New OEM O2 sensors

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mijohnst

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Posts
268
Reaction score
297
I just ordered 2 new upstream sensors for my 2005 Tahoe and noticed after I installed them that the connections weres almost too short. There is literally no play. Has anyone else had that issue?
 

drakon543

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Posts
2,473
Reaction score
1,722
yes that's definitely possible especially if you opted for some cheaper aftermarket ones. with aftermarket ones ive had to reroute a bit on different vehicles to get some extra slack. ive also had the opposite and ended up with way too much. oem ones tend to be more vehicle specific where aftermarket ones will group matching o2 sensors with style and plug and give it enough cable so its more universal. nothing wrong with it you might just have to unclip the cable somewhere to give yourself some extra slack.
 

OR VietVet

GMT800 2005 Tahoe Z71
Navy Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
23,721
Reaction score
44,165
Location
Willamette Valley
I just ordered 2 new upstream sensors for my 2005 Tahoe and noticed after I installed them that the connections weres almost too short. There is literally no play. Has anyone else had that issue?


When you say oem I am assuming that you got AC Delco. Is this the part number for them because these are listed as up stream: https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=438154&cc=1431156&jsn=2249

These are listed as downstream: https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=539430&cc=1431156&jsn=2248

This is a Delphi listed as upstream: https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=1323899&cc=1431156&jsn=2250

This is a Delphi listed as downstream: https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=1323557&cc=1431156&jsn=2253
 
OP
OP
mijohnst

mijohnst

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Posts
268
Reaction score
297
Well, I'm a *******. I figured it out. I *thought* I bought new upstream O2 sensors...and so that's where I put the ones I bought. Thank you for posting the links, Ron. I went back and looked and it turns out that I bought 2 downstream sensors and put them in the wrong spots and that's why the wires were too short. Live and learn... thanks again for the help guys!
 

mattbta

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Posts
1,185
Reaction score
2,218
Location
Frisco, TX
My 2002 Tahoe is the same, all 4 sensors are the same part #.
Yeah, I panicked after I saw your post listing different upstream/downstream as I replaced all 4 of mine (2004 Flex) with a single part number. Went to the delco site and put in 2005 and sure enough they were different. Then put in my model year and listed only the single. Whew.
 

OR VietVet

GMT800 2005 Tahoe Z71
Navy Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
23,721
Reaction score
44,165
Location
Willamette Valley
I have not had to replace mine since I have owned it, 4 years, but I have looked ahead just in case. Mike has the 05, so yes, things can change year to year and that is why I BEG all members to put their rig info in their signature. People get in one forum, 2000-2006, and when we look for info that can be different year to year. C'mon man.
 
OP
OP
mijohnst

mijohnst

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Posts
268
Reaction score
297
I think that they're all the same except with the OEM the upstream has a longer wire so it can reach the connector. I bet GM saved hundreds and hundreds of dollars by using less wire on those downstream O2 units.
 

OR VietVet

GMT800 2005 Tahoe Z71
Navy Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Posts
23,721
Reaction score
44,165
Location
Willamette Valley
I think that they're all the same except with the OEM the upstream has a longer wire so it can reach the connector. I bet GM saved hundreds and hundreds of dollars by using less wire on those downstream O2 units.


You can bet they did. Years ago, when the feds got on car manufacturers about meeting fuel mileage, that was when brake drums and rotors got thinner-to save weight, more plastic was used, the vehicles became more aerodynamic.......you get the jist. The same goes for saving money on each little thing to drive profits up.
 

George B

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Posts
7,882
Reaction score
18,994
Location
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin 53066

Fless

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Posts
16,333
Reaction score
33,774
Location
People's Republic of Colorado
I think that they're all the same except with the OEM the upstream has a longer wire so it can reach the connector. I bet GM saved hundreds and hundreds of dollars by using less wire on those downstream O2 units.


I'd think they would save more money by eliminating a second style of O2 sensor -- more quantities of one style and only one to document, stock, market, sell, etc. But whadda I know?
 

wjburken

Elite Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Posts
10,314
Reaction score
29,540
Location
Eastern Iowa
I'd think they would save more money by eliminating a second style of O2 sensor -- more quantities of one style and only one to document, stock, market, sell, etc. But whadda I know?

20 years ago I went to some training for a design and we were to bring an actual design problem we were trying to solve. One gal was from GM and her problem was to find a way to take 2 cents out of some common component like a muffler hanger or something. I asked how it was cost effective to spend the time to save that little of an amount and she said the volume that they use them, it would end up saving almost $500K in a just a year.

This is also why some building codes are starting to require outlets to be 6ft apart instead of 8ft because lamp makers were making the cords shorter to save money.
 

HiHoeSilver

Away!
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
10,918
Reaction score
14,578
Location
Chicago
20 years ago I went to some training for a design and we were to bring an actual design problem we were trying to solve. One gal was from GM and her problem was to find a way to take 2 cents out of some common component like a muffler hanger or something. I asked how it was cost effective to spend the time to save that little of an amount and she said the volume that they use them, it would end up saving almost $500K in a just a year.

This is also why some building codes are starting to require outlets to be 6ft apart instead of 8ft because lamp makers were making the cords shorter to save money.

Around here (Chicago IBEW mecca), building codes require (and have for decades) receptacles every 12 feet, as to accommodate a 6' lamp cord in either direction.

I have never heard of 8 or 6'. Unless it's a countertop. Then it's 4' (and within 2' of the end), as most appliance cords are 3'.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,760
Posts
1,991,396
Members
102,746
Latest member
Big Jim

Latest posts

Back
Top