Forgot to say that this was while I was living in the KC, Mo. area and changed the oil right after the owner got the van home. I helped him do the rear main seal the next weekend.
Used engine flush, now rear main seal leaking.
- Thread starter Rayyy
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
nonickatall
Full Access Member
Ok on a Ford you can do this. I talked about engines and cars, not about Ford.
As I always said:
No cars with F. No Ford, no Fiat, no French cars...
Last edited:
OP
OP
Rayyy
Full Access Member
Well, good news… After a few days of dripping after each drive, the leak has completely stopped. There is no more dripping.
Something to note… I did add a can of Ceratec with the oil change, so maybe that helped?
I have also been doing a lot of highway driving this last week, so not sure if this has something to do with it, but it appears that the seal has resealed itself.
Engine runs smooth as a sewing machine though.
I’ll update if it starts leaking again.
Something to note… I did add a can of Ceratec with the oil change, so maybe that helped?
I have also been doing a lot of highway driving this last week, so not sure if this has something to do with it, but it appears that the seal has resealed itself.
Engine runs smooth as a sewing machine though.
I’ll update if it starts leaking again.
rockola1971
Full Access Member
What likely happened is the engine flush additives cause the rear main seal to shrink or expand. Which of course leaves gaps and leaks. After heat cycles and plenty of oil coming in contact with the seal lips and has reversed what was done to them. Myself I would plan on a rear main seal soon and not expect it to be good to go until then.
This is also why I dont recommend a tranny flush on a high mileage tranny.
This is also why I dont recommend a tranny flush on a high mileage tranny.
nonickatall
Full Access Member
I really appreciate your posts, but this is where you are wrong. In an automatic transmission, bad oil is the first problem for poor functions and the basis for wear.
This is because the hydrocarbon chains from which oil is formed, mechanically wear between the gears, pistons and clutches and lose their lubricity. Additional there is increasing wear of the clutches which are fine Partikels keep swimming in the oil. The fiber made filters in automatic transmissions do not filter this fine wear out.
I have had many automatic transmissions that were in older cars and shifted poorly and after an oil change they shifted like in a new car.
However, I've had a few people come to me with poorly shifting transmissions and I told them the first thing is: You can do is change the oil. And if this does not improve the switching behavior then you already have a mechanical issue.
And that just the only reason why automatic transmission die after an Oilchange, because they were already on end of lifetime.
But that seals fail, because of new oil is fantasy. How should that work?
A seal is built to be chemically compatible with the respective oil. Now the oil changes himself over time, because it's old and used up and full of suspended matter that doesn't belong there. And then the seal changes chemically and can no longer tolerate new oil?
That is probably very unlikely and why do the seals of the same design tolerate regular engine oil changes, but shouldn't tolerate an automatic transmission oil change?
That is also not plausible and does not correspond to my many years of workshop experience.
I do overhaul off automatic transmission and I fully understand how an automatic transmission is working, mostly they fail, because of wear of the clutches, wear inside of the valve housing, or failure of bearings, sometimes because of brocken gears, but never because of failed sealings, if you refill the lost oil.
I hope you don't get me wrong. Just a technical discussion between gmt800 afficinados...
Best regards in respect from Germany
NickTransmissions
Sin City
Correct...NOT changing/flushing the fluid often enough (lack of maintenance) is among the top three killers of transmissions, the other two being frequent high RPMs and heat.
I want to understand what @nonickatall and @NickTransmissions are saying. Scenario:
I was in and ran shops for 35+ years. I have seen a vehicle come in the shop for a second opinion of a recommended transmission flush for aged and dirty fluid and after a road test it was determined that the auto transmission functioned fine, shifted as it should and after talking to the owner, they said the same and was just in for an engine oil change and the previous shop had presented him with the transmission flush recommendation.
We agreed that the fluid was dirty looking, light brownish color and the owner did not know the last time the fluid and filter had been done. He trusted our shop and the recommendation was bothering him so he asked us to do the filter change and the fluid flush. We did it and within a week, the shifting norms changed and vehicle was back in the shop with even worse looking fluid than when it was originally offered to us the week before.
To be fair, I myself had cautioned the owner of the flush because I had heard, I am not an auto transmission specialist, from transmission friends in the business that doing a flush can at times be a shock to the clutches and cause later problems. This scenario was repeated at least a half dozen times in my career in shops. Each time a pre flush road test was done and each time the owner said the transmission gave them no concern except that they were warned of dirty fluid.
Are you saying that each time the transmission was actually in the middle of failing and the owner and shop tech did not know it or feel it? I just gotta know because I still do work on the side and have done a few transmission services but have not done and will not be doing any flushes here.
I was in and ran shops for 35+ years. I have seen a vehicle come in the shop for a second opinion of a recommended transmission flush for aged and dirty fluid and after a road test it was determined that the auto transmission functioned fine, shifted as it should and after talking to the owner, they said the same and was just in for an engine oil change and the previous shop had presented him with the transmission flush recommendation.
