesel which running 87. and way better than any gas v8 he's owned. direct injection and turbo doing work. they sold him a maintenance free package when I got it, all he's gotta do is go in and everything is done free for I think 2 years? anyways, they won't do it at the mileage he wants, no 3k oil changes for him, they will only do it at the manual recommend times.

now he doesn't have afm or anything and it probably won't matter. but still, no only is the dealer not going to use your parts, they might not even be willing to change when you want them too. the original owner won't care, cause people like that don't keep their trucks for 200k but the next 2 owners might.
I rented a Sierra with the 2.7T gasser in February for a week in Lake Tahoe. I loved it! I would have no hesitation at all about owning one tow our 7500 lb. camper with.
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
5,863
I rented a Sierra with the 2.7T gasser in February for a week in Lake Tahoe. I loved it! I would have no hesitation at all about owning one tow our 7500 lb. camper with.


crazy right.

and they can't sell them because truck = v8 or nothing crowd while idling around town its whole life till it eats its lifters
 
Last edited:

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
I run the best filter of course! The K&N Gold, the one with the 1" nut on the end to aid in removal, HP-2011, the long one. 10-12 microns at 99% and flows 16 gallons per minute or 960 gallons per hour. Nobody else comes close. $15-18 a pop, ain't cheap but then the best never is.
 

MWD_CTSV

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Posts
108
Reaction score
199
Let's say you want cleaner oil for whatever reason. You could change your oil often, or use a more efficient oil filter and change it less often.

The Fram Ultra 99.8% efficiency @ 15 microns
The top Fram filter is definitely a good choice. Supposedly ?? the Ultimate (today) is basically the equivalent of the 'Ultra' used in this test.

An important thing to note is that higher efficiency doesn't necessarily mean long lasting oil filter.
Capacity Compairson Graph Pic 1.jpg


As shown in the graph here, the Fram Ultra lasts for 13.6 grams, while the Wix XP holds on for 18.1 grams. The way the test works, approximately .42 to .44 grams of particles are injected every minute. The test is stopped when the differential pressure increases a set amount.

If you do the math:
Fram Ultra ~= 13.6g / 32 min = .425 g/min
Wix XP ~= 18.1g / 43 min = .421 g/min

In other words, they are virtually collecting the same amount within the precision of measurement, but the Wix actually collects 33% more, or more specifically collects nearly all of the injected particles for 33% longer interval.
 

MWD_CTSV

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Posts
108
Reaction score
199
Oil filters that are rated at less than 62% at 20 microns (aka rock catchers):
Wix XP
NAPA Platinum

The test for oil filters is ISO 4548-12

To address the multi-pass efficiency of the test:

The way the test works, particles are injected at different sizes roughly by weight, such that the smaller particles are represented at an exponential distribution for the smaller sizes. The particles are injected at a steady rate and the test continues until the differential pressure rises indicating a loss of filter capacity.

So let's say for the sake of argument that the filter is capable of filtering 400 20 micron particles every 5 minutes. If you inject 100 particles per minute (500 per 5 minutes), after 5 minutes, you have 500 measured before the filter and 100 after. That is considered an 80% efficiency. If you continue the test for 40 minutes, you have filtered 400 x 40/5 = 3200 particles, but you have 100 that escaped every 5 minutes, so that is 800. If you add 800 to the 500 you injected in the last five minutes, the ratio of 400 that you captured to the 800 escaped plus the new 500, you are only 400/1300 = 30% efficient.

So the longer you can continue to filter without causing blockage, the more the escaped particles count against you for multi-pass efficiency. The reality however is that you have captured 3200 particles, which in my mind is 3200/4000 (captured vs injected) or 80%, but that is not how the test is actually measured, because it is purely particles counted before and after at an instant in time, not relative to what is actually captured over time. And of course being able to capture MORE particles for a longer duration of time actually counts against you.

The ideal would be to have high flow, low resistance, high capacity and high filtration in a very short interval, but it is hard to do that, so there are compromises. You can have the ability to supposedly capture 6000 miles of heavy use in a 30 minute window, or you can capture 9000 miles of heavy use in a 45 minute window. The ideal is probably more of a multistage filter where you always filter the large particles and you bypass a small percentage of flow to filter the very small particles without interrupting the flow or dropping the pressure.

With a really good filtration system, I think you could turn a 400k mile engine into a 600k mile one, but the reality is that most of the oil related failures before 200k have much more to do with a lowered oil pressure, and almost nothing to do (and I would say unproven) with a sub 98% 20 micron efficiency for the oil filter.
 

j91z28d1

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
5,863
I think I'll have to reread that again to fully understand what you're saying. but my question is how are particle bigger than the filter rating getting thru the media? is it some kinda break thru or just the bypass valve? if so it seems a higher bypass valve pressure would be helpful?

on a side note, here's a wix filter without a bypass valve with ratings I don't fully understand listed on the side of it. might be interesting.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    115.7 KB · Views: 26

Stbentoak

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Posts
2,241
Reaction score
2,693
Let's say I use a PF 66 GM filter, I would like to use a larger longer filter in its place, but I don't understand how to figure out what is a bigger filter that would fit that same filter base, is this easy to figure out?
 
OP
OP
donjetman

donjetman

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Posts
1,976
Reaction score
3,615
on a side note, here's a wix filter without a bypass valve with ratings I don't fully understand listed on the side of it. might be interesting.
I believe that is a fuel filter. Maybe it could be adapted to be a little bypass filter? I run the large Amsoil EaBP90 bypass filter.

It is my understanding in the real world there has to be something terribly wrong with an engine or its oil for athe full flow oil filter to go into bypass. Normally there is very little differential pressure across the media in a oil filter.
 
Back
Top