Oil Capacity Question/Verification

[DuraYuk]

An old rule of thumb was 90% of engine wear occurs during start. Auto start/stop is the dumbest thing ever.

That rule of thumb applies on a cold start when lubricants have not had time to circulate. Again this isn't based on reality.

 

[DuraYuk]

I have heard this same crap from many who commented on this thread.

Do you REALIZE that I matched the oil level found in the engine when the vehicle was delivered?

Do you REALIZE I have checked multiple other new vehicles and found the exact same situation?

Do you REALIZE this the level is about 1/8" above the top full mark on the dipstick?

Do you really think that 1/8" above the fill mark the crank will be hitting the oil in the crankcase?

Do you understand this level is well below the windage tray mounted to the bottom of the engine?

I understand what you are trying to do but realistically probably dont need to convince folks how you know better etc. If you want to overkill the engine do so but we dont need you telling everyone else how this is the correct way outside of what the manufacturer recommends.

I too was a gm heavy line tech and there is no way I'm recommending anything to customers or friends outside the scope of the manufacture. You open yourself up to all sorts of liability. And when things go side ways no one is siding with the customer because they did something stupid at the behest of some random person on a forums.

What works for you is great. Share your experience. But dont come here convincing everyone how GM is wrong, engineers are wrong, their eyes are wrong, the dipstick is wrong, the design is wrong, but only you are right.

Just my 2 cents.

 

[the 18th letter]

Shutting the vehicle off every time you come to a complete stop is a grand idea, why waste gas in stop and go traffic. Warming a car up and damage being done to engines on start up are no longer applicable to the ways vehicles are produced. Drivers will soon become obsolete as well.

 

[jfoj]

I understand what you are trying to do but realistically probably dont need to convince folks how you know better etc. If you want to overkill the engine do so but we dont need you telling everyone else how this is the correct way outside of what the manufacturer recommends.

I too was a gm heavy line tech and there is no way I'm recommending anything to customers or friends outside the scope of the manufacture. You open yourself up to all sorts of liability. And when things go side ways no one is siding with the customer because they did something stupid at the behest of some random person on a forums.

What works for you is great. Share your experience. But dont come here convincing everyone how GM is wrong, engineers are wrong, their eyes are wrong, the dipstick is wrong, the design is wrong, but only you are right.

Just my 2 cents.

Appreciate your 2 cents, but something is CLEARLY wrong when the manufacturer delivers and engine with an oil level that is "above spec".

I have been in many industries and I have seen many "specs" be wrong, misprints typos and so forth.

GM is not going to be putting in extra oil in millions vehicles, they would not want to spend the money or they could save plenty of money depending on how you look at things.

I do not recommend anything I would not or am not currently doing. What I am suggesting and doing is not going to cause catastrophic failures and damage. Everyone is going to do what they want to do with their vehicle.

I initially asked if anyone else had seen a similar situation and like all good Internet and Forum members I was immediately roasted and continue to roasted. But guess what I not only have thick skin this ain't my first rodeo and I do my homework. Few have actually objectively looked at the situation, they just repeat "spec says". Well if that is how they roll, nothing I can do or say will help them.

But like anything, everyone has their opinions.

I think most would agree the dipstick design sucks and is misleading regardless of what the "spec" states. But at least we still have a dipstick to use, so many of the newer vehicles have no dipstick and you have to rely on an oil level sensor that hopefully works correctly.

We will see if this thread dies, but I am holding by footing on this and I have had other 6.2l owners that I pointed this out to, they did their own oil changes, started out with 8 quarts and using their own eyes and judgement came to the exact same conclusion I did.

But hey, its just an oil change, nothing special!

 

[DuraYuk]

Appreciate your 2 cents, but something is CLEARLY wrong when the manufacturer delivers and engine with an oil level that is "above spec".

I have been in many industries and I have seen many "specs" be wrong, misprints typos and so forth.

GM is not going to be putting in extra oil in millions vehicles, they would not want to spend the money or they could save plenty of money depending on how you look at things.

I do not recommend anything I would not or am not currently doing. What I am suggesting and doing is not going to cause catastrophic failures and damage. Everyone is going to do what they want to do with their vehicle.

I initially asked if anyone else had seen a similar situation and like all good Internet and Forum members I was immediately roasted and continue to roasted. But guess what I not only have thick skin this ain't my first rodeo and I do my homework. Few have actually objectively looked at the situation, they just repeat "spec says". Well if that is how they roll, nothing I can do or say will help them.

But like anything, everyone has their opinions.

I think most would agree the dipstick design sucks and is misleading regardless of what the "spec" states. But at least we still have a dipstick to use, so many of the newer vehicles have no dipstick and you have to rely on an oil level sensor that hopefully works correctly.

We will see if this thread dies, but I am holding by footing on this and I have had other 6.2l owners that I pointed this out to, they did their own oil changes, started out with 8 quarts and using their own eyes and judgement came to the exact same conclusion I did.

But hey, its just an oil change, nothing special!

You missed the point.
And if you think the dip stick is hard to read than I will leave it at that.

Even a dry sump that has more oil in it can wreak havoc. And that's a dry sump system.

Like many here I'm done with this conversation. People can read and believe what they want.

Wish you luck on your journey of circumventing manufacturer instructions. Hope it works out.

 

[Jetskier77]

I quit watching the Bachelor and The View because the drama here is far more interesting.

 

[jfoj]

As I said, everyone will do what they want to do. I matched the oil level my engine was delivered with and I have seen the same level on many of these engines.

1/8" is not and will not wreck havoc on these or most engines.

 

[Kpwweb]

@Kpwweb and anyone else reading this thread.

Below is a picture of my dipstick with the oil level at 9 quarts. Notice the oil level is just above the top line above the hash marks, maybe 1/8" tops. Matches the same level I found my oil level in the engine when I received the vehicle with 8 miles on it and the same as 2 - 2025 6.2l Yukon that had 7 and 40 miles on them. Other members have seen the same situation.

I had to wait until the oil had some color so you can see the oil easier. Have about 2000 miles since the last oil change and the color is still very light.

Notice how heavy the oil is in the hash marks, it needs to be this way, as I mentioned in the picture that Kpwweb posted above, his oil level is about 2/3 low on the has marks. It is not that oil has flowed to the bottom of the dipstick. The oil must have a thickness as seen in the picture below, This is why there is plenty of confusion of the oil level in these engines.

Take your dipstick and dip it in some used oil 1/2 way up the hash marks and look at it, then do the same at the top of above the hash marks and see what it looks like.

You guys do what you think you want to do, I am running 9 quarts with filter change as are my 2 neighbors with their 2025 as they saw the same oil level in their engines at time of delivery. I am sure I will have PLENTY of "you overfilled your crankcase, the crank will aerate the oil and you will have a crankcase full of foam". Well not the case, I have run 9 quarts of oil for the past 7500 miles and never have I had any problems with foam, oil leaks, oil consumption or any other negative effects. If 1/8" above the top full mark has the crankshaft frothing the engine oil below the windage tray we have bigger problems. I could probably put 1-2 more quarts in the engine before the level would be anywhere near the crankshaft.

For everyone else, enjoy running your engine chronically low on oil.

View attachment 457036

I checked my oil yesterday and it is at the upper mark. The “hash marks” are totally saturated. That is with 8 quarts. No more, no less. It is NOT 2/3 the way down.