Common Issues

[Meccanoble]

I see a few recalls regarding 4WD and brake booster? Previous gen had common issue with motor mounts and AFM. What are common issues I need to look for if i wanted to jump into a newer Tahoe/Yukon?

 

[HiHoeSilver]

I see a few recalls regarding 4WD and brake booster? Previous gen had common issue with motor mounts and AFM. What are common issues I need to look for if i wanted to jump into a newer Tahoe/Yukon?

#1 issue is that you'll wish you had your old one back.

 

[calif phil]

I sure don't. My 15 outshines my '12 in everyway.

 

[cardude2000]

I sure don't. My 15 outshines my '12 in everyway.

+1 to that. Couldn’t pay me to swap my 16 for my old 10.

 

[Rdr854]

+1 to that. Couldn’t pay me to swap my 16 for my old 10.

But back in their day, the 07-14 gen Suburbans were the truck to have. The 15-20 gen is a vast improvement in quality, safety, features and bang for the buck.

I drove our 08 from VA to Houston and back every year and it was a comfortable drive and plenty of room for 3 kids and their stuff.

 

[Meccanoble]

#1 issue is that you'll wish you had your old one back.

I love my 2011 besides the dash and age. The new ones look better especially on the inside but Chevy/GMC family looks better than the Fords and other competition. Was tempted to look at the Expeditions but those Ecoboosts scare me especially since whatever I get next will be out of warranty

 

[Bigkevschopshop]

The only thing I can say on the new ones... The shoulder room is decreased, if you have a build like a refrigerator you will have your shoulder hitting the b pillar if you don't move the seat forward by a decent amount.

Issues I have heard but cannot confirm... AC controls give up the ghost... If looking at a 6.2 do not buy an 8 speed wait for a 10.... There is the buffering and booming reports... 22" wheels ride like crap is another..

Can confirm.....Esky only HVAC and radio chrome knobs things loose sensitivity and don't work after a while, they go bad very quickly.

BUT I will say this, dash isn't prone to cracking... leather wrapped stuff is alot nicer also.. Dash controls are nice update... Interior fit and finish is nice also...increased output on the 5.3 is nice... I will be interested to see how the direct injection holds up though when some folks get mid to high 100k range...

Justification though for 30k + pricetag for used is just hard to swallow... Reason I didn't swap yet... I have driven a 19 esky, 17 yukon denalli, few 15s and 16s also, best bet is with yukon... Mag ride control after being flashed for the latest software can make a bumpy 15,16 ride much better. All models have their issues, go over whatever you are getting with a fine tooth comb... Don't take anything for granted, dealers will put it in dry with no lube...

 

[OR VietVet]

#1 issue is that you'll wish you had your old one back.

I was recently looking for a newer Tahoe than my 2002 NBS. I kept running in to problems and one of them was lack of shoulder room. I was looking at the 2007-2014 NNBS. I then decided one day to keep my 2002 and a few members here said that they here this phrase a lot. "I wish I had my NBS ** back".

 

[Meccanoble]

i dont know people that wish they kept their NBS when upgrading to NNBS but many are giving that feedback when going to the 2015+ from an NNBS. About to do more research on the reliability of the Expedition ecoboost lol.

 

[wjburken]

i dont know people that wish they kept their NBS when upgrading to NNBS but many are giving that feedback when going to the 2015+ from an NNBS. About to do more research on the reliability of the Expedition ecoboost lol.

The early Ecoboosts had some issues with turbo failures. I think they got a lot of that figured out in 2013/2014 years. I have a 2016 F-150 SCREW with the 3.5 Twin Turbo Ecoboost and have been very impressed with it.

That being said, I also like my 2013 Yukon XL Denali.

 

[Meccanoble]

The early Ecoboosts had some issues with turbo failures. I think they got a lot of that figured out in 2013/2014 years. I have a 2016 F-150 SCREW with the 3.5 Twin Turbo Ecoboost and have been very impressed with it.

That being said, I also like my 2013 Yukon XL Denali.

Yea I was looking at 2016 expedition eco boost but it would be high mileage. I bought my 2011 Tahoe with 119k miles and though it had some issues, it made me happy. I'm scared to take that chance with Ford but I hear they have gotten better and glad to hear the recent years are making great progress in reliability. I was always a turbo fan and I would be the one to put a BOV on mine lol. More power than the Tahoe with better gas mileage and takes regular gas. Love the Tahoe interior better but 2016 Expedition is the end of that era where 2015/16 Tahoe is the beginning and you know what they say about the early years of an era....

 

[fozzi58]

I'm about to cross the dreaded 36k/end of bumper to bumper on my 17 Burb and there is no booming. I have to assume they fixed the roof issue with the '17s. I LOVED my 08 Avalanche. Still the best car I have ever owned but as others have said the fit and finish, not to mention the looks of the next gens is much better.

Get a '17 or higher.
If going for 6.2 get 10 speed trans
I can't speak to harsh rides on the 22's cause I am on 24's with a drop and stiffer suspension so the "harshness" is something I expected when trying to build a 6000lbs corner carver.

A friend of mine has a 19 Lincoln Navigator, top of the line everything. Its even got some "boat package" thing where the stitching on the seats looks like ropes. Its absolutely gorgeous and level of luxury in the truck kills his old Caddy. However, the TwinTurbo 3.5 is a dog compared to my 5.3, let alone the 6.2 that was in his 15 Esky.

 

[Meccanoble]

I'm about to cross the dreaded 36k/end of bumper to bumper on my 17 Burb and there is no booming. I have to assume they fixed the roof issue with the '17s. I LOVED my 08 Avalanche. Still the best car I have ever owned but as others have said the fit and finish, not to mention the looks of the next gens is much better.

