Get a catch can before any mods.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Clean07Burb

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Posts
784
Reaction score
18
Is this mod worthwhile on an 07 Yukon XL Denali with a 6.2L ???

Most definitely.

I also had Justin turn my AFM off when he did my in person tune and I don't get nearly as much out of my catch can during oil changes as I did before. Good indication that the AFM has a lot to do with oil consumption.
 
Last edited:

14SWTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Posts
150
Reaction score
1
Location
Tampa FL
Oh... Well that makes better sense...
No I do not have the DOD delete
@14SWtahoe

Jiggy-J

Cool, just wondering cause I am trying to gauge my next oil change and how much oil would be in my can. This one coming up will be my first change with the AFM deleted.... hoping for good results!
 

BigBlueLB756

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Posts
200
Reaction score
126
Location
By Marion, MS
I Just used the stock fittings. Shouldn't be that hard that you would break fittings

---------- Post added at 10:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 AM ----------

You didnt twist the fitting did you? It should twist off if i recall correctly.

---------- Post added at 10:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 AM ----------

45a71fd886371bcf6aca3922dcca16cb.jpg

Or you could just snip the plastic pipe in two, swivel the ends around and slide your 3/8" hose on and clamp them. If you decide to remove the catch can system, a simple 2" piece of hose will make a splice joint to put the stock pipe back together.
 

BigBlueLB756

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Posts
200
Reaction score
126
Location
By Marion, MS
I'm running two in series right now (just because I can) and either of these locations are good. Some folks run them on various places on the engine, but outboard is better for oil collection in a cooler place. But that's just me.

100_0479.jpg


Anywhere is better than not having one at all. JMO
 

TwiztidXL

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Posts
46
Reaction score
12
Location
MN
Just ordered up my Catch Can today. I didn't see anything on ship times. I'm guessing it is shipping ground. How long did you guys wait to get it in? I'm hoping to have mine installed before I go on Vacation next Thursday.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Posts
80
Reaction score
4
These aren't necessary for those of us without AFM/DOD, is that a fair assumption from what I'm reading? I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary when I installed my MIT, and it seems that if I were consuming oil like I've seen from those that do have AFM/DOD I would have other problems to address.
 

RotaryMachineRx

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Posts
106
Reaction score
1
Location
Saskatoon, SK
It's not necessarily a "problem", the oil vapour circulation is by design, albeit a poor design your engine will run perfectly fine for years without a catch can. It is for those of us who prefer to keep the throttle body/intake manifold cleaner. There is risk for this stuff to gunk up over time but this is after many many miles. It is typical in many engines.
 
Last edited:

ezdaar

Chat Troll
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Posts
3,715
Reaction score
127
Location
Redneck central, Aka Houston
Me? no. All my engines are tight and have a proper PCV system.

Millions of others? Hell yes. Its all over the forums.
Some have seen as much as a quart loss every 500 miles.
 

RotaryMachineRx

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Posts
106
Reaction score
1
Location
Saskatoon, SK
So let's say you're changing your oil every 4000 miles... You're saying that people are losing/adding 8 quarts of oil to their engine because of the PCV circulating into the intake in between every oil change.... Get real
 

CHOO CHOO

BackPagePhil
Joined
Feb 21, 2011
Posts
12,787
Reaction score
5,032
Location
Manheim, Pa
Even 2-3 oz every 3k is ridiculous. Either way, spending 70-100 bucks is worth every penny imo to keep that shit from clogging up.
 

al2fast

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2015
Posts
127
Reaction score
34
Location
Wisky
These aren't necessary for those of us without AFM/DOD, is that a fair assumption from what I'm reading? I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary when I installed my MIT, and it seems that if I were consuming oil like I've seen from those that do have AFM/DOD I would have other problems to address.

No afm here and when I installed the Cai and catch can at 80k on my 09 YD there was a puddle of oil in the intake that you could see when you opened up the tb butterfly. Catches other 'milky' crap in it too. I plan on keeping this truck to 200k so it's cheap insurance for me.
 

aflumb

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Posts
328
Reaction score
331
Location
Las Vegas
So since i just read the last couple post. Would it be normal for me to not find any oil in my catch can or intake since having DOD/AFM disabled by BBP. But there was some when i first installed my MIT after around the 3k-5k range. But since the tune i have seen any in the intake. 2012 Truck only has 32K
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,710
Posts
1,990,174
Members
102,701
Latest member
vsaravia
Back
Top