Cammed 5.3l

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

mtbennett24

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
117
Reaction score
0
Anyone have a cammed 5.3l nnbs? Wondering if a cam mod is worth the $$$ and effort for a daily driver that does some boat towing too. Thanks!
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
All depends on the cam you go with. Also, you might want to match it up with a stall, then you are opening a whole new can of worms!
 
OP
OP
M

mtbennett24

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
117
Reaction score
0
Hey Jenna, I found this on the GMFS forum. Are they talking about your Tahoe? Are these cams that might not require a stall and could still give low end power? They are referencing an '04 Z71 with 5.3l.

Biggest I'd go in your truck without a stall is a 212/218 on a 112 or 114LSA. However, since you're in a heavier truck, it may not provide the bottom end grunt that you want. In that case, I'd run a grind like JustinSS recently installed in his lady's tahoe. Something along the lines of 206-208 intake duration and 212-216 exhaust duration. I wouldn't worry about running an extremely high lift. Also, as far as lobe separation angle, 114LSA would provide you with a broader powerband and it would have somewhat of a lope at idle. 112LSA will have a more defined powerband and the idle will be a bit more lopier. That aspect is left up to you.
Suggestions without upgrading converters:

the COMP Cams 54-408-11. Its a 206/212 .515"/.522" on a 112LSA

If you think you may ever upgrade converters, I'd go with the COMP Cams 54-412-11.
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
Yes, that would be mine. I didn't want to install a stall and I knew we would be running a blower. Was perfect with and withough F/I.
 
OP
OP
M

mtbennett24

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
117
Reaction score
0
Pardon the ignorance, but why wouldn't you want a stall with F/I?
 
OP
OP
M

mtbennett24

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
117
Reaction score
0
Got it. And the mild cam still gave noticeable results even without F/I? Thank you.
 

SmallXL

Full Access Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Posts
104
Reaction score
1
Anyone have a cammed 5.3l nnbs? Wondering if a cam mod is worth the $$$ and effort for a daily driver that does some boat towing too. Thanks!

a cam will typical move your torque curve. Taking some out of the bottom to put it on top (horsepower). Moving your curve up the RPM range isn't going to help towing. FI with a cam work work - $$$.
 

Logan S Bull

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 18, 2018
Posts
3
Reaction score
16
a cam will typical move your torque curve. Taking some out of the bottom to put it on top (horsepower). Moving your curve up the RPM range isn't going to help towing. FI with a cam work work - $$$.
I did a low lift truck cam 208 212 550 550 and a full rebuild of my lmg . For towing no sir it would really hurt it I think. However in the foot and seat power throughout the curve is more low end did loose some umpth over stock. Stak would help. Dyno read 330 at the wheels after 8k in parts. N/A IS NOT THE WAY. LOL
 

blackelky

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Posts
586
Reaction score
770
Whats your gearing? That might make a bigger difference than a cam depending ok your ratio
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,723
Posts
1,990,429
Members
102,714
Latest member
briannorris

Latest posts

Back
Top