'08 Z71 Tahoe Rear Control Arm Bolt Torque Specs?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

EddieC

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Posts
967
Reaction score
802
Can anyone provide the bolt torque specs?
Should the suspension be loaded before torquing?
 
OP
OP
EddieC

EddieC

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Posts
967
Reaction score
802
Thanks, I got a link to the information elsewhere.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,332
Reaction score
30,346
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Since @EddieC decided to keep the specs a secret, I'll post them here for those who come along after us! LOL

Both the Upper and Lower control arm bolts at both ends get torqued to 74 foot pounds plus 55 degrees. Do this is with the suspension supporting the weight of the vehicle.
 
OP
OP
EddieC

EddieC

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Posts
967
Reaction score
802
Since @EddieC decided to keep the specs a secret, I'll post them here for those who come along after us! LOL

Both the Upper and Lower control arm bolts at both ends get torqued to 74 foot pounds plus 55 degrees. Do this is with the suspension supporting the weight of the vehicle.
That's not what I found but don't want to vouch for the information so I didn't post it. I will say that was significantly more torque with no "plus".
 
Last edited:

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,016
Location
Li'l Weezyana
18 ugga duggas plus some° of ugga duggas.




si4lqbef2hw81.jpg
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,332
Reaction score
30,346
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
That's not what I found but don't want to vouch for the information so I didn't post it. I will say that was significantly more torque with no "plus".
Off the top of my head the uppers up front are 140 foot pounds. I seem to remember us just torquing the rears to 74 or so and calling it a day. We'll be replacing them again soon with new ones and hope to remember to report back and see if that setting held up over the years since we did it.
 

Doubeleive

Wes
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
30,801
Reaction score
48,537
Location
Stockton, Ca.
For the gmt900 1500
Rear lower control arms
74ft lbs+55deg
Rear upper control arms
118ft lb
 

mikez71

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Posts
3,398
Reaction score
4,214
Here's what charm.li says...
Apparently, lower arm @ axle (74lbft+95deg), gets more torque than lower arm @ frame (62lbft+55deg).
And upper arm torque is also a little bit more than the lower arm to frame torque..

(rear suspension torque values shown below)

suspensiontorque.png
 
Last edited:

mikez71

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Posts
3,398
Reaction score
4,214
I have not heard them called TTY anywhere yet..
 

Doubeleive

Wes
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
30,801
Reaction score
48,537
Location
Stockton, Ca.
this is from the 2012 chilton service manual hardback. the smaller vehicles (acadia/enclave) had different torq for frame-vs-axle mounting
not uncommon for gm to change the specs a little over the years of production
control.jpg
control1.jpg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
138,152
Posts
2,000,607
Members
103,079
Latest member
mfinta
Back
Top