Get a '17 or higher.
If going for 6.2 get 10 speed trans
I can't speak to harsh rides on the 22's cause I am on 24's with a drop and stiffer suspension so the "harshness" is something I expected when trying to build a 6000lbs corner carver.

A friend of mine has a 19 Lincoln Navigator, top of the line everything. Its even got some "boat package" thing where the stitching on the seats looks like ropes. Its absolutely gorgeous and level of luxury in the truck kills his old Caddy. However, the TwinTurbo 3.5 is a dog compared to my 5.3, let alone the 6.2 that was in his 15 Esky.

The Navigator is super heavy, maybe thats why?

2017 is first year with the 10 speed? Scared of that too unless its on other trucks already?

 

[SuperOldSchool]

Maybe a lot of my issues are due to 2015 being the new model year/ changes. I’ve had a lot of issues that should not come with a $70k price tag:

HVAC condensor
Fuel pump
Failed #5 lifter
Failed fuel injector
New transmission
New radiator
New struts (3 of 4 frozen)
New collision sensors
New exhaust system
New GPS antenna
New serpentine tensioner
New seat warmer element
Replaced water filled headlight and tail light

Prob more, but that’s what I recal top of my head.

Most of these were before 60k miles. Trans was at 14k...

Thank goodness for extended warranty. This will be my last GM vehicle.

 

[OR VietVet]

Maybe a lot of my issues are due to 2015 being the new model year/ changes. I’ve had a lot of issues that should not come with a $70k price tag:

HVAC condensor
Fuel pump
Failed #5 lifter
Failed fuel injector
New transmission
New radiator
New struts (3 of 4 frozen)
New collision sensors
New exhaust system
New GPS antenna
New serpentine tensioner
New seat warmer element
Replaced water filled headlight and tail light

Prob more, but that’s what I recal top of my head.

Most of these were before 60k miles. Trans was at 14k...

Thank goodness for extended warranty. This will be my last GM vehicle.

I like to shoot guns at my favorite outdoor "Second Amendment Theme Park" and I own nothing but Ruger firearms. I have come across a problem or two over the years but the Ruger customer service has always been top notch and very fast. I would not look elsewhere for a firearm because of a problem with a Ruger gun. If the CS was crap though I might. Was the Chevy warranty/customer service bad? Have you had trouble with other GM vehicles?

 

[SuperOldSchool]

That’s a really bad comparison. Daily transportation and recreational firearms are apples and oranges.

• Have you spent over $70k on Ruger guns?
• Did you purchase 1 gun for over $70k?
• Did the failures interrupt your daily ability to commute to work and appointments?

The service has been fine, but the product should have had much more extensive QA/ testing before release. For the cost of the truck a customer should not have to bring it in for service almost monthly. I’m sorry, I don’t understand your analogy.

 

[OR VietVet]

I am only comparing a product and not how they are used. In your analogy you mentioned one vehicle. Did you own other GM vehicles with problems that stack up like this one? That was one of my previous questions and was not answered. IMO, you have only told about and focused on one vehicle. Was it new or a used vehicle? Did you get previous records for repairs and maintenance? Was it a rental vehicle? I am not trying to talk you out of your desire to never buy another GM vehicle, I am just trying to get as much info as I can. Your reaction is an emotional one because of price, daily driver and the list of problems. By the way, I have 2 Unicorn Ruger guns that are worth $5k each. That is just 2 out of 13 firearms. I use them for fun at the range and self protection. I would assume you used your rig for fun as well. Just questions is all I was asking.

 

[SuperOldSchool]

I have owned a 1997 Saturn, 1999 Grand Prix and my wife’s 2011 SRX. They did not experience the numerous issues as the Yukon, but had some issues.

My cars are always purchased new and maintained with the severe service schedule. I use only fully synthetic fluids in all cars, these Yukon issues are not due to lack of maintenance. Also, I don’t tow, so those stresses on the drivetrain are not present (for example the tranny failure at 14k miles).

The above GM cars were on proven platforms. For example, the Grand Prix 3800 series motor had been in production for many years and was proven. The SRX was on the Theta platform for several years.

My point is GM should have not released their flagship truck platform with so many recurring issues. My dealer is great, but I shouldn’t have to go visit them every couple months with major component failures.

 

[OR VietVet]

Ok. All good. I was recently looking for a "newer" Tahoe. Ran in to run around by sales people and not as much comfort room compared to my NBS 2002. I did not know that you bought all vehicles new. When extended warranty is mentioned I assume used in some cases. I am one of those people that never ever buy an extended warranty. Some people love them and they come in handy at times with a major repair.

I prefer to keep a maintenance/repair fund stocked up with money for times I need it and I feel the odds are always in my favor.

 

[Tonka44]

I'm about to cross the dreaded 36k/end of bumper to bumper on my 17 Burb and there is no booming. I have to assume they fixed the roof issue with the '17s. I LOVED my 08 Avalanche. Still the best car I have ever owned but as others have said the fit and finish, not to mention the looks of the next gens is much better.

Get a '17 or higher.
If going for 6.2 get 10 speed trans
I can't speak to harsh rides on the 22's cause I am on 24's with a drop and stiffer suspension so the "harshness" is something I expected when trying to build a 6000lbs corner carver.

A friend of mine has a 19 Lincoln Navigator, top of the line everything. Its even got some "boat package" thing where the stitching on the seats looks like ropes. Its absolutely gorgeous and level of luxury in the truck kills his old Caddy. However, the TwinTurbo 3.5 is a dog compared to my 5.3, let alone the 6.2 that was in his 15 Esky.

There is something seriously wrong with that Navigator if you think it is a dog compared to your 5.3. Those Navigators are at like 450 horsepower and are torque monsters down low, those 3.5's move. Did you drive it?