Bilstein 6112 Review at 20,000 miles

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SilverSurfer5300

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Posts
21
Reaction score
70
I installed Bilstein 6112s back in May of '24 and set the collar to setting 3 to level the front with the factory rear shocks (pics and brief install writeup in the "What did you do to your NNBS GMT900 Tahoe/Yukon Today?" thread, page 2366). I've put just over 20,000 miles on them at this point and I thought a review of their performance so far might be appreciated.

*Edit for clarity: While these are marketed as extreme performance off-road coilovers, this review is exclusively of their on-pavement performance. There are ample reviews of their off-road performance on the Tacoma and Tundra forums where this coilover is extremely popular for those applications.

The first 3000 miles were extremely stiff (stiffer than the Bilstein 4600s I had on my '98 Ram 4x4), but somehow they were not unpleasant. Body roll was completely eliminated -even during simulated emergency lane change maneuvers from 30 to 50 mph. I was initially concerned that perhaps I had chosen far too stiff of a shock as there seemed to be almost no compression happening during cornering. Steering response felt more like a sports car than a truck -crisp, precise, technical. Yet surprisingly, given the stiffness, both big and small bumps at speed were absorbed better than anything I've ever felt. At lower speeds however, every pebble and crack in the pavement was felt.

Between 3000 and 5000 miles, there was a noticeable change in the feel of the overall damping, with everything becoming "softer," in what I now attribute to a break-in period. Body roll began to increase through long sweepers and fast lane changes, but still far less body roll than with factory shocks (or the Bilstein 4600s on my Ram). Damping of big and small bumps at speed remained outstanding. At low speed, it began to transmit less and less of the "every crack and pebble" feel and seemed to be becoming more refined. I was initially concerned that at this rate of change, they might wear out prematurely.

Between 5000 and 10,000 miles, the general softening/refining trend continued, but far more gradually than from 3000 to 5000, and with much less overall change than from 3000 to 5000 (at 10,000, they were only very slightly softer than at 5000). Road handling, cornering, body roll, bump handling were all still significantly better than any truck/suv suspension I've experienced.

Between 10,000 and 20,000 miles, there has been no perceptible change to the performance or feel of the shocks. It seems the break-in period for these 6112s was from 3000 to 10,000 miles. The Tahoe is still perfectly-leveled, handling is still outstanding, and comfort is as good or better than factory shocks.

If anyone is on the fence between Bilstein 4600/5100s or 6112s, I can heartily recommend the 6112s.
 
Last edited:

usdlawstudent

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
San Diego
Thanks this is helpful! I’m considering these for my 2010 Denali, which has newish Arnott oem replacement struts, but these feel squishy now that I’ve gotten bigger tires (285x70x17)
 

usdlawstudent

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
San Diego
Also, curious if you did anything for the rears? I’ve been looking at the Bilstein 5162 reservoir shocks, but I have the autoleveling rear shocks, and so I’ll need to find springs and something to bypass the autoleveling circuit. Curious if you had to do that at all with yours.
 

Dustin Jackson

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Posts
1,788
Reaction score
2,064
Bilstein make some darn good shocks that completely change the ride. I put a set of 5100s on Tahoe 6 years ago and put then on my suburban a few months ago. Turned both of them from boats into what I describe as "on rails" just a very confidence inspiring driving experience and they eat up bumps and dips.
 
OP
OP
SilverSurfer5300

SilverSurfer5300

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Posts
21
Reaction score
70
Also, curious if you did anything for the rears? I’ve been looking at the Bilstein 5162 reservoir shocks, but I have the autoleveling rear shocks, and so I’ll need to find springs and something to bypass the autoleveling circuit. Curious if you had to do that at all with yours.
As soon as I bought the Tahoe, I replaced the rear shocks with the OE ones (which were not auto-leveling) because they were totally shot (the fronts were too, but I couldn't tell until I replaced the rears). Looking back, I wish I had upgraded the rear to the Bilstein 5160s, but I wasn't yet planning to level/upgrade the front when I did the rear. As is, it handles great with the factory rears and 6112s in the front. When the rears eventually wear out, the plan is to upgrade to the 5160s.
 
OP
OP
SilverSurfer5300

SilverSurfer5300

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Posts
21
Reaction score
70
Did you measured height from the ground before and after 20k miles?
Great question. I measured after I installed the 6112s, but I have not measured after 20k. Whenever these thunderstorms stop, I'll go outside and take some measurements.
 
OP
OP
SilverSurfer5300

SilverSurfer5300

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Posts
21
Reaction score
70
Did you measured height from the ground before and after 20k miles?
Yes. After the 6112s were installed, the distance from the ground to the inside of the fender was 37.75" (front and rear). I just checked them today and both front and rear are still exactly 37.75".

I'm glad you mentioned this because I plan to keep doing reviews on these shocks every 20k miles or so until they wear out, and I didn't think to track changes to ride height over time. I'll definitely include measurements in future updates.
 

usdlawstudent

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
San Diego
@SilverSurfer5300 interesting. For some reason, I had thought that your truck was the LTZ with the autoleveling (maybe too much websurfing for me). Mine is a Denali and they say the autoleveling shocks work with the springs to maintain the rear height. I’m going in a little bit blind as I’ve got the 5162s on order for the rear with some Dayton HD springs to give a little extra height and compensate for giving up the auto leveling function. Along with the 6112s in the front. I’m torn about having the 6112s on the third or forth clip because I’m hoping to have the ride height look like yours. I’ll probably go with setting 3 an hopefully there isn’t a nose dive
 
OP
OP
SilverSurfer5300

SilverSurfer5300

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Posts
21
Reaction score
70
@SilverSurfer5300 interesting. For some reason, I had thought that your truck was the LTZ with the autoleveling (maybe too much websurfing for me). Mine is a Denali and they say the autoleveling shocks work with the springs to maintain the rear height. I’m going in a little bit blind as I’ve got the 5162s on order for the rear with some Dayton HD springs to give a little extra height and compensate for giving up the auto leveling function. Along with the 6112s in the front. I’m torn about having the 6112s on the third or forth clip because I’m hoping to have the ride height look like yours. I’ll probably go with setting 3 an hopefully there isn’t a nose dive

Mine's just an LT 4x4. Setting 3 gave me a level with factory rears, so if you're going with Dayton HD springs for more lift, you may want to go to setting 4 to keep it level. You'll need to take measurements either way and Bilstein has product info that gives exact lift heights for each setting.
 

SunnyInCo

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Posts
50
Reaction score
30
Thanks this is helpful! I’m considering these for my 2010 Denali, which has newish Arnott oem replacement struts, but these feel squishy now that I’ve gotten bigger tires (285x70x17)
DO you have rubbing or did you need to trim for the 285's? Would it be possible to send a picture?
 

usdlawstudent

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2024
Posts
23
Reaction score
7
Location
San Diego
DO you have rubbing or did you need to trim for the 285's? Would it be possible to send a picture?
I did have rubbing with a 1.5” spacer, mostly at or near full clockwise lockout when backing, but it was enough that I raised it up a bit more to 2.75” in the front with bilstein 6112s + Icon upper control arms, and ~.75” in the rear with Daytona HD springs and Bilstein 5162s. I still had some rubbing afterwards, but on the running boards, but I did some basic diy trimming on the plastic and so I’m rub-free now at full lock in both directions. I love the look of the 285 70, but I’m surprised at how big they are for these wheel wells, and they’re not even 33”! Don’t know how people get away with 33”+ and say they don’t have rubbing.
IMG_2659.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
137,705
Posts
1,990,097
Members
102,699
Latest member
moto
Back
Top