cardude2000
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Posts
- 2,931
- Reaction score
- 1,041
Yes. Net petroleum exports hit in 2011.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=5290
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Yes. Net petroleum exports hit in 2011.
Bush’s clean energy fund under obamas Dept of energy.Whose green energy programView attachment 277775
I don’t know if you noticed, but there is no such thing as real news anymore. They’re all propaganda or entertainment. They are filled with insults when you disagree with their line. How can several “news” stations have several different guests on and have them all say the same things, almost word for word. It’s seems like they all pick up a script.
I have no belief that I will make people “see my side”.Hey all, agree with cardude or get insulted. What a stupid way to make people see your side. Makes you look limited and invalidates whatever point you had.
Lastly, you’re right and I’ve never disagreed that EV are coming, but the current tech make them more trouble than they are worth.
Yes. Net petroleum exports hit in 2011.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=5290
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right. The point is our path to “energy independence” has been happening to decades and includes 40% renewables/nuclear today. Shale oil is a big part of it too. No doubt.Did you read the article. It said we exported more petroleum products. It also said that we exported distillate fuels such as diesel, made from Canadian oil.
It says we were still a net importer of crude oil. Plastics are petroleum products.
The loan to Solyndra was applied for and fast tracked during the Bush administration. I’m not arguing that it was finalized after he was out of office.Bush said no to any money to bail out Solyndra. Obama gave them 500plus million
Private investors do what private investors do.
The point is not to invest govt money in schemes, that politicians get the kickback from in the form of a contribution.
I don’t know if you noticed but I quoted two pretty left leaning news sources
there is a difference between petroleum product and Energy. Plastic is a petroleum product
I do wish to thank you though. It’s rare to get stimulating debates
The loan to Solyndra was applied for and fast tracked during the Bush administration. I’m not arguing that it was finalized after he was out of office.
$500 million in bad loans is nothing compared to trillions in bad wars that are nothing more than boondoggles to ensure we have cheap fuel for inefficient combustion...
The point I was making is that regardless of administration the government has always put its hand on the scale of technology and industry that it believes is the right long-term choice for the country.
And agreed. Thanks for staying civil. Some back and forth jabs are always fun and I’m glad you can hang without stomping off!
Sent from my all electric iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t listen to fear based cable/radio entertainment news so I’m out of touch with some of what you’re talking about above.I love a good debate.
Things are politicized because of who pushes the agenda. This agenda belongs solely to the AOC side if you will. And the resulting fear of her, cow tails the adults in the room from saying no, or to use caution in moving forward.
If it’s true that the republicans retake the house in 22 the agenda is dead. They have limited time
I have a feeling Jeep, Chrysler and Dodge will still offer cool vehicles. I am looking hard at that Durango with the Hellcat engine. It beat a stock C8 Corvette in the 1/4 mileWe are upgrading both of our vehicles this year. I want one more shot at great fuel based engines. Most mfgr's won't be putting any more investment in fossil fuel engines, so this year and next is about as good as it is going to get for mainstream vehicles.
When we look at new ones again in 5-7 years, the landscape will be vastly changed. whether we like it or not, EV vehicles are in our future....
https://carbuzz.com/news/dodge-says-the-future-of-the-muscle-car-is-electricI have a feeling Jeep, Chrysler and Dodge will still offer cool vehicles. I am looking hard at that Durango with the Hellcat engine. It beat a stock C8 Corvette in the 1/4 mileLOL. The customers will decide what sells and what doesn't. I thought GM would have learned this after the Roger Smith years when they pushed the J platform on just about everything including a Cadillac
![]()
I am all for EV sports cars but come on EV trucks and large SUVs? No offense but how in the hell are you going to get any range towing a load? Why do I have a feeling I'll be towing my 5th wheel with the generator running and charging my truck battery at the same time in the futurehttps://carbuzz.com/news/dodge-says-the-future-of-the-muscle-car-is-electric
“An area that Dodge has excelled at for decades with models such as the Challenger SRT Hellcat. However, Tim Kuniskis, head of Dodge, believes that the future of muscle cars lies with EVs, and he makes a pretty good case.”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
*If the changeover was today all at once and zero upgrades were made to the grid and capacity.It has been proven that if 90% of Calif switched to EV, they would be woefully short in generating capacity to power all the vehicles in garages, let alone its industry base....