StephenPT
Full Access Member
Pretty good explanation of the Stribeck Curve and why GM is recommending 0W-40 for 6.2 engines which have improper surface finish on the crankshaft journals.
- start watching at the 4:30 mark.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Oh boy, where is my popcorn???Pretty good explanation of the Stribeck Curve and why GM is recommending 0W-40 for 6.2 engines which have improper surface finish on the crankshaft journals.
- start watching at the 4:30 mark.
There were a couple people who have been on the forum who have had 2 engines replaced, and another gentleman who had 2 engines blow, then GM bought his back, and his replacement vehicle engine blew.I have a question. Given that a number of folks in this chat have had two or three engine replacements going into a single vehicle - does this suggest that there is an additional problem elsewhere in the powertrain?
Some sources are claiming the engine failure rate is much closer to 5%, and this could be understated/under reported. I believe the 3% figure everyone keeps stating is the value that GM stated was loss of propulsion. Somewhat creative in their statement of engine failures. I believe I have only read/heard about as many as I can count on 1 hand that did not fail at highway speed, I am sure there may be more, but this is the number I have discovered with a lot of reading and research.There were a couple people who have been on the forum who have had 2 engines replaced, and another gentleman who had 2 engines blow, then GM bought his back, and his replacement vehicle engine blew.
Now statistics says, the probability of something happening more than once is simply the product of the event happening once.
So, if the fail rate is 3%, and a single person had it happen 3 times, the probability of that happening is:
P = 0.03 x 0.03 x 0.03
P = 0.000027 = 27/1,000,000
Time for that guy to buy a lottery ticket, or there was something about his driving or vehicle loading that exacerbated the failure.
...... or there was something about his driving, or (his) vehicle loading that exacerbated the failure ...
Well, that is presumably covered by the recall and the predicted 3% fail rate......
OR
there's something about what GM did, or failed to do, with an unusually high number of L87s.
Honestly, haven't heard a lot of lifter failure noise here on the forum since the early 2021 timeframe...we will see as more folks get out to the neighborhood of 100k, but that particular issue seems really quiet lately.Then there are problems with the DFM system, typically valve lifters either being stuck collapsed or the needle bearings in the roller end of the lifter fail and often take the camshaft out with the lifter(s). The issue is we have all been hyper focused on the engine failures and with some engines being replaced they are still pretty low on mileage. Time will tell if the lifter/camshaft problems are more limited with the later builds and if GM did something to improve the lifter/camshaft reliability. I feel more frequent oil changes will hopefully reduce the possibility of lifter/camshaft problems. Maintenance is about the only variable you can control on most vehicles so more frequent oil changes may help reduce the failure rate.