what's interesting is that one doesn't see Expeditions on the road, but they are on the dealer lots. One sees tons of Tahoe/Yukon/Escalades on the roads, and until this year, not many on the lots (well in the Northeast, in Dallas there has always been 20 on the lot to our 0-2).
Same around here. When it comes to full size SUVs it's the GM ones you see. There's probably a dozen within a couple blocks of our house. Rarely see Fords and when you know a specific house or person that has one they don't have them overly long.
Consumer Reports have always been a waste of time for me. Often, what they see as flaws, I see as features. It is just a mismatch of what they think is good and/or important, and what I think is good and/or important. I will freely admit that my tastes are not mainstream, and Consumer Reports attempts to inform mainstream readers.
Consumer Reports is pretty good on their reviews but it's always funny when they have a vehicle on their avoid list yet marked as recommended in their annual auto issue at the same time! Also how two identical vehicles can have different ratings. Tahoe might say average or great ratings for something, Yukon worse then average. Same for the trucks. Sure it comes down to what people have submitted but it's always odd to see and that's been going on for years even back when there were no engine options and the only difference was the badge on the grille.