AFM disabler and mpg?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Caligirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
138
Location
California
Been searching but couldn't find the answer....I'm probably going to be doing city (mountain) mileage for most of my driving accept for occasional road trips, so how much mpg can I expect to realistically get with the disabler installed vs AFM active on a 2007 Tahoe 4wd LMG? Will I still get 20 mpg hwy without AFM active? I expect mountain driving to be on the low end. Right now it switches back and forth between V8 and V4 every couple of minutes in my regular drive. Thanks!
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,758
Reaction score
44,620
Location
Li'l Weezyana
How much it will affect depends on how much it's actually engaged. When I had mine tuned out, I lost .5 - 1 MPG in my usual areas of travel. There are so many stars that need to align for AFM to be of any benefit: Long stretches of flat and straight road, no headwind, speeds under 70MPH, no traffic, dead-still foot or use of cruise control, etc. EVEN IF your driving scenarios manage to keep AFM engaged for the majority of the time, the amount saved in fuel won't ever compare to the cost of the damage that can be done if there's a failure within the system. That ~1, maybe 2 MPG you lose from disabling or deleting it is mere pennies. It won't be missed. BTW, since I deleted AFM with a performance cam and other upgrades, I'm now averaging the same or better MPG as I did with a stock engine and AFM.
 
OP
OP
C

Caligirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
138
Location
California
How much it will affect depends on how much it's actually engaged. When I had mine tuned out, I lost .5 - 1 MPG in my usual areas of travel. There are so many stars that need to align for AFM to be of any benefit: Long stretches of flat and straight road, no headwind, speeds under 70MPH, no traffic, dead-still foot or use of cruise control, etc. EVEN IF your driving scenarios manage to keep AFM engaged for the majority of the time, the amount saved in fuel won't ever compare to the cost of the damage that can be done if there's a failure within the system. That ~1, maybe 2 MPG you lose from disabling or deleting it is mere pennies. It won't be missed. BTW, since I deleted AFM with a performance cam and other upgrades, I'm now averaging the same or better MPG as I did with a stock engine and AFM.

That's good to hear. I figured I'd not be getting much everyday benefit from AFM with the winding roads and up and down hills on my "big" 15 miles of driving each day. After looking at what folks want for a 2011 or 2012 with similar mileage with less AFM issues, I think putting money into this 2007 will still be cheaper.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,758
Reaction score
44,620
Location
Li'l Weezyana
That's good to hear. I figured I'd not be getting much everyday benefit from AFM with the winding roads and up and down hills on my "big" 15 miles of driving each day. After looking at what folks want for a 2011 or 2012 with similar mileage with less AFM issues, I think putting money into this 2007 will still be cheaper.

Your short commute and terrain makes having AFM even less valuable. With the low mileage your Tahoe has and with taking a few smart proactive measures, it should be a reliable and useful vehicle for a long time. You got a good deal on it, wisely invest a little and keep it a good deal.


The short list if it were mine:

(1) Have AFM tuned out. I prefer the tune method over a plug-in because it's cheap, permanent, doesn't screw with a bunch of other stuff for when it's time for your inspections, doesn't occupy the ALDL port and doesn't drain your battery.

(2) Remove the driver side valve cover to see if it's the updated one and replace it if not.

(3) Check the numbers engraved on the front edge of the VLOM to see if it's the updated one. It doesn't matter if it's not since AFM will be disabled, but you'd wanna know just to get an idea if the system has ever been serviced.

(4) Get a GOOD tune. You can tie this one in with having AFM turned off. There are so many benefits with a tune that would prolong the life of the 4L60E as well as improve the responsiveness. Speaking of trans, I'd recommend the installation of a Corvette servo.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
C

Caligirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
133
Reaction score
138
Location
California
Your short commute and terrain makes having AFM even less valuable. With the low mileage your Tahoe has and with taking a few smart proactive measures, it should be a reliable and useful vehicle for a long time. You got a good deal on it, wisely invest a little and keep it a good deal.


