6.2 gas vs. 3.0 Duramax, which one to buy?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
isp5190

isp5190

Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Posts
53
Reaction score
44
Drove from Florida to Texas this weekend. I have a 23 Tahoe with 6.2 liter and Corsa exhaust. Tahoe has 3500 miles. I did not drive in Sport mode like I normally do but I turned off the Auto Stop. Below are the mpg results. (Used the DIC readings)

Full trip - mostly hiway at speed of 75-80 mph
Miles driven - 770 miles
Avg speed - 68.0 miles/hr
Avg mpg - 20.7 miles/gal

Last tank of gas - mostly hiway at 75-80 mph but 100 miles at 65-70 mph due to rain
Miles driven - 407 miles
Avg speed - 66.1 miles/hr
Avg mpg - 21.3 mpg

I have pictures if you want verification.

I was pleasantly surprised with the fuel efficiency of this rig.
Thanks for the info.
 

Stbentoak

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Posts
2,271
Reaction score
2,764
Interesting, I sent this to my brother that just got a new Suburban with the Duramax. Thanks
This is an old video and all it really proves is that this is a pretty tough engine to last that long with lousy to no real maintenance or care. Has zero to do with the engines durability or longevity if cared for......
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,851
Reaction score
2,299
Location
GA
Who says it wasn’t cared for? I watched the whole video and don’t remember him saying it wasn’t cared for or maintained. The inside is quite clean, it looks pretty well cared for to me. The metal is still its original color. I’ve seen gassers that look way worse than that.

I think this is the only reported 3.0L complete failure I’ve heard of so I wouldn’t really worry about it either way. The timing chains in the rear is absolutely stupid though. I wouldn’t buy any vehicle designed that way (looking at you, Audi).
 

TollKeeper

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Posts
3,596
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Brighton, CO
This is an old video and all it really proves is that this is a pretty tough engine to last that long with lousy to no real maintenance or care. Has zero to do with the engines durability or longevity if cared for......
Old video? Just released Saturday?
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,851
Reaction score
2,299
Location
GA
He’s just going refute anything anyone says that is remotely negative about trucks. All I said in my original comment in this thread was the 3.0L leaks and has more maintenance and he jumped all over me. I was going to post a video I made of all the creaky panels in multiple 21+ vehicles but figured it wasn’t worth the effort because he’ll still say I’m wrong because his doesn’t do it and I don’t need to be right as badly as he does.
 

TollKeeper

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Posts
3,596
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Brighton, CO
Do you really think it could get 168K views in just a few days? Most likely reposted from previous....
Yes... He posts his videos every Friday/Saturday, and he has quite the following with 268k followers. Its not a repost.
 

DontTaseMeBro

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Posts
415
Reaction score
334
Who says it wasn’t cared for? I watched the whole video and don’t remember him saying it wasn’t cared for or maintained. The inside is quite clean, it looks pretty well cared for to me. The metal is still its original color. I’ve seen gassers that look way worse than that.

I think this is the only reported 3.0L complete failure I’ve heard of so I wouldn’t really worry about it either way. The timing chains in the rear is absolutely stupid though. I wouldn’t buy any vehicle designed that way (looking at you, Audi).
Oil pump belt, not timing chain.
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,851
Reaction score
2,299
Location
GA
Yes timing chain. It’s all on the back of the engine. Step one for replacement (or any job that requires its removal) is to remove the engine but many are pulling the cab instead.
 

PPK_

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2024
Posts
160
Reaction score
147
Location
Oklahoma City
Yes timing chain. It’s all on the back of the engine. Step one for replacement (or any job that requires its removal) is to remove the engine but many are pulling the cab instead.
I ended up with a 5.3 Tahoe. My third 5.3 counting one other Tahoe and Sierra.. oil burners.. good but the 5.3 is better overall. 5.3 with a ten sp is plenty for me.
 

TollKeeper

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Posts
3,596
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Brighton, CO
Yes timing chain. It’s all on the back of the engine. Step one for replacement (or any job that requires its removal) is to remove the engine but many are pulling the cab instead.
?????????

Oil Pump Belt, and step one is to drop the transmission.
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,851
Reaction score
2,299
Location
GA
IMG_0588.jpeg
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,851
Reaction score
2,299
Location
GA
No. Everything is on the back of the engine.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0590.jpeg
    IMG_0590.jpeg
    200.9 KB · Views: 29

Forum statistics

Threads
138,035
Posts
1,997,542
Members
102,973
Latest member
CRN_25

Latest posts

Back
Top