Great topic. It is amazing to me that we even have to discuss this. New engine, period. Being the proud owner of a 2023 GMC Yukon Denali XL with 28,000 miles, and just having waved goodby to a 2011 GMC Yukon Denali XL with 203,000 miles, I have mixed feelings. Should I have sold the 2011 to buy the 2023? The 2023 was bought as a road car. Air suspension and all. The 2011 was a partial road car until I retired and put it road tripping two or three weeks at a time.
We sold the 2011 because I did not want to be stuck in Cut Bank, MT with a major repair. Engine used zero oil. Transmission shifted as new. AWD was perfect. Never had any problems, nothing leaked, but I knew that things should be expected at that age. It was time for things to start breaking.
So, what to do? Stuck in Cut Bank MT with a major repair is a serious problem, starting with finding a GM dealer. Replacing an engine, once I had it towed to the found GMC dealer somewhere, is a major inconvenience. In other words, I will be waiting 2 weeks or more for the replacement of a motor.
From what I read the 2023 problem is likely universal. Some will surface early. Some late. Maybe some never. But I think there is a definite risk that it is universal.
I think I go to the dealer, find the deal on the new one, then see what happens. Since I retired money is not that important only because I am spending nowhere near what I was when working, but I will be losing my ass on the Yukon regardless. So if I feel the deal is fair, then I will pull the trigger for a 2025. Since it is her car, the wife is now thinking about it.
What else would I buy anyway? My Suburbans and Yukons have all been fabulous high mileage vehicles. Plus they ride and handle very well, and are damn comfortable on long trips. I will not buy an underpowered turbo charged V6 anyway, and the Wagoneers cannot get away from a repair shop.
Probably only get $1,500 on the inevitible class action if we are lucky, because the lawyers will need to be paid.
I love that the solution is thicker oil. Why do they maintain the 0 on the 0/40. I would think the thicker bottom number is more important than the upper number.
Does anyone know if the check engine light should be illuminated on that code?
One other option is to find a reputable engine builder. I foresee enough in loss that an aftermarket solution could make sense. It is a bottom end only rebuild. Plus you get rid of the V4/V8 "feature", which will only cost you $250. That is about all one will save in gas over the life of the Yukon anyway. What do you think about this option?