Bigburb3500
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
- Posts
- 851
- Reaction score
- 1,333
A lot of what I like on it is the simplicity. No EPA junk on it. Easy to repair engine (L96) and I believe all the 3500s came factory with the 4.10 gear ratio. Yes, the 6.2s do have more torque but the gearing makes a difference + the 6L90 is a “better” transmission that the 6L80. Again, I have not had any of the other trucks. I used to have a 3/4 ton Suburban and just liked the HD version of the K2s.I was just reading this thread and was wondering what the enchantment is (besides novelty) with a 3500 sub. I've been towing for a long time, primarily enclosed trailers loaded with a race car, spares and tools, sometimes tipping 7000-8000lbs. While the diesel trucks are the best with 3/4 ton suspension and 900lbs of TQ, I found my Escalade ESV with an LT6.2 engine can handle the job fine....less a few MPGs. I think tow rating for the ESV is rated the same (8300lbs) as the 3500 Sub but the LT6.2 engines have a boatload more TQ than the 6.0L....460lbs vs. 380lbs.....its a big difference. And its TQ that pulls weight. I got rid of my diesel trucks, because the cost to maintain is so much more than the gassers. So I like 6.2s, DOD deleted! Have 2 LOL. And ESV's are so cheap, sub $20K tow vehicle....and comfortable with a rockin sound system. That being said, if GM made a 2500 Sub with a 6.6 L8T, I'd buy one Today! LOL
I’m in the process of “Cadillac-ing” mine with the Platinums seats. Might be after I repair my steering box. I think the pitman arm seals went bad…
Otherwise, these trucks are novelty but just more robust. I don’t disagree that an ESV Caddy is good but these trucks are limited by the tow bar at 10k, not by the drivetrain. It’s a more stable platform and the L8T fits in REALLY well nice under the hood or a supercharger.