Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
i know what ya meant Felix, just breaking ur balls... LOL

I'm new here...first post actually. Just thought I'd chime in because I just went through the same thought process. I was considering a new/used Tahoe/Yukon vs a used Denali (Escalade's GMC equivalent) and ended up with a Certified Pre-owned 2009 Denali, fully loaded w/ 20" chrome wheels and NAV.
I've always been one to go for the top end model because they do hold their value better as time goes on and are generally more desirable. This makes it easier to get top dollar at trade-in time if kept clean or easier to sell if you want to sell it privately.
First of all, here are some facts about Certified Pre-owned. You will get a 12 month and 12,000 mile bumper to bumper warranty. This also makes it eligible to get a very affordable bumper to bumper extension. I extended mine to 5yrs (from in-service date) / 100,000 miles for $1200. Since my Denali has 31k miles and it's in-service date was Oct 2009, I basically have 3 yrs and 69k miles from now with bumper to bumper protection. Of course you could extend the warranty on the new Tahoe as well...
Look at it this way...The Escalade is a much nicer overall vehicle that will hold the value much better, you can get an equivalent or better warranty and you will have a higher trade in value the next time around. I've done the math a thousand times...you lose the most when you buy new. CPO's are the way to go financially. The biggest benefit is that you will get to drive a much nicer vehicle for the same upfront price price. The Escalade is just a much nicer vehicle than the Tahoe.
Hope this helps and good luck! Please make sure you post back here when you make your decision too!
JP (The New Guy)
If it was me I would go Esky. As long as the Esky does have lower miles. Within the next few years I will be switching to a Esky but prob get a used one with low miles. I just like the way they look and interior is so much nicer and flows better then the Tahoes. With all the add ons I did I should have gotten a Esky but when I bought mine it was only a year since they came out with the new models and Esky were way out of my price back then.
I completely agree with all of this good point Brent. I definitely couldn't have afforded the Esky at 70k but when it was time to get another vehicle and I had the option between the two I found that used Denali's and Escalade's with the same mileage were around the same price as that of a newer Tahoe. Having already owned a Tahoe I test drove the other two and fell in love with em. Just food for thought-- definitely test drive the Esky and you will feel the difference!
holy guacamole I had no idea the MPG was that bad!![]()
haha yea it's pretty bad. My avalanche is way better and gets 15.4 mpg. Several factors contributing to this though-- the 5.3L vs 6.2L, Active Fuel Managemen, 20's instead of 22's, and 4x4 instead of AWD (which stays in 2wd most of the time).
Interesting, my buddy who just got rid of his said he was getting around 13-14 avg with 16 on highway, but he did have an 11 so I guess he had active fuel mgmt. That might make me look at 2010's then honestly. 10mpg isn't much better than my Dad's VIPER!
You're saying the AWD is more of a drain on the fuel mileage? If you are getting 10.2 to 10.5, do you just have a lead foot and are using all 400 of those ponies around town??
I don't speed but i'm definitely not driving like a grandpa around town lol.

Wow tough question on that one. If it was me, though, I'd choose the '09. You'll take an immediate hit on depreciation when you drive that '11 off the lot which will make it worth less than the '09 Esky immediately even, though, they have the same price tag. The Esky will also have significantly more creature comforts to it and more pleasurable to drive.