The short list f it were mine:

(1) Have AFM tuned out. I prefer the tune method over a plug-in because it's cheap, permanent, doesn't screw with a bunch of other stuff for when it's time for your inspections, doesn't occupy the ALDL port and doesn't drain your battery.

(2) Remove the driver side valve cover to see if it's the updated one and replace it if not.

(3) Check the numbers engraved on the front edge of the VLOM to see if it's the updated one. It doesn't matter if it's not since AFM will be disabled, but you'd wanna know just to get an idea if the system has ever been serviced.

(4) Get a GOOD tune. You can tie this one in with having AFM turned off. There are so many benefits with a tune that would prolong the life of the 4L60E as well as improve the responsiveness. Speaking of trans, I'd recommend the installation of a Corvette servo.

Thanks much! I think I'll screenshot this response and give it to my husband as my laundry list haha.

I'm so appreciative of all of the assistance; it makes me feel better about keeping it. With this old of a vehicle, I was really hesitant to begin with, but I now know that not as many things could go wrong (beyond the normal wear and tear of an older vehicle) than I thought. Was getting red flags from reading the doom and gloom about the 2007, but sounds like worth it in the long run to get a reliable vehicle on the cheap.

Heck my husband's coworker got a brand new GM truck in 2016 and has already had to replace the transmission last year and had all kinds of problems and that's with a $50000 truck! I know it was under warranty, but still I think I'd rather invest a thousand into this one than wondering if my new vehicle is going to crap out AFTER warranty.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,758
Reaction score
44,620
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Thanks much! I think I'll screenshot this response and give it to my husband as my laundry list haha.

I'm so appreciative of all of the assistance; it makes me feel better about keeping it. With this old of a vehicle, I was really hesitant to begin with, but I now know that not as many things could go wrong (beyond the normal wear and tear of an older vehicle) than I thought. Was getting red flags from reading the doom and gloom about the 2007, but sounds like worth it in the long run to get a reliable vehicle on the cheap.

Heck my husband's coworker got a brand new GM truck in 2016 and has already had to replace the transmission last year and had all kinds of problems and that's with a $50000 truck! I know it was under warranty, but still I think I'd rather invest a thousand into this one than wondering if my new vehicle is going to crap out AFTER warranty.


I think there's so much negativity more specific to the '07 since that was the first year for the new design and for AFM, so everyone put it under a microscope and heavily criticized it.

My opinion is that the Gen 3 engine ('99-'07.5, the '07.5+ is a Gen 4) is the most reliable GM small block ever. The Gen 4 has upgraded components for durability, power output and efficiency, but AFM counters this. Take AFM outta the equation and you'll have a better engine than the Gen 3, as it should be. I believe the reliability of the vehicles as a whole has gotten worse since.

Mine is an '08, so it's virtually identical to your '07. I bought it with 146K miles, had AFM turned off around 160K-170K (estimating) to solve a shuddering problem and beat on it from there on. At 200K, after a night at the racetrack to get some baselines, I pulled the engine to refresh it since I didn't plan on keeping it forever but I wanted to delete AFM and have a good look at the internals. Compression was great, cylinder walls and bearing surfaces looked great and there wasn't a speck of sludge to be found. I replaced the critical wear items (oil pump, timing chain, etc.) along with the AFM delete. This turned into a performance cam, higher compression and a few other small mods. Not long after it was back on the road, I took the family on an 1,800+ mile trip to Tampa, averaging 19 MPG at 70 MPH, fully loaded and towing a small trailer. Coming back from Tampa, I towed a 1,000 lb. golf cart on that trailer and even more on board and averaged 17 MPG cruising at 70 MPH.

My point is that if you adhere to maintenance, take a few proactive measures and keep clean oil in it, you'll see that these are strong and reliable rigs and the internet negativity is blown out of proportion.
 

Joseph Garcia

Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
6,514
Reaction score
8,519
Buy a Chinese knockoff Tech 2 unit for about $350, and you can disable the AFM on the truck, and you will have a top notch scanning and programming tool that will pay for itself many times over, for the life of the truck.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
129,222
Posts
1,812,381
Members
92,325
Latest member
Tom McCormick
Top