ReaperHWK
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Posts
- 951
- Reaction score
- 1,161
Solid!
Keep in mind though with the 6.2 I’m using 93 octane so kinda offsets a little with the per mile fuel costs since your paying more than 87.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Solid!
Yeah exactly. Premium only tends to be 10 cents more per litre where I am…. Like 37-38 cents per gallon. Not a huge hit at these prices but not nothing.Keep in mind though with the 6.2 I’m using 93 octane so kinda offsets a little with the per mile fuel costs since your paying more than 87.
As much as the fancy displays and computers seem great, you should log fuel and perform manual calculations for comparison. You will find the vehicle calculations vary. City is usually lower and highway (<66mph) could be higher. I have been logging fuel for the last 8 years on 5 different suvs and all are a bit off.View attachment 483660
View attachment 483661
Looks like my truck averaged about 15mpg over the 5000 miles since new. On the highway it gets mid-low 20’s.
Yeah it’s pretty crazy what some of the spreads are. Complete rip off lol.Premium is a solid dollar more a gallon most anywhere in the states where we are. Costco usually does a little better It is about 60 to 70 cents higher than regular. No matter what premium is the biggest rip off out there. You have to have it, but it used to be 30 cents more a gallon... now a dollar.... Pretty much common.
One thing I’ve noticed with my ‘24 Yukon XL diesel is the computer read out is insanely accurate. Often bang on or only off by ~1-2% max.As much as the fancy displays and computers seem great, you should log fuel and perform manual calculations for comparison. You will find the vehicle calculations vary. City is usually lower and highway (<66mph) could be higher. I have been logging fuel for the last 8 years on 5 different suvs and all are a bit off.
I get that with diesel rides, but I have not made that change over yet.One thing I’ve noticed with my ‘24 Yukon XL diesel is the computer read out is insanely accurate. Often bang on or only off by ~1-2% max.
I don’t think one should put all their faith in a pump reading either. I know there are checks and balances but the financial incentive to cheat is a variable that can’t be ignored. One day I will do a manual calculation of my gas mileage for SAG since I do use the same station most times I buy gas unless I’m on a road trip.My computer is usually off no more than 0.1MPG vs manual calculations. But, that is only true if I fill up at the same station using the same pump. If you park on a slight incline vs a decline, or fill at a different pump, you can possibly add or not add a half gallon vs prior fill up. This is enough to make one think the computer is “inaccurate.”
As I posted previously on the latest GM earnings report, they beat estimates for revenue and margin with positive guidance.So not to beat a dead horse..... so does anyone know what the actual failure rate is on the 6.2L? Was looking at a FB page with many folks claiming they are on their 3rd or 4th engines and engines are on a 9-12 week backorder. You'd think the roads would be littered with failed vehicles. I've not seen a lot of chatter here in recent months which leads me to believe that those that are going to fail have already done so.
The recalls did appear in the 2025 earnings report, and they contributed to a 35% decline in net income in Q2 2025.As I posted previously on the latest GM earnings report, they beat estimates for revenue and margin with positive guidance.
No mention of warranty issues affecting margin or revenue. That doesn’t give us an exact number but the data indicates
it is not significant.
If the failure rate was even 5% of one the biggest revenue streams it would have to make the earnings report.
Financial reports are subject to scrutiny and SEC rules and if GM was fudging anything that would be sanctioned and big news.
As always if you want truth - follow the money!
This doesn’t help anyone in that 3-5% but perspective is important and any mass production that has a 95%+ success rate is pretty good.
Good catch!The recalls did appear in the 2025 earnings report, and they contributed to a 35% decline in net income in Q2 2025.
"RISKS
Warranty Costs: Paul Jacobson said, "for the full year, we now expect warranty to be a year-over-year headwind," citing higher claims for both L87 powertrain and early EV software issues in 2025."
35% decline in net income?The recalls did appear in the 2025 earnings report, and they contributed to a 35% decline in net income in Q2 2025.
"RISKS
Warranty Costs: Paul Jacobson said, "for the full year, we now expect warranty to be a year-over-year headwind," citing higher claims for both L87 powertrain and early EV software issues in 2025."
Mine was from the Q2 earning call in 2025. Remember, the recalls don't go through 2026 vehicles, yet...Just trying to get accurate information on the first quarter GM earnings.
This is the CNBC interview with Paul Jacobson about the first quarter 2026 earnings.
No mention about warranty claims