@zbad55
I have a 2005 GMC Yukon Denali which I still drive daily (275,000 miles and counting), just had to move it to drive my 2024 GMC Yukon Denali to warm it up to change the oil. My 2024 6.2l Yukon is not within the Recall VIN range. The 6.2l in my Yukon was built July 15, 2024, 2 weeks outside of the recall cut off window. Does this mean I am in the safe zone, it should, but I do not run 0W20 oil in my engine, dumped it at 544 miles and never looking back. Additionally none of the 2024 6.2l have coated rod bearings, I cannot figure out 100% when the coated rod bearings were dropped, I am pretty sure the L86 had coated rod bearings but either with the start of the L87 or early on in the L87 manufacturing window the coated rod bearings were dropped.
I have a very negative view of most of the automotive industry these days. Not just GM but many of the manufacturers. Stupid decisions made daily, many may have started as wise, solid ideas, but by the time deadlines and dollars are questioned, things change quickly. Too many foolish ideas to try and obtain good fuel economy out of 6000 lb vehicles that impacts the drivetrain reliability. I doubt I will ever see anything as reliable as my 2005 6.0l Yukon, went into the dealer 1 time since new for a replacement NAV radio, al other repairs done by me and nothing crazy expensive, the engine and transmission have never been opened up.
When deadlines and dollars run the show, safety margins are tossed out. Does not really what Engineering thinks or wants, they get told to sit down and be quiet. I have seen this many times before and know it still goes on daily in many manufacturers. I have insiders in both US and Japanese manufacturers that I get info from on a regular basis. The Japanese are up against the same deadline and dollar problem as well.
Vehicles have become too expensive and the profit margins have shrunk for the manufacturer and dealers. Not much money made in new vehicles anymore.
Well aware of the crankshaft problems, it had to do with final journal finish which was not smooth enough for 0W20 engine oil. The thinner the engine oil, the smoother the crankshaft journals need to be. If theses engines still had coated rod bearings, the failure rate would be so much lower and there would not likely be a recall on these engines even with the crankshaft surface finish not being smooth enough.
As for safety margin, the reason GM is putting 0W40 in the recalled engines that "Passed" the Pico test is to give more safety margin for bearing life. GM really won't and did not spec 0W40 for replacement engines or the other non recalled engines because the vehicles were certified by the EPA with 0W20 oil AND if GM now pivoted and said all 6.2l and possible 5.3l engines should run 0W40 oil the lawsuits and reimbursements for failed engines that were not covered by warranty would be piling up and GM would likely go broke or at least be in serious trouble for years to come both financially and from buyers going elsewhere.
I am tired of hearing about ALL the MILLIONS of engines run fine on 0W20 oil, some do, but do the math for the bearing loading to see what oil these higher Torque engine should be running and it will not be 0W20.