fast intake..

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0
i bought fast intake manifold that im looking to put on my 2006 tahoe 5.3
i have afe cai
i went with the 102 throttle body

my question is
how can i fit the intake tube on the 102 throttle body
this thing is huge!

i didnt receive the intake yet.. im just thinking!
thanks guys
 

Splatmaster527

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Posts
240
Reaction score
0
Location
Cleveland, OH
Well since you probably spent well over $1K on the intake and TB I would suggest you take the time and switch to a 102mm MAF and do a 4in intake tube... No sense in making a 102mm Throttle Body suck trough a significantly smaller MAF and Intake tube.
Not to mention the FAST Intake pushes the TB forward so the old CAI probably wont even line up without some awkward angling in the joints.

Something like this would be helpful. And you would need some 4in Intake Tube to fab it up.
 

ATL

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Posts
491
Reaction score
1
im no pro with a 5.3 but im thinking a fast intake is alittle extreme for a 5.3 suv. it flows so much you will prob lose significant bottom end power. also the fast/ls1 car intakes are shorter than the truck intakes. the truck intakes are taller for the exact reason of inlet tube/radiator shroud clearance. i think with one of those intakes, your best bet is to swap to electric fans, that will open up a good amount of room in that area.

for $1k+, there is much better suited upgrades for the vehicle
 
OP
OP
O

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0

Splatmaster527

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Posts
240
Reaction score
0
Location
Cleveland, OH
Not trying to be an ass but spending $1K on an intake with a 102mm Throttle Body and then putting it on a tiny MAF and Filter is pretty stupid...

The stock MAF is 75mm (4417 square mm of area)
The 102mm TB is 8171 square mm of area
You are reducing the air flow area by 46%...

As for a cam... Comp Cams Thumpr would probably get you the most power without a new converter.
 

ATL

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Posts
491
Reaction score
1
i bought fast intake manifold that im looking to put on my 2006 tahoe 5.3

it is my daily ride.. so i want hp without losing torque

thats like saying you just stocked up on twinkies, and you want to know what the best ice cream is without changing your pants size bc you want to get in shape.

the intake and cam will VERY effectively do the exact opposite of what you are tryin to do. but, in all honesty, itd prob run like a scalded dog if you purchased the 1 thing you said you didnt want to; a converter.

im not tryin to bust your balls, but you are going about your goals the hardest way possible. what exactly are your goals with the vehicle? street driven only? goes in the mud? you tryin to drag race it? let us know the exact goals, and youll probably get a few solid ideas from different members here
 

Tahoewhat

Ballin' on a Budget
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Posts
3,720
Reaction score
25
Location
TX
thats like saying you just stocked up on twinkies, and you want to know what the best ice cream is without changing your pants size bc you want to get in shape.

LMAO... ha ha

oh,, FTW
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
I agree with what folks are saying, you don't have the proper supporting mods for the intake swap. That being said, you could have just gone with a cam and TC and probably gotten more bang for the buck.

The only way I would remove a stock manifold would be for a supercharger.
 
OP
OP
O

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0
as for the cam.. im still planning and thinking about the options
what do u think of comp 212-218?

as for the intake.. do u think 102 throttle is too much? should i go with smaller one?
i just dont like the idea of changing stock MAF
i read stories where aftermarket MAFs caused problems

my goal here is to build a fast street daily driver.. i go off-roading occasionally

thank you again

---------- Post added at 07:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 AM ----------

btw.. i already done lt headers, exhaust, CAI, tune, servo.. etc
 

JennaBear

Resident Ninja
Joined
May 3, 2009
Posts
6,086
Reaction score
241
Location
San Diego, CA
I say, go with a cam, TC and gears- return the intake, just asking for trouble with it.

If you want to put a power plant on there, go f/i.
 

ATL

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Posts
491
Reaction score
1
I say, go with a cam, TC and gears- return the intake, just asking for trouble with it.

If you want to put a power plant on there, go f/i.

i agree with the statment above, and best part, if you can return the intake, that alone should pay for the 3 things mentioned here
 
OP
OP
O

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0
thank you alla
i will think about returning the intake

so what other parts should i go with?
comp 212-218 what do u think about this cam?
what TC should i go with?

i have 4wheel.. i guess i cant install gears right?
 

ezdaar

Chat Troll
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Posts
3,715
Reaction score
127
Location
Redneck central, Aka Houston
the 212-218 low lift is a proven winner for tow and 4x4 app's
You toss in some comp or crane 1.8 rockers and you will see a VERY NICE performance upgrade.

top 3 street DD converters, in no particular order.

Circle D, their 285mm, 2800 or the 3000-3200k for 385$ is VERY hard to beat.
FTI converters
Yank 2800, 3000

you want to get into real high end look into neil chance converters.
 
OP
OP
O

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0
thanks man.. appreciate the help

do i need to change springs with this cam?
what springs should i go with? comp? LS6?
do you think this cam is my best option?
any thing else i need to change?

thanks again
 

ezdaar

Chat Troll
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Posts
3,715
Reaction score
127
Location
Redneck central, Aka Houston
his springs will work with it but they are also on the verge of not being able to control the valves..

Pac is the go to springs atm, stay away from comp 918's WAY to many ppl have had springs break to even consider them.

Bud cam selection is like a muffler, its personal preference and based on what converter you choose.

With the Circle D 285 2800 its a perfect match, you could get alil more topend power by going to the 212-218 highlift or go with the 218-220 for more power everywhere, but sacraficeing a tiny bit of lowend..

by lowend I mean below 2300ish rpm.. BUT the convertor will make up for it, by allowing you to get into the power of the cam faster..

I advise, calling one of the above mentioned shops and talking to them in length.
Tellem what you want to do, what you expect and what price range you have to work with. Tellem your a noob (no insult intended) and you need advise on the complete build.

These are gearheads, bud, they LOVE to talk cars.. so be ready to take notes and listen, listen and listen more.
your going to learn alot in a very short time.
Take the opp to read over at LS1 truck and performancetrucks. they get this exact question " i need more" 20 times a day...
 

Splatmaster527

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Posts
240
Reaction score
0
Location
Cleveland, OH
As noted above your best bet is just to give Comp a call. Tell them what you are looking for and they will walk you through everything. Since you were already looking at over $1500 with the stuff you were talking about before you should be able to get a pretty sick cam and valvetrain setup with a TC for well below that number.
 
OP
OP
O

Omar

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Posts
49
Reaction score
0
thanks for the info

what do u think about this cam
comp #54-414-11 216 220 .525 .532 114?
or should i stick to 212 218?
i will buying ls6 springs.. is it ok?
what pushrods should i go with?
are the 1.8 rockers necessary? and which ones should i buy?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,705
Posts
1,990,113
Members
102,699
Latest member
moto
Back
Top