What did you do to your NNBS GMT900 Tahoe/Yukon Today?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

HiHoeSilver

Away!
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
10,918
Reaction score
14,578
Location
Chicago
I'm no brake engineer but I question the notion of slots in rotors acting as a cutting area on pads.

These slots appear to be valleys without edges that are raised, or proud, of the flat rotor surface, and they are angled relative the the pads' passing over them. Can they truly serve to cut the pad? Very curious.

It's been my understanding that slotted rotors perform a bit better, but not dramatically better, than solid surface rotors because they facilitate better heat dispersion and minimize glazing, not because they facilitate better bite by virtue of cutting action.

Discuss.

Wholeheartedly agree with your last paragraph. The "cutting" action is certainly not the primary intended function of the slots. I do believe, however, that it happens. Thus the extra dust. Like @iamdub said, you're squishing the pad in there with constant applied pressure. This means that the edge doesn't need to be proud to act as a 'blade'. The pad material is also key to this equation. Think of what it would look like if you pressed a sponge against one of those spinning slots.
 

08HoeCD

Full Access Member
Joined
May 6, 2016
Posts
2,052
Reaction score
1,934
True, the better quality slotted rotors have slots with more of a radiused edge and angled wall than just a sharp corner. But, it's still a flat rotor surface that meets a void. The pad material, on a microscopic level, is still deflecting (being "squished") into this void. The harder the braking- the more that is squished into the void and the more material that is shaved. Yes, this provides more friction. But the primary function of the slot is to evacuate the gasses and heat formed under braking while channeling in ambient air- all which help to cool the rotor and pad which prevents glazing, fading and warping.

I'm a believer in their function. Years back, when cryo-tempered rotors were new to the general market, Powerslot teamed up with a cryogenics company to produce their "Frozen Rotors" line. I had one of the first, if not THE first set on my S10. I was a total ******* to those rotors for 11 years/70,000 miles until I sold the truck. Went through 3 sets of Hawk HP pads (never turned the rotors). I could stand on the brake pedal from 120MPH+ and never get so much as a pull or shimmy in the steering wheel and the brakes bit just as hard as always. The last 20,000 miles I had the truck, the pads were being squished even harder by a hydrabooster. The only thing I ever noticed after all this braking asshattery was a notably heavier coating of dust on the wheels.

I'll use my soapbox time here to give my review on PowerStop rotors. I thought the cryo-tempered rotors from PowerStop were the same as the Frozen PowerSlot. I don't believe they are, or maybe the quality of the base rotor is less. I think PowerStop, PowerSlot, Stop Tech, etc. are all one and the same, using Centric rotors. Assuming I was replicating what I had on my S10, I installed some cryo-tempered PowerStops and Hawk LTS pads (LTS since it's a full-size vehicle). I performed a break-in process by combining PowerStop and Hawk's recommended procedures as they were a little different but not really conflicting. The brakes felt great with more bite than stock and the warping was gone. A few days later, I drove to Tampa, Florida. While slowing down to a red light, the damned warping was back. I hadn't done ANY hard braking. It was less than 1,000 miles, 800+ of which was interstate driving with no brake use, and no hard braking before they started their bucking shit again. I keep seeing positive reviews on R1 rotors so I think I'm gonna give them a shot. These bite great and all, but I can't stand the feelings of warped rotors.

Wholeheartedly agree with your last paragraph. The "cutting" action is certainly not the primary intended function of the slots. I do believe, however, that it happens. Thus the extra dust. Like @iamdub said, you're squishing the pad in there with constant applied pressure. This means that the edge doesn't need to be proud to act as a 'blade'. The pad material is also key to this equation. Think of what it would look like if you pressed a sponge against one of those spinning slots.

I'm not buying 100% of what you gents are selling me, but since I'm no mechanical engineer I'm just gonna say, "okay."

;)
 

HiHoeSilver

Away!
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
10,918
Reaction score
14,578
Location
Chicago
I'm not buying 100% of what you gents are selling me, but since I'm no mechanical engineer I'm just gonna say, "okay."

;)

Here's the plan. You put one solid and one slotted rotor on your truck. Same pads on both. Check the dust in 2 weeks. Compare. Document. Let us know what happens.

:happy107:
 

08HoeCD

Full Access Member
Joined
May 6, 2016
Posts
2,052
Reaction score
1,934
Here's the plan. You put one solid and one slotted rotor on your truck. Same pads on both. Check the dust in 2 weeks. Compare. Document. Let us know what happens.

:happy107:

Great idea to test the theory!

But this kid ain't doing it. Lol
 

08grey

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Posts
4,596
Reaction score
725
I got my cryogenic rotors from amazon for like 120 a rotor. This was to replace the r1 with the hawk pads. The cryogenic are better I run them with the akebono pads and are happy.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Cbark2305

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Posts
209
Reaction score
69
Got it on Wednesday got a chance today to get it washed and waxed

IMG_0248.JPG IMG_0249.JPG
 

kbuskill

***CAUTION*** I do my own stunts!
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Posts
5,825
Reaction score
9,836
Location
NE. FL.
I removed my headlights and wet sanded and clearcoated them with 2K clear and installed white/amber LED switchbacks in the parking lights/turn signals with resistors and also replaced the high beam bulbs with 100 watt bulbs and replaced the low beam HIDs I had with some better Morimoto bulbs. I am pretty happy with the out come for now..... until my next trick (project).... lol
 

PG01

Elite Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Posts
15,686
Reaction score
21,100
Location
Up here to the right
I removed my headlights and wet sanded and clearcoated them with 2K clear and installed white/amber LED switchbacks in the parking lights/turn signals with resistors and also replaced the high beam bulbs with 100 watt bulbs and replaced the low beam HIDs I had with some better Morimoto bulbs. I am pretty happy with the out come for now..... until my next trick (project).... lol
:pics-stfu:
 

calif phil

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Posts
208
Reaction score
213
Location
Concordia KS
I filled mine up with E85 last night. Drove 50 miles and could not tell a difference in power or mileage. I never tried it before and thought I would try one tank. It was 50 cents a gallon cheaper. The town I live in does not have an E85 pump so I doubt I will buy it again.
 

mtc1328

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2017
Posts
68
Reaction score
108
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Only after one month of ownership, I decided to install a 1.5" leveling kit to get rid of the forward lean. I still have a slight rake in the rear, but I prefer that look over the previous. I took way longer than the average install time, as I ended up breaking a lower shock bolt and had to drill and cut it to get it out, but I got it done. It was a good bonding opportunity for me and the truck. haha.
I appreciate those of you who share your knowledge on this site. It has been a big help so far.
I couldn't find a perfectly level parking lot for the pictures, but I tried to be consistent.
Leveled Tahoe Before.After2.jpg
 

Drok

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Posts
1,308
Reaction score
1,193
Location
Cold place in the north
I filled mine up with E85 last night. Drove 50 miles and could not tell a difference in power or mileage. I never tried it before and thought I would try one tank. It was 50 cents a gallon cheaper. The town I live in does not have an E85 pump so I doubt I will buy it again.

Never seen an e85 pump here haha
 

05Single

afraid of the dark
Joined
Feb 26, 2015
Posts
8,244
Reaction score
11,646

93blkongreenpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Posts
1,388
Reaction score
1,358
I'm hating the way this Flowmaster Thunder kit is looking. I'm thinking about cutting it where it isn't visible. Ideas?
I'm thinking cut where it connects? Is that about where the factory resonator sits?
25eded4e12fed94e8a2ee896b4975a27.jpg
5912df2eb4f51fdf0e1d2a0801df8783.jpg
7be56196a028ac715f4d7df3983fa29a.jpg


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

93blkongreenpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Posts
1,388
Reaction score
1,358
I filled mine up with E85 last night. Drove 50 miles and could not tell a difference in power or mileage. I never tried it before and thought I would try one tank. It was 50 cents a gallon cheaper. The town I live in does not have an E85 pump so I doubt I will buy it again.
I did 2 fillups with e85 to make sure that I was running 100% e85 and I never saw more than 11.9 mpg combined. I normally get 16ish combined driving.

I'd rather do the 93 tune with my bully dog than run the e85. It's roughly the same power, imho, and it holds 4th gear longer on the highway without downshifting, which is where the mpg incease comes from for me with the 93.

The e85 burns too quick. It it was 1 or 2 dollars cheaper, yeah. At .30 or .50 cheaper, the gas station is getting rich selling you 15% gas.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,786
Posts
1,992,248
Members
102,780
Latest member
ASG-MikeS

Latest posts

Back
Top