thefrey
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2025
- Posts
- 415
- Reaction score
- 466
I also swapped the motor mount while I had the pan out (and I’m glad I did) because of all the room. And the motor mount in there quit a long time ago
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Amazing. I can't thank you enough for all of the help and info you've given me. I really appreciate it. I know what I need to do now and now I just need to do it lolI wouldn't worry about the Melling solenoid..... It's the actuator that screws into the end of the camshaft and controls valve timing, definitely stick with OEM for that. The solenoid is easy to get to if you have an issue, you're not pulling the cover again to deal with it.
No problem, that's what the forum is for. But not only saves you time working out the little details like that one bolt with a 10 mm box end wrench.... It will answer questions for a lot of people in the future that scroll through the subject matter for years.Amazing. I can't thank you enough for all of the help and info you've given me. I really appreciate it. I know what I need to do now and now I just need to do it lol
The L94 came with a HV pump from the factory. I used the Melling 365HV on my 2012 and my oil pressure has been great.So you'd say the Melling solenoid would be good to use?
I also am realistically not going to delete the AFM, so I think a HV pump will be a good thing to add to prolong the engine.
Oh interesting. Then would a Melling HV still be superior? I'm assuming it will still give me more oil pressure considering the original pump is probably somewhat wornThe L94 came with a HV pump from the factory. I used the Melling 365HV on my 2012 and my oil pressure has been great.
It's the one that Summit recommended to me at the time. I don't know if it's superior, but I know that it works very well in the L94. After my initial cam swap, I had to go back in and replace the pump because the factory pump wasn't keeping the pressure high enough - similar to your situation - even though I had replaced the o-ring with the same red one as you initially.Oh interesting. Then would a Melling HV still be superior? I'm assuming it will still give me more oil pressure considering the original pump is probably somewhat worn
Gotcha. I'll look into it. Did you need to drop your pan when you installed it or were you able to do it just through the front cover?It's the one that Summit recommended to me at the time. I don't know if it's superior, but I know that it works very well in the L94. After my initial cam swap, I had to go back in and replace the pump because the factory pump wasn't keeping the pressure high enough - similar to your situation - even though I had replaced the o-ring with the same red one as you initially.
Had to drop the pan, unfortunately.Gotcha. I'll look into it. Did you need to drop your pan when you installed it or were you able to do it just through the front cover?
Well, that's lovely considering I just dropped the pan yesterday and put it back together. Might be doing it again thenHad to drop the pan, unfortunately.
Oh, one of the reasons I went with the 3-bolt non-VVT cam was to get rid of that damned tensioner and replace it with the bowtie type for better durability.
I know it and I'm feeling your pain. Had to drop my pan 3x myself because of bad lifter trays taking out cams until I figured it out.Well, that's lovely considering I just dropped the pan yesterday and put it back together. Might be doing it again then
Were you at least able to reuse your oil pan gasket or did you purchase a new one every time?I know it and I'm feeling your pain. Had to drop my pan 3x myself because of bad lifter trays taking out cams until I figured it out.
I was able to reuse it, thankfully. Just gotta gently clean up those corners real good.Were you at least able to reuse your oil pan gasket or did you purchase a new one every time?
Check your numbers on this because it hasn't matched my research or experience at all. And I went down many rabbit holes both here and on the LS1Tech forums. As best I can tell, VVT is good for MAYBE 15 hp down low - it's mainly a fuel economy play on the L94 - and that 15 hp is easily made up for with the right cam. I have two Yukon XL Denali's - one with the L92 and factory cam with VVT, and one with the cammed L94. Both are Blackbear tuned and the L94 without VVT will run circles around the L92 with VVT.For everyday street use, the VVT is fantastic. It's what gives you low end torque, which gives you the good fuel mileage, yet you still have 408 horsepower if you wind it out. You can go for much more horsepower with a non VVT cam, and frequently end up with less low end torque and you sacrifice fuel mileage. It all depends on what year goal for the vehicle is. In my case it's my wife's commuter car on her 50 mile a day round trip on a state highway with a 55 mph speed limit. Lol, she doesn't need 500 horsepower. If you do the AFM delete, you don't need the 365 HP pump. I usually install the Melling 10296 with the +10 PSI spring installed, and simply swap out the OEM VVT AFM camshaft for an L92 VVT camshaft.... You'll keep the stock power rating, and lose the AFM but retain variable valve timing. It all depends on what you want to do..... And how fast your wife wants to go![]()