Three things I don't understand on current generation Suburban

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Jettix2

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Posts
74
Reaction score
66
Current suburban fascia much more appealing than Yukon in my opinion; design decisions are made by committee with a lot of analysis/consideration given to target customers' tastes and preferences.

Sales numbers indicate that both designs find large amounts of takers - enough to drop a decent chunk of change on them.

The design of the third pillar, however, I totally agree with you. Not sure if the regulation is on the width of the pillar or the strength but current design completely shafts anyone in the third row (kids in my car) with having to look out the front windows/second row to see anything beyond a large wall of plastic - unless they're willing to crane their neck to a 90 degree angle to get a couple inches of outside view. For kids with carseats, the headrests even eliminates that extreme option.

While I appreciate safety, making a design choice like this that drastically inhibits rider comfort on 90% of rides (how often passengers in third row when vehicle driven) for something that will happen 0.0001% (1 in 10k rides - still hasn't happened to me in 20+ years driving) seems egregious.

I certainly wish they'd take notes from other makers on this one.

We traded our 22 Burb out a month ago (on a ‘19 Expedition Max platinum) because the visibility in the Suburban was so terrible, especially around the front A-pillars and mirrors. I know that GM is trying to meet govt mandated crush test requirements, but the visibility out of our ‘19 Expedition (current gen) is WAY better…. Somehow Ford figured a way to make it work, I dunno.
 

EvergreenZ71

Member
Joined
May 29, 2020
Posts
96
Reaction score
61
Location
Washington
I think this whole body style just looks bad but I usually get shut down whenever I say it. The body lines are just bad, especially on the SUVs. They are far from the handsome trucks they used to be. People keep claiming it’s the regulations that make them look like they do now but the Ram, F150, and Expedition are still good looking vehicles. Some of the Asian competition suffers from the same horrendous looks but some also look good. The SWB Expedition also fits in normal people’s garages as well, so that’s nice.
I’m with you. The GMCs are the better of the batch but all of the full size GM SUVs are starting to look like vans. They’re getting taller roof lines and lower ground clearance at the same time … no wonder the weight is up and the A&C posts have to be so large.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
129,125
Posts
1,810,846
Members
92,211
Latest member
patrickleeleep
Top