Cold Air Intake (CAI) on 2013 6.2L - worth doing?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Doubeleive

Wes
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
30,552
Reaction score
48,016
Location
Stockton, Ca.
My bad, gov.
Shoulda rang @Rocket Man about MpG gains due to lowering.
"Reducing the height and width of the car can reduce the frontal area, but there is a limit to how small this area can be since people must be able to sit comfortably inside the vehicle. Therefore, the easiest method of decreasing drag is to lower the coefficient of drag of the car [3]. The coefficient of drag of a vehicle depends predominantly on the shape (Fig. 2). Therefore, vehicle designers change specific aspects of the shape of the body of the vehicle in order to reduce the total aerodynamic drag and thus increase fuel economy."
ref: https://illumin.usc.edu/drag-reduction-the-pursuit-of-better-fuel-economy/
 

Doubeleive

Wes
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
30,552
Reaction score
48,016
Location
Stockton, Ca.
I am sure there is some give & take in Vehicle design between what is visually appealing, is quiet, roomy and etc and also economical and able to be mass produced at a profit.
a lowered vehicle may scrape on the ground, be more prone to collecting mud & dirt and water exposure, etc...
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
7,124
Reaction score
14,375
Location
St. Louis
Um, no thanks?
Last time I hit a small pothole with a minivan, the minivan was all,
'Wanh. I need a new tire and strut.'
The Z71 thinks it's just a bump.
I was referring to lowered SUVs. They look like mini vans and have about the same people/cargo space.
 

Marky Dissod

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Posts
4,103
Reaction score
5,928
Location
(718)-
Ah.
In that case, yes, minivans become much more competitive with LOWERED bubbas / XLs.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
My bad, gov.
Shoulda rang @Rocket Man about MpG gains due to lowering.
Wha? Why would you ring me about ANYTHING related to MPG? I’m running a cam, blower, headers, etc and lowering was done to improve looks and handling. I get about 8 mpg depending on how I drive, I can get a 10mpg average if I stay off the pedal long enough but I don’t and I don’t care. :yaoface2: :p ;)
 
Last edited:

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
I gained 2 MPG when I lowered mine and removed the roof rack. I also reduced the rake, but kept a noticeable amount. The rake angle is a factor in their aerodynamic design. Level or worse, squatted, would increase drag. They have a little more rake than necessary to have more rear travel when loaded or towing, sacrificing a tiny amount of optimum aerodynamics. I rarely tow or haul and have air bags so I opted for maximum slipperiness. The 22s cost me a solid 1 MPG.
 
OP
OP
LurkingLuke

LurkingLuke

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2023
Posts
88
Reaction score
84
Location
WA
[Not really an] Update:

Yukon is in the collision repair shop (thank you, ma'am, for not knowing how to leave a parking space without scraping my bumper) for 2 weeks. Will have to wait to install CAI.
 
OP
OP
LurkingLuke

LurkingLuke

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2023
Posts
88
Reaction score
84
Location
WA
The Yukon is back from repairs and paint, ready to install CAI. Except I need to get myself psyched a bit more first. I have no garage, nor even a carport, nor even a tent (I had a superb and affordable tent not long ago).

When I don't mind the weather quite so much, I'll swap to the [dry---no washing and oiling required] K&N CAI and let you have a listen/look at the results. TTYS!

- Luke
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,764
Posts
1,991,543
Members
102,752
Latest member
worleytrev93

Latest posts

Back
Top