Would you rather...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

yargnits

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
236
Reaction score
36
Location
Northern Indiana, the land of annoying lepreachons
We know our trucks are like tanks but I've got a question for you regarding cars. If there was a head-on crash between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air, would you rather be in the Malibu or the Bel Air?

[yt]1_ptUrQOMPs[/yt]
 

drowndindreams

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Posts
1,074
Reaction score
1
Location
Unknown
it's two sided. the bel air was made of reinforced steel at the time but i would think that the safety features are low. also the bel probably had the "rubber bullets" in front of the grille because everyone used to play chicken back then. the malibu on the other hand has a 5 star crash safety rating and countless airbags. it's either take the hit, or suffocate in 100 mph projectile airbags
 

puckhead

Full Access Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Posts
3,146
Reaction score
65
Location
CO
Repost! lol its cool though. crazy video, you think the heavy steal would win and the safety research on the new one is what saves you
 

Eagle

Thansk for all the help -STAFF!
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Posts
1,386
Reaction score
10
Location
EL PASO, TX
depends on if the 57 had C5 suspension and braking. ;) Primary safety beats secondary safety anyday.

Head-on collision I'd take the 'falls apart in 6 months' crapbox... I mean malibu. Anything else? the 57.
 

kickitandholdit

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Posts
438
Reaction score
1
Location
GA
Sorry about that. I should have posted something original like HID lighting. :D

HAHAHAHAHA! i got a cramp i laughed so hard at that! oh man made my day.

i would rather be in the bel air cause i know i would die happy driving a clean ass old bel air. who would want to be in the malabu living knowing you not only did vehicular homicide you destryoed a old bel air
 

gtbigup01

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Posts
326
Reaction score
0
Location
Columbus, GA
I think the video was rigged or the bel air wasnt made of steel. There is no way these paper cars of today will drive through steel like that. I'm not saying the malib isn't safe or anything like that, just that the materials of todays cars doesn't depict what i just watched in that video. Call me crazy
 

kickitandholdit

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Posts
438
Reaction score
1
Location
GA
I think the video was rigged or the bel air wasnt made of steel. There is no way these paper cars of today will drive through steel like that. I'm not saying the malib isn't safe or anything like that, just that the materials of todays cars doesn't depict what i just watched in that video. Call me crazy

yea people would think that because the outsides of cars now are real soft but the where the people are is solid as a rock and structurally engineered to stay together. they spend more time designing the cars to wreck than they do designing them to drive. older cars were hard but were not engineered to be strong. you can see that the bel air folded up everywhere and the malibu everything was smashed up till it got to the cab and stopped.
 
Last edited:

gtbigup01

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Posts
326
Reaction score
0
Location
Columbus, GA
yea people would think that because the outsides of cars now are real soft but the where the people are is solid as a rock and structurally engineered to stay together. they spend more time designing the cars to wreck than they do designing them to drive. older cars were hard but were not engineered to be strong. you can see that the bel air folded up everywhere and the malibu everything was smashed up till it got to the cab and stopped.

you might be right. I just dont see it. And you are correct about designing them to wreck v. drive. Lots of emphasis and engineering is focused around safety
 

General Stalin

Full Access Member
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
209
Reaction score
44
Yeah there is way too much misconception that driving an old American tin-can is safer in a crash than driving a fiberglass/plastic toy-car of today, but fact is it's just not true. Back then cars were made of just sheet metal body panels and a (usually unsupportive) frame and undercarriage. Today, like was said earlier, cars are designed with areas that are meant to cushion impact, as well as more rigid structures to withstand impact.

Cool video
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,766
Posts
1,991,615
Members
102,756
Latest member
dizhai

Latest posts

Back
Top