2005 Tahoe PCV Hose Routing

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
The Tahoe (2005 LM7) is giving that telltale sign of a plugged PCV system with a large cloud of blue smoke on startup. It's also leaking oil which is a condition that's getting worse.
Research points to the above condition.
I'm not necessarily asking for the repair procedure as I'm just going to pull the valve covers, starting with the drivers side and give everything in the PCV train a thorough cleaning.
That brings me to my question.
What exactly is the PCV hose routing? I ask because the web is full of conflicting information and much of that is tied to these engines being installed in vehicles other than what they were originally and the hose routing is modified to remedy the problem that plagues them. That would be in addition to the new and improved valve cover that GM specs in a TSB.
I've got:
PCV valve/fixed orifice hose from the L.S. valve cover to the intake plenum.
A hose to to the throttle body from the R.S. valve cover.
Is there a 3rd hose? Our hot rod LS3 has a hose from the valley pan to the intake tube but no such thing exists on this stock LM& (5.3)
There is more a curiosity adventure more than anything but this inquiring mind wants to know.
Thanks in advance.
 

OR VietVet

GMT800 2005 Tahoe Z71
Navy Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
23,683
Reaction score
44,084
Location
Willamette Valley
The Tahoe (2005 LM7) is giving that telltale sign of a plugged PCV system with a large cloud of blue smoke on startup. It's also leaking oil which is a condition that's getting worse.
Research points to the above condition.
I'm not necessarily asking for the repair procedure as I'm just going to pull the valve covers, starting with the drivers side and give everything in the PCV train a thorough cleaning.
That brings me to my question.
What exactly is the PCV hose routing? I ask because the web is full of conflicting information and much of that is tied to these engines being installed in vehicles other than what they were originally and the hose routing is modified to remedy the problem that plagues them. That would be in addition to the new and improved valve cover that GM specs in a TSB.
I've got:
PCV valve/fixed orifice hose from the L.S. valve cover to the intake plenum.
A hose to to the throttle body from the R.S. valve cover.
Is there a 3rd hose? Our hot rod LS3 has a hose from the valley pan to the intake tube but no such thing exists on this stock LM& (5.3)
There is more a curiosity adventure more than anything but this inquiring mind wants to know.
Thanks in advance.
You will never get the PCV system cleaned out on the D/S valve cover. You will clean it some but it will not last. When I see the clogged LS pcv systems signs, the smoke and the oil leaks, I am putting on a new valve cover, at least the D/S but always do both. Then fix the oil leaks.
 
OP
OP
A

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
You will never get the PCV system cleaned out on the D/S valve cover. You will clean it some but it will not last. When I see the clogged LS pcv systems signs, the smoke and the oil leaks, I am putting on a new valve cover, at least the D/S but always do both. Then fix the oil leaks.
Fair comment and I have no illusions as to what I'm contemplating will solve the problem. It's more along the lines will it alleviate the problem and then I have a direction on where to go. A cause and effect sort of thing.
It used to be, before any of these buggies existed (this generation of LM7 that is) that oil smoke on starting pointed to valve guides and oil smoke under full load indicated piston rings.
That said, is the PCV on these engines limited to the two lines? D.S. cover to intake and P.S. cover to throttle body or is there something more?
I'd like to address them all in the simplest way possible and then go from there.
 
OP
OP
A

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
Other posts have popped up since I answered the first.
Especially the oil smoke on start up. Seems the clogged PCV will result in oil pooling in the intake plenum. Then it's ingested when next started.
To the poster that mentioned valve guides...yes sir. That was my initial thought. Then this whole PCV issue came to light.
Thus, my approach to picking the low hanging fruit, so to speak.
 
OP
OP
A

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
Yes. 706 heads.
Interestingly that may be the problem with one of the other Tahoe's in the "fleet".
The 03 has two weak cylinders. 5 and 7 with one at about 70 psi cranking pressure and the other around 130. Doesn't appear to be a head gasket and the suspicion is a couple of burnt valves.
Not that it matters as that truck is due to be parted out and the carcass hauled off to the recycler.
 
OP
OP
A

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
Now, back to the thread title.
Is there a valley pan hose in these engines? Which would be a 3rd hose. I don't see it.
FTR, the crate engine LS3 we have does have one.
 

mikez71

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Posts
3,200
Reaction score
3,953
I don't see a third hose in diagrams. Does the crate ls3 have a connection to both valve covers as well?


I wonder if that engine with low compression on 5&7, could have a gasket leak between cylinders? Not sure if that could cause burnt valves, since there is a fairly large difference in compression still..
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
A

Alberta Tahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
57
I'll have to check the LS3.
It's been hot rodded and is in a 69 C10 so the original layout is just a memory. There may be something in the picture history though.
As for the head gasket, that was an initial thought although, as stated, the difference in compression kind of points otherwise.
If I can manage it (but doubtful) I'd like to pull that engine and do a refresh/rebuild. Then I'll know. It would make for a handy spare or easily sold.
 

Fless

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Posts
16,280
Reaction score
33,639
Location
People's Republic of Colorado
Now, back to the thread title.
Is there a valley pan hose in these engines? Which would be a 3rd hose. I don't see it.
FTR, the crate engine LS3 we have does have one.

No. Just knock sensor pits.

1780581772071.png
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,691
Posts
1,989,680
Members
102,691
Latest member
RobK
Back
Top