About that funny shaped intake tube - there's a reason - Performance!

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

GreyStone

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Posts
896
Reaction score
995
Keep your stock Air Intake system guys, a lot of engineering went into that funny design.

https://itstillruns.com/air-intake-resonator-do-12156112.html

rt.jpg
 
Last edited:

mikeyss

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Posts
1,758
Reaction score
3,393
Location
Longmont, Colorado.
Interesting find, however.... I wouldn't care if I lost 20HP by ditching my ugly factory air intake. It looks bad and I prefer the engine noise... sound waves and pressure be damned, haha.
 
OP
OP
G

GreyStone

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Posts
896
Reaction score
995
Interesting find, however.... I wouldn't care if I lost 20HP by ditching my ugly factory air intake. It looks bad and I prefer the engine noise... sound waves and pressure be damned, haha.
I think the ability to control air pressure pulses has become a lot more important with the addition of variable valve timing to V8 engines.
 

Peacock

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2020
Posts
169
Reaction score
223
Location
Buffalo,NY
That article is way to generic/vague and I'd like to see an infrared, if you will, video of the soundwave bouncing off the backside of the valve, back through the intake manifold, maf, down the tube and into that chamber. Just give me a back to back dyno comparison and db level output to see real world results.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
Ok, well Blackbear Performance did dyno tests comparing CAI’s and most of them gained a few HP over the ugly stock intake tube, and some quite a few more, so exactly how good did GM engineers do on the HP side of the equation as opposed to the quiet side of it? I’m of the belief that they chose quiet over performance. You can still find the results of their latest test, on a ‘16 6.2l, on their website. They gained over 25 HP with the AFE intake.

http://blackbearperformance.com/IntakeTestResults_2016.asp
 

Peacock

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2020
Posts
169
Reaction score
223
Location
Buffalo,NY
Ok, well Blackbear Performance did dyno tests comparing CAI’s and most of them gained a few HP over the ugly stock intake tube, and some quite a few more, so exactly how good did GM engineers do on the HP side of the equation as opposed to the quiet side of it? I’m of the belief that they chose quiet over performance. You can still find the results of their latest test, on a ‘16 6.2l, on their website. They gained over 25 HP with the AFE intake.

http://blackbearperformance.com/IntakeTestResults_2016.asp

Thanks for that link, looks like that AFE is the best overall, I just asked a question about an AirRaid tube in a different thread, but this answers that question. Now to check prices for my 2013 5.3 PPV
 

Geoffsfas10

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2019
Posts
806
Reaction score
1,761
Location
St. Louis
I also found this video rather interesting about the tubes


the dyno curves are interesting
 

LDMoore

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Posts
41
Reaction score
45
Interesting analysis but I also believe it was primarily for sound dampening. As has been noted if this was true then dyno testing should show a loss in power and not gains.

My other question is when this pressure wave bounces back would it not just move toward another cylinder with an open valve instead of ALL the way back into the intake tube? I can see how you might possibly have waves bouncing around inside the manifold but as the cylinders are pulling in air sequentially and consistently the air coming into the tube should be constant and consistent.

If you're talking about a single or two cylinder engine this might make sense but in something like a V8 there's always at least 1 or 2 intake valves open at any given time for air to be drawn into.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 

avalonandl

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Posts
2,200
Reaction score
2,644
Location
Troy, MICH & Naples, FL
Our intakes were designed to give you a nice quiet cabin, fit within the space, work from -40 to 140 etc........

They will give you decent performance ....oh and they had to build 1-2 million a year....
 
OP
OP
G

GreyStone

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Posts
896
Reaction score
995
Interesting analysis but I also believe it was primarily for sound dampening. As has been noted if this was true then dyno testing should show a loss in power and not gains.

My other question is when this pressure wave bounces back would it not just move toward another cylinder with an open valve instead of ALL the way back into the intake tube? I can see how you might possibly have waves bouncing around inside the manifold but as the cylinders are pulling in air sequentially and consistently the air coming into the tube should be constant and consistent.

If you're talking about a single or two cylinder engine this might make sense but in something like a V8 there's always at least 1 or 2 intake valves open at any given time for air to be drawn into.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
I think the stock system may become particularly important when the engine drops to 4 cylinders from AFM - it might help smooth the transition.
 

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
I think the OP missed the fact that the stock system on our trucks just plain sucks. It’s ugly, huge and it underperforms. It’s been proven for the last 20 years that pretty much any CAI other than the stock one is better. Not as quiet, but better performance wise. I’ll tell you what- when you buy a supercharger ( like I did lol) one of the things they include is a CAI tube to connect to your stock air box and guess what? It doesn’t have a bunch of chambers for waves to “bounce off”. And most of us like to hear our engines at least a little. This reminds me of Harley Davidsons, especially their V-Rods. In stock form they almost sound like sewing machines and the first thing almost everybody does is either mod the stock exhaust or buy an aftermarket one.
 
OP
OP
G

GreyStone

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Posts
896
Reaction score
995
I think the OP missed the fact that the stock system on our trucks just plain sucks. It’s ugly, huge and it underperforms. It’s been proven for the last 20 years that pretty much any CAI other than the stock one is better. Not as quiet, but better performance wise. I’ll tell you what- when you buy a supercharger ( like I did lol) one of the things they include is a CAI tube to connect to your stock air box and guess what? It doesn’t have a bunch of chambers for waves to “bounce off”. And most of us like to hear our engines at least a little. This reminds me of Harley Davidsons, especially their V-Rods. In stock form they almost sound like sewing machines and the first thing almost everybody does is either mod the stock exhaust or buy an aftermarket one.
Glad to hear you have it all figured out Rocket Man - I'll try not to miss any facts in the future that don't conform to your all knowing views of the world.
 
OP
OP
G

GreyStone

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Posts
896
Reaction score
995

Rocket Man

Mark
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Posts
26,679
Reaction score
52,949
Location
Oregon
Glad to hear you have it all figured out Rocket Man - I'll try not to miss any facts in the future that don't conform to your all knowing views of the world.
Thanks, I’d appreciate that! :signs8: Realistically though, dyno numbers are real, a bunch of words about a generic product don’t prove anything. The article you based your theory on had nothing backing it up test wise, and it didn’t directly state anything about GM’s cold air intake design so if I kept even one person from leaving one of them on their vehicle because they mistakenly thought if they replaced it with something else they would suffer decreased performance then that’s good. I apologize if I offended you, I was just trying to set the record straight. The data doesn’t lie.
 

avalonandl

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Posts
2,200
Reaction score
2,644
Location
Troy, MICH & Naples, FL
That BLACKBEAR report is interesting but IGNORES sound attenuation. Unless I missed it max dB in the cabin was never measured.

Many soccer moms/dads don't want the loud roar of a CAI.....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,748
Posts
1,991,148
Members
102,737
Latest member
048tahoe
Back
Top