TVS or Whipple on 5.3?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ls1frc

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
911
Reaction score
1,343
Anyone have any experience with the 1900 TVS or 2300 whipple on a 5.3? Curious about part throttle drivability. I wouldn't want it to be like a light switch going off.

Don't see much info here regarding superchargers.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
6,335
Reaction score
12,433
Location
St. Louis
No experience with either of those on a 5.3, but the supercharger on my mustang has a bypass valve that's hooked to a vacuum line and stays open until the vacuum drops to a set point then closes, allowing boost pressure into the intake.

Engine intakes are under vacuum during no or part throttle, then as throttle (or load on the engine) increases the vacuum lessens and will be at 0 at full throttle.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

BlackBearPerf

Supporting Vendor
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Posts
2,028
Reaction score
1,688
Location
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
Anyone have any experience with the 1900 TVS or 2300 whipple on a 5.3? Curious about part throttle drivability. I wouldn't want it to be like a light switch going off.

Don't see much info here regarding superchargers.
Hope this helps, this is from our tuner who has been running Magnachargers, Whipple and Edelbrock on his daily drivers for years.

Magnacharger and Edelbrock bypasses are set up for smoother boost application.

On his Whipple'd 6.2L, if you are riding right at the edge of boost and increase throttle by just 1%, it can go from 2" vacuum to 2psi of boost instantly, resulting in a bit jerky of a drive.
 
OP
OP
L

ls1frc

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
911
Reaction score
1,343
Awesome that makes the decision easy then. I don't want to have weird drivability issues and the bypass valve is what I was worried about.
 

gat0r

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Posts
3,106
Reaction score
5,828
Location
DFW
i drive a '15 w/ a 1900 on a 5.3
drivability is great.
power is gradual, unless you treat the throttle like an on/off switch. ;)
 
OP
OP
L

ls1frc

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
911
Reaction score
1,343
So my 5.3 with cam, headers, heads rips pretty good from 3500 and up. It is anemic from 0-20. Doing a roll from 20-60 actually pushes me back in the seat. 0-20 feels like it takes longer than 20-40.

I could do a 6.2 or bolt a TVS 2300 on for the same price. Which would you do? 5.3 has 145k on it but has new lifters, oil pump etc.

The thing I like about doing the blower is it's less hassle then tearing the truck back down again.

The thing I like about the 6.2 is it's simple.

Both will net similar gains.
 

gat0r

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Posts
3,106
Reaction score
5,828
Location
DFW
get both ;)

do 6.2 swap, then save up for TVS/whipple.
by the time you save up & get used to the 6.2... its time to add supercharger
:anitoof::driver:


supercharger would be easier. but face it, we always want more power :D
 
OP
OP
L

ls1frc

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
911
Reaction score
1,343
Low mileage 6.2s cost around 3500 to 4k. Maybe recoup 1k from my long block?

I can get the blower setup for around 5k.

Really the labor involved isnt bad for the engine swap. Only thing I am unsure of is how to get the engine up my driveway off the freight truck.
 
OP
OP
L

ls1frc

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Posts
911
Reaction score
1,343
I'd do the blower and if the 5.3 dies in a few years put a 6 2 under it.

Was thinking the same. I am trying to find out from Magnuson what would have to change on the blower for it to fit square port heads if I ended up changing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
129,117
Posts
1,810,726
Members
92,204
Latest member
22loweryak
Top