00-01 Cat back different than 02-06

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

drdave81

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Posts
261
Reaction score
401
Location
Waterford, MI
I can't seem to find why the cat back exhaust systems are different for 00-01 from 02-06 for the Denalis. I even reached out to Magnaflow why their cat back is only listed for 02-06 and they couldn't give me any better answer than "our engineers must have seen something different". Does anyone know what would be different? Magnaflow and I think it was Gibson all list 02-06 for applications for their cat backs, 00-01 is not applicable.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Check the Walker Dynomax website and see if they show the difference, if any. On my generation, the difference is in the type of flange used after the cats. The early version used 2 bolts and the later ones used a clamp for example.
 
OP
OP
drdave81

drdave81

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Posts
261
Reaction score
401
Location
Waterford, MI
Check the Walker Dynomax website and see if they show the difference, if any. On my generation, the difference is in the type of flange used after the cats. The early version used 2 bolts and the later ones used a clamp for example.
They don't list a cat back for any of the 00-06 6.0L, only the 5.3L. I'm starting to think it'll just be easier (and cheaper) to just put a whole 5.3 exhaust, from long tubes all the way back on instead of a 6.0L. My main concern is I keep seeing 5.3 headers and y-pipe may or may not fit nicely. Tonyrodz had to completely pull his front drive shaft out for his headers/Y-pipe. Not an option for AWD.

Where as the ARH headers or Kooks guarantee fitment. Hefty price tag on them though, and then I'm running into this unknown cat back issue lol. I'd also have to find a place somewhere in the system to weld in a converter, since I don't want all the added noise of catless exhaust.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
They don't list a cat back for any of the 00-06 6.0L, only the 5.3L. I'm starting to think it'll just be easier (and cheaper) to just put a whole 5.3 exhaust, from long tubes all the way back on instead of a 6.0L. My main concern is I keep seeing 5.3 headers and y-pipe may or may not fit nicely. Tonyrodz had to completely pull his front drive shaft out for his headers/Y-pipe. Not an option for AWD.

Where as the ARH headers or Kooks guarantee fitment. Hefty price tag on them though, and then I'm running into this unknown cat back issue lol. I'd also have to find a place somewhere in the system to weld in a converter, since I don't want all the added noise of catless exhaust.
On the generation following yours, the 5.3 and 6.0 exhausts are the same. The 6.2s got 3.5" tubing.
 

mikeyss

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Posts
1,755
Reaction score
3,389
Location
Longmont, Colorado.
00-01 the egr was different, but that was up at the passenger side exhaust manifold.

Screenshot_20220417-080405.png
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
The 6.0L was different on the 00-06. It's a dual inlet to the muffler, with a single outlet. So there is no Y-pipe.

Thanks for the info! I reckon then that one could just utilize just about any 3" single configuration to good effect.

00-01 the egr was different, but that was up at the passenger side exhaust manifold.
Hey Mike! How have you been?
 

adventurenali92

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Posts
7,721
Reaction score
9,172
Location
Big Bear Lake, ca
The 6.0L was different on the 00-06. It's a dual inlet to the muffler, with a single outlet. So there is no Y-pipe.


this isn’t entirely correct. When I pulled the factory muffler out of my 2006 Denali with an LQ4 6.0, it had dual in/out pipes and a Y just behind it to go to the single passenger side exhaust exit piping. Which is why I stayed with a dual in dual out magnaflow muffler.
 
OP
OP
drdave81

drdave81

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Posts
261
Reaction score
401
Location
Waterford, MI
this isn’t entirely correct. When I pulled the factory muffler out of my 2006 Denali with an LQ4 6.0, it had dual in/out pipes and a Y just behind it to go to the single passenger side exhaust exit piping. Which is why I stayed with a dual in dual out magnaflow muffler.
I was referring to a Y-pipe coming from the manifolds into the muffler. This is what makes the 6.0L exhaust set up different than the 5.3, which has a Y-pipe and a single inlet at the muffler.
Interesting that they did that though.
 

adventurenali92

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Posts
7,721
Reaction score
9,172
Location
Big Bear Lake, ca
I was referring to a Y-pipe coming from the manifolds into the muffler. This is what makes the 6.0L exhaust set up different than the 5.3, which has a Y-pipe and a single inlet at the muffler.
Interesting that they did that though.
Oh I see what you’re saying.
 

HD_LS

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Posts
80
Reaction score
73
If anyone is interested in buying it, I have a complete 6.0 Denali/ Escalade Magnaflow exhaust, with the 3.5 inch diameter muffler back pipe size & 4 inch tip. Used only about 200 miles...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,688
Posts
1,989,635
Members
102,689
Latest member
Woned2004
Back
Top