Mike's 2013 Tahoe Build

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
Different springs used in different trucks. This is why you get more drop on some trucks than others.

ie my front esclade sits at 33 7/8 thats with a 2.75 inch drop about.

in rear stock was at 38 9/16 where as now it sits at 34 1/2 about a 4 inch drop.

Some autorides sit higher than others I noticed also spring part numbers vary. Either way we will soon find out on measurements who knows I might be way off.
 
OP
OP
mjenk430

mjenk430

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Posts
93
Reaction score
1
Location
Unionville, VA
I'm 4x4 also.

Last time I measured (after my alignment) it was: (posted back on page 4 or 5)

FL 34 3/8" FR 34 5/8"

RL 34 1/8" RR 34 3/8"

I've lengthened the rear autoride links since then but don't recall the measurements, I'll try to get it tonight.

Josh, are you running a 295 or 305 tire? That makes a small difference also.
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
Hum rear looks higher ten that on above pic. Nm saw you changed the links.
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
I'm running a 295 tire.
But idk if it should be a 1 inch difference.
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
Like I said not all springs used are the same some models sit higher depending on springs used from gm. Some trucks sit as high at 38 9/16-3/4 stock in rear
 

Goodinblack

I Like Tacos
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Posts
22,295
Reaction score
3,046
Location
Dirty South
GM uses a Plethora of shocks.......... There are 8-10 different listings for every year.

I found that out when I was recently researching them.........
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
Like I said not all springs used are the same some models sit higher depending on springs used from gm. Some trucks sit as high at 38 9/16-3/4 stock in rear

I think mine sat at 38 in the rear and 35 in front stock because my rack was so terrible it was sickening. And I currently have two inches of rake and can't complain.
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
yeah yours sat low for sure stock. WOndering if yours has the hybrid part number on the springs?
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
don't know but yours does sit low thats for sure.


how are the new spindles doing all worked out?
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
don't know but yours does sit low thats for sure.


how are the new spindles doing all worked out?

Yah everything is good now.
I kinda wanna know why mine sits lower in the front..
Is there somewhere I can run my vin and find out?
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
check front springs and sometimes ive seen different part numbers from side to side where they should have been the same...

look at the tag on the front springs and check it out see what part number you get but who knows what they did at the factory no matter what your front does sit low.
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
check front springs and sometimes ive seen different part numbers from side to side where they should have been the same...

look at the tag on the front springs and check it out see what part number you get but who knows what they did at the factory no matter what your front does sit low.

Hey!
Maybe that's why I needed that camber kit back in the day because my truck sits so low.
Ill look tomorrow.
 

Modded

That Guy
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,942
Reaction score
109
I think mine sat at 38 in the rear and 35 in front stock because my rack was so terrible it was sickening. And I currently have two inches of rake and can't complain.
Has little to do with springs varying from GM. As long as models are similarly equipped (so about equal weight), ride heights are 1/4" difference at best in variance.
Age of the shocks, what the car is used for, and spring sag determine the height more than anything else.
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
Has little to do with springs varying from GM. As long as models are similarly equipped (so about equal weight), ride heights are 1/4" difference at best in variance.
Age of the shocks, what the car is used for, and spring sag determine the height more than anything else.

Well my truck has brand new shocks in front and only 32 thousand miles total on the springs.
 

Modded

That Guy
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,942
Reaction score
109
Well my truck has brand new shocks in front and only 32 thousand miles total on the springs.
Does not matter. 32000 miles on the coils is still a pretty good amount. I bet if I dropped my coils in your Tahoe it would lift up around 1/2".
Coil sag is the reason why the Chevy lean gets worst and worst starting from the time the car is bought new. The gas tank weight weighs down the drivers side coils more and more as time goes on.

---------- Post added at 09:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 PM ----------

Which is nothing....

You know Mike might get annoyed us being on here.....
I can understand that. I probably would too.
 

Blazed

Accepting Donations
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
4,243
Reaction score
10
So theoretically if I replaced the front coils it would sit up more..?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,760
Posts
1,991,384
Members
102,745
Latest member
Buford bubba
Back
Top