E85 issues

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mikeyss

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Posts
1,637
Reaction score
3,061
Location
Longmont, Colorado.
I've been running E85 consistently for about 8 months and I have much better throttle response and power than running on 93. I think mine feels slightly sluggish running on 93, that's why I made the switch to E85. I do a lot of city driving unfortunately, so my city mpg are about 11.5 mpg. It's about the same running either E85 or 93. Now on the highway, 93 does much better mpg wise.
 
OP
OP
Mickey_7106

Mickey_7106

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Posts
477
Reaction score
310
Location
Bay Area
i don't record it but i take a quick glance at every fill up. e85 is around mid 200's and pump is high 300s per tank. different stations for both types of fuels, always on RWD unless weather and road conditions are terrible


Mickey, have you been recording the mileage between tank fills? Were you using the same station? 4x4 or RWD?
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
6,433
Reaction score
12,685
Location
St. Louis
Also remember, Not all E85 is created equal!

I usually run E85 from Mobil or Phillips 66, as they're the closest stations to me with it, and it runs good. I was out in St. Charles over the weekend and filled up with E85 at a MotoMart. Their E85 was $2.15/gal while the Mobil up the street was $2.42 (premium is currently $3.16). The MotoMart E85 doesn't feel as peppy/powerful as when I run the Mobil or Phillips 66.

2001 Yukon SLT
2012 Yukon Denali XL
2011 Yukon Denali RIP 5/20/18
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,224
Reaction score
25,372
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
if my cats were going out won't there be a code thrown?

Eventually. But mileage may decrease until the codes are thrown, happened to me. You can watch this happen with a scan tool like the Tech-2, not sure about the Torque Pro but @kbuskill knows.

However, the range you're describing is what I get usually:
upload_2019-7-18_19-29-43.png

11.4 MPG by 26 gallons is just shy of 300 miles for E85.


Ohh, let me ask you something since we basically have the same year and model truck, if you fill up right after the light comes on, how much does she usually take? Mine's about 25 gallons give or take 1.
 
OP
OP
Mickey_7106

Mickey_7106

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Posts
477
Reaction score
310
Location
Bay Area
The e85 in Berkeley is from propel fuels. No idea how that compares to others

I don't think I've ran in down till the light comes on. I vaguely remember pumping 29 gallons one time. Going on a trip this weekend, I'll try to get it low to see
 

HACK BLOCK

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Posts
538
Reaction score
179
Location
NYC
I truck runs smoother on e85 but I do feel less performance than 93
 

machadosl

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Posts
10
Reaction score
9
Location
Brazil, Rio de Janeiro
Here in Brazil we don't have the E85 but a mixture of 73% of gasoline and 27% of ethanol, or I can use the mixture of 95% of ethanol with 5% of gasoline. Using any of then I do not see any difference on its performance only in fuel consumption, that is greater using ethanol. 7 mpg with ethanol and 11.7 using gasoline.
Another point is, if I only use ethanol, on the second time I fill the tank the check engine light comes on.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
6,433
Reaction score
12,685
Location
St. Louis
To get more performance/hp when running E85, the programming/tune when running that fuel needs to have higher spark and fuel tables.

Usually the factory programming detects the alcohol content and changes it's programming accordingly.

Many tuning devices or tuners will change/optimize the fuel and spark tables to get the most power out of 87, 91, 93 octane fuel, but don't touch the factory E85 tables. I know DiabloSport doesn't change the factory E85 tuning, and I'm sure there are others.

So basically, if your vehicles factory tuning doesn't take advantage of E85's high octane and run higher spark tables when running it, then you won't feel any performance increase.

I believe GM states that the 5.3l when run on E85 produces 326hp vs the 315hp on 87 octane.

2001 Yukon SLT
2012 Yukon Denali XL
2011 Yukon Denali RIP 5/20/18
 

Forum statistics

Threads
129,586
Posts
1,818,384
Members
92,839
Latest member
Justsmurph
Top