5.3 vs 6.0

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Tiny04

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Posts
3
Reaction score
0
So i know the 5.3 early 2000 Tahoe's and Yukon are bulletproof, but I dont know much about the 6.0 that cam in the Yukon Denali, I've heard it uses the same block as the 5.3 but I dont know much about it. Anybody have any info on the 6.0
 

Big Mama

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Posts
3,881
Reaction score
2,499
Location
Virginia
Lots of info on here about it look in the 2000-2006 forum there are fewer of them bc of what they came in. Good motor.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,296
Reaction score
30,248
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
They do not share the same blocks. The each have different bore sizes and the 5.3s also had the option of an aluminum block. The 6.0s made anywhere from 300 to 340 horsepower depending on year and model and application.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Yup. Different blocks but essentially the same design, making them all equally reliable at their core. Sticking to the truck engines, there are different variations of each, but the iron block 5.3s are all about the same and there was a high-output version. For the 6.0, the two most commonly compared variants are the LQ4 and LQ9. The LQ9 is the higher-compression variant with more power. It also had a few upgraded internals and I believe it was built exclusively in Romulus, Michigan. There's so much more to this subject than that, but this is a start.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
The LQ4 is perfect for a blower; the higher compression of the LQ9 is better if you want to stay NA. Both are great truck motors.
 

Erickk120

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
384
Reaction score
216
I wished the 5.3 had a little more punch, makes me want to do a cam, but am at 200k so idk if its worth it. Then again our trucks are fat, and they've got a small heart aka 4l60e. I would have loved it if we would have gotten 4l80e big daddy love.
 

Mericas_Meuth

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Posts
20
Reaction score
15
I wished the 5.3 had a little more punch, makes me want to do a cam, but am at 200k so idk if its worth it. Then again our trucks are fat, and they've got a small heart aka 4l60e. I would have loved it if we would have gotten 4l80e big daddy love.
What are the best options for the tranny if you do end up with something like 350 horses?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
Your basic beefed-up 4L60 from any of the reputable performance trans builders will handle 350 all day, every day. Really, if you have a known good regular/non-performance trans shop, they can rebuild it to factory specs but with upgraded parts and you'd be good. You can't do much harm with "only" 350 HP. This is assuming you have a nice fluid cooler and a good tune to clean up the shift tables.
 

Erickk120

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
384
Reaction score
216
What are the best options for the tranny if you do end up with something like 350 horses?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
4l60e with some upgrades as dub suggested should be good enough. I meant its just sad how the 80e can handle 500hp stock with no problems for days. Its then I realize the excuse of a tranny we got.
 

SnowDrifter

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Posts
2,484
Reaction score
2,896
Location
Sasquatch Country
4l60e with some upgrades as dub suggested should be good enough. I meant its just sad how the 80e can handle 500hp stock with no problems for days. Its then I realize the excuse of a tranny we got.
I saw someone made a regear kit for the 4l80e to being it closer to the 4l60s gear ratios. Might be worth entertaining if you ever need to swap down the road and don't want a first gear as tall as everest
 

Matthew Jeschke

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Posts
2,344
Reaction score
1,747
Location
Sahuarita, Arizona
If you find one with low miles and cheap- go for it. Otherwise, a few good tweaks to your 5.3 can easily put it at LQ4 power numbers.

iamdub, what tweaks did you have in mind. Honestly, my personal opinion I like the smaller motor. Unless I had opportunity to swap with an LS :)

As to other comments. I've had several setups with 4L60E. I don't understand why everybody disses on it. I've never had any issues myself nor have my friends. I built up my Z28 Camaro (granted lighter chasis) with a stock 4L60E and it held up like a champ. My parents had multiple suburbans, never any Tranny issues to speak of. Only thing I could think of is if you trailer a lot maybe it's not up to the load and might need a little reworking or going for the 4L80E.
 

adriver

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Posts
787
Reaction score
477
iamdub, what tweaks did you have in mind. Honestly, my personal opinion I like the smaller motor. Unless I had opportunity to swap with an LS :)

As to other comments. I've had several setups with 4L60E. I don't understand why everybody disses on it. I've never had any issues myself nor have my friends. I built up my Z28 Camaro (granted lighter chasis) with a stock 4L60E and it held up like a champ. My parents had multiple suburbans, never any Tranny issues to speak of. Only thing I could think of is if you trailer a lot maybe it's not up to the load and might need a little reworking or going for the 4L80E.

8 > 6. I win.
 

iamdub

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Posts
20,821
Reaction score
45,012
Location
Li'l Weezyana
iamdub, what tweaks did you have in mind. Honestly, my personal opinion I like the smaller motor. Unless I had opportunity to swap with an LS :)

The simple but effective ("effective" as in "possibly minimal, but not counter-productive") bolt-ons: Intake tube (MIT or homemade PVC, etc.), long tube headers, free-flow muffler and a GOOD TUNE. Averaging, there's only about a 30 HP difference from a 5.3 and LQ4 (the "mild" 6.0).


As to other comments. I've had several setups with 4L60E. I don't understand why everybody disses on it. I've never had any issues myself nor have my friends. I built up my Z28 Camaro (granted lighter chasis) with a stock 4L60E and it held up like a champ. My parents had multiple suburbans, never any Tranny issues to speak of. Only thing I could think of is if you trailer a lot maybe it's not up to the load and might need a little reworking or going for the 4L80E.

It's all in what you want for your purposes. My gripe about the 4L60E is that there are only four gears and wide gaps between them. There are too many instances in my most common commutes where I'm going at just the right speed where it's too fast to downshift so it just stays in that next gear up and lugs the engine when trying to accelerate. At my current power levels, the 60-rating is sufficient so I can't bash it there. The 80 is stronger, but it also has different gearing that is more for low-end grunt than high- or top-speed driving. Still, it's only four speeds.

I would LOVE to convert mine to a 6L80E with all the factory stuff: Tapshift controls on the shift lever, appropriate gauge cluster, etc. It'd probably be easier to do a 6-speed manual conversion.
 

Matthew Jeschke

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Posts
2,344
Reaction score
1,747
Location
Sahuarita, Arizona
The simple but effective ("effective" as in "possibly minimal, but not counter-productive") bolt-ons: Intake tube (MIT or homemade PVC, etc.), long tube headers, free-flow muffler and a GOOD TUNE. Averaging, there's only about a 30 HP difference from a 5.3 and LQ4 (the "mild" 6.0).




It's all in what you want for your purposes. My gripe about the 4L60E is that there are only four gears and wide gaps between them. There are too many instances in my most common commutes where I'm going at just the right speed where it's too fast to downshift so it just stays in that next gear up and lugs the engine when trying to accelerate. At my current power levels, the 60-rating is sufficient so I can't bash it there. The 80 is stronger, but it also has different gearing that is more for low-end grunt than high- or top-speed driving. Still, it's only four speeds.

I would LOVE to convert mine to a 6L80E with all the factory stuff: Tapshift controls on the shift lever, appropriate gauge cluster, etc. It'd probably be easier to do a 6-speed manual conversion.
Ah i had the same idea about going to a 6 speed auto.. but had same thoughts. Probably near impossible to update controller and dash :/

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,765
Posts
1,991,573
Members
102,755
Latest member
Bob LaFord
Back
Top