We agreed that the fluid was dirty looking, light brownish color and the owner did not know the last time the fluid and filter had been done. He trusted our shop and the recommendation was bothering him so he asked us to do the filter change and the fluid flush. We did it and within a week, the shifting norms changed and vehicle was back in the shop with even worse looking fluid than when it was originally offered to us the week before.
To be fair, I myself had cautioned the owner of the flush because I had heard, I am not an auto transmission specialist, from transmission friends in the business that doing a flush can at times be a shock to the clutches and cause later problems. This scenario was repeated at least a half dozen times in my career in shops. Each time a pre flush road test was done and each time the owner said the transmission gave them no concern except that they were warned of dirty fluid.
Are you saying that each time the transmission was actually in the middle of failing and the owner and shop tech did not know it or feel it? I just gotta know because I still do work on the side and have done a few transmission services but have not done and will not be doing any flushes here.
NickTransmissions
Sin City
Automatics are extremely vulnerable to dirty, contaminated and/or excessively aged or worn fluid. Over time, fluid breaks down and begins to lose its hydraulic and lubricative properties hence why it’s so important to change it at factory-prescribed intervals or more frequently if usage patterns are more intense.
Ultimately once the fluid breaks down enough it also loses its ability to promote clutch/steel adhesion which, combined with apply pressure driven clamping force, keeps clutch packs from slipping under load.
Lastly, fluid accumulates particulate contaminants as friction elements undergo normal wear and this contamination begins to wear valves and bores in the valve bodies, pump and anywhere else valving is located. Sealing rings and lip seals begin to harden and then begins the chain reaction to failure.
To answer your final question, in brief- yes. As long as there is just enough meat on the bone, friction-wise the clutch pack will still hold but once it goes, its done. Most of my customers describe their transmission failures as “it was working fine then suddenly i had no third gear” or something to that effect. Same with gear train components-as long as the fluid can still sufficiently lubricate, gears/shafts and other hard parts will survive. But once it cannot, they’re on short, borrowed time.
The idea that changing fluid is actually harmful to the transmission (assuming correct fluid is used) is a myth propagated throughout the industry over time, though I don’t know the exact origins.
Hope that helps but if not, let me know what i can clarify or expand upon
I need clarity on why, in all the scenarios I had laid out, the vehicles transmissions shifted and performed fine for the vehicle owner and the tech during road tests, and then right after the flush of fluid the transmission started having problems. It is hard for me to fathom that each one of these transmissions were actually "failing" for the owner and the tech but they did not experience it and that the flush had nothing to do with it.
In your explanation, the damage is already done and no one feels it. I know that owners that drive the vehicle every day can just get used to the performance of a vehicle's functions and assume all is ok when in fact it is not, but for a tech to not experience any problems during their "new to them" road tests seems like a strange outcome.
I am also not talking about dirty, "looks like motor oil" transmission fluid. I am talking about a hint of brown color on the dipstick. I don't doubt your experience and expertise at all but I do remember all the scenarios I speak of because they all had the same outcome. It sticks in a manager's memory even after all the time that has gone by.
In your explanation, the damage is already done and no one feels it. I know that owners that drive the vehicle every day can just get used to the performance of a vehicle's functions and assume all is ok when in fact it is not, but for a tech to not experience any problems during their "new to them" road tests seems like a strange outcome.
I am also not talking about dirty, "looks like motor oil" transmission fluid. I am talking about a hint of brown color on the dipstick. I don't doubt your experience and expertise at all but I do remember all the scenarios I speak of because they all had the same outcome. It sticks in a manager's memory even after all the time that has gone by.
NickTransmissions
Sin City
I can’t begin to tell you how often we cant replicate or observe a condition as described by the customer until whatever breakdown is happening “finishes” and the trans fails.
If you’re seeing a “hint” of brown on the dipstick, that fluid is already seriously bad and pan should be promptly removed to inspect for burnt clutch material, etc…Remember, heavier contaminants sink to the bottom so wont show up on the dipstick. The dipstick only inserts down to the dipstick stop, which is typically only as far as the valve body. So just looking at fluid on the dipstick by itself isnt the best way to assess fluid overall condition though if its anything but bright red and smelling like trans fluid, to me calls for further inspection. If it stinks and is dark, you’re measuring the trans’ remaining life expectancy in terms of miles or at most tens of miles for that unit.
Why Do you think the engineers and scientists at GM, Ford, Chrysler et al specify the fluid service intervals that they do, especially for pre-synthetic era transmissions?
Other side of the coin - Explain to me how a fluid flush would harm a transmission
Overall, the idea that flushes are behind transmission failures is a case of mistaking correlation for causation.
Last edited:
