Lowering Rear Spring options?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

WillRyan

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
From the searching that I have done, I've come across 3 options to lower the rear end of my moms suburban to level it with the front.

1.) The McGaughy's 2" Drop springs
http://www.mcgaughystore.com/chevrolet-suburban-ld-shocks-2007-2014-rear-2-leveling-kit-mcgaughys-30014/


2.) The Rear springs off of a PPV tahoe.
GM Part #15200994

3.) Eibach Lowering Springs
Part #: 38132.520


I like the idea of the PPV springs, because its an option from GM. I know they are Pedders Springs, and Pedders has alway received rave reviews. I have read that the PPV Tahoes are lower by about 1" from factory suspension. But anytime I see a PPV on the street, it seems like the rear is squatting. The McGaughy kit lowers the rear 2", and includes shock extensions. Eibach claims to lower the rear only 1-1.5".

Which one is true to their manufacture claims?


What are most of you guys running?
 

NeverSatisfied

eBay Baller
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Posts
2,643
Reaction score
1,308
Location
Wichita, Kansas
^^^ or mcgaughys. Have personally never really heard to many good thing about eibach. Nothing major just most of the time I hear their alright but should've went with someone else
 
OP
OP
W

WillRyan

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
Just took some measurements before I order the McGauphy kit.

Stock Height
Front: 32.625"
Rear: 34.5"

That's a 1.875 difference.

Common sense tells me the 2" McGaughy kit will squat.

---------- Post added at 03:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:38 PM ----------

That is measured from the bottom of the wheel lip.
 
Last edited:

YuCanada

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Posts
1,431
Reaction score
495
Location
Nunavut, Canada
I'm actually installing the mcgaughy coils this week.

My current measurements are 35 1/8 front and 38 1/8 rear from fender to ground.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

YuCanada

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Posts
1,431
Reaction score
495
Location
Nunavut, Canada
New measurements are 35 1/8 front and 36 1/8 rear. Pretty much exactly two inches lol.

a5549a0833fd2c72296f54708b17fb63.jpg

4742225aaae310da101930945c0d0f4c.jpg

c1c5f0783d9e8d038917363cb541bc30.jpg

b60b24386c60f0821deaf6d2e73640bc.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ivin74

05 NBS Nali
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Posts
2,420
Reaction score
2,557
Location
Htown, Texas
Go with the PPV GM springs they have the best ride. The Belltech springs ride like a lowrider(too bumpy for my taste) and the McGraughys ride a little on the to hard side.
 
Last edited:

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
From the searching that I have done, I've come across 3 options to lower the rear end of my moms suburban to level it with the front.

1.) The McGaughy's 2" Drop springs
http://www.mcgaughystore.com/chevrolet-suburban-ld-shocks-2007-2014-rear-2-leveling-kit-mcgaughys-30014/


2.) The Rear springs off of a PPV tahoe.
GM Part #15200994

3.) Eibach Lowering Springs
Part #: 38132.520


I like the idea of the PPV springs, because its an option from GM. I know they are Pedders Springs, and Pedders has alway received rave reviews. I have read that the PPV Tahoes are lower by about 1" from factory suspension. But anytime I see a PPV on the street, it seems like the rear is squatting. The McGaughy kit lowers the rear 2", and includes shock extensions. Eibach claims to lower the rear only 1-1.5".

Which one is true to their manufacture claims?


What are most of you guys running?



i use the suburban belltech springs. $215 shipped on customers trucks and i never hear any negative feedback. if you want more info shoot me a pm or hollar at me on text/phone

tony
 
OP
OP
W

WillRyan

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
Thanks for all of the responses guys!

Decided on the PPV springs, really like the idea that its a GM product!

Should be here by next Tuesday and then will update when ever they get installed!
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Posts
8
Reaction score
0
Hi WillRyan ,
please can you let me know if the PPV GM Part #15200994 rear springs are
around 2" shorter comparing to stock civilian Tahoe rear springs ?

Thank you :)
 
OP
OP
W

WillRyan

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
Stock Height
Front: 32.625"
Rear: 34.5"

New Height
Rear: 32.75"

The PPV Springs lowered the rear end by 1.75" on my moms suburban! I must say, it sits just about perfect now!!

IMG_8939_zps9lkihyfj.jpg

IMG_8937_zpsv0phepas.jpg

IMG_8938_zpskisi0l9m.jpg


---------- Post added at 07:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 AM ----------

Hi WillRyan ,
please can you let me know if the PPV GM Part #15200994 rear springs are
around 2" shorter comparing to stock civilian Tahoe rear springs ?

Thank you :)

Pictures are above! The PPV springs lowered the rear end by 1.75". There is still the slightest rake to the stance. However your eyes will play tricks depending on the location and make it seem like the rear is squatting.

Ride quality seems to have stayed the same, and my mom has not complained so I think its good in that department.
 

ivin74

05 NBS Nali
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Posts
2,420
Reaction score
2,557
Location
Htown, Texas
Ride quality seems to have stayed the same, and my mom has not complained so I think its good in that department.[/QUOTE]


I'm glad you liked it.
 

NORCAL SS

SUV SUSPENSION GURU
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Posts
8,744
Reaction score
610
Stock Height
Front: 32.625"
Rear: 34.5"

New Height
Rear: 32.75"

The PPV Springs lowered the rear end by 1.75" on my moms suburban! I must say, it sits just about perfect now!!

IMG_8939_zps9lkihyfj.jpg

IMG_8937_zpsv0phepas.jpg

IMG_8938_zpskisi0l9m.jpg


---------- Post added at 07:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 AM ----------



Pictures are above! The PPV springs lowered the rear end by 1.75". There is still the slightest rake to the stance. However your eyes will play tricks depending on the location and make it seem like the rear is squatting.

Ride quality seems to have stayed the same, and my mom has not complained so I think its good in that department.


theres no way thats 32.75. looks like 35.75
 

Norvell57

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Posts
32
Reaction score
0
Location
Cookeville TN
I priced some PPV coils yesterday through my work with my discount. Still not sure if those being a 1.75 drop or for $$30 more i can get some true 2" drop coils would look better with 22s
 
OP
OP
W

WillRyan

TYF Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
theres no way thats 32.75. looks like 35.75

Measurement was taken from bottom of wheel lip to fender lip. That is why the reading seems short.

Measuring from ground to bottom of fender lip.

Front : 36.375"

Rear : 36.4375"

Rear sits 1/16" taller than the front.

---------- Post added at 07:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 AM ----------

I priced some PPV coils yesterday through my work with my discount. Still not sure if those being a 1.75 drop or for $$30 more i can get some true 2" drop coils would look better with 22s

Well seeing that these dropped the rear 1.75" and now the rear only sits 1/16" taller than the front. Its up to you if you wanna take the chance of 2" coils making it squat. All depends on how yours is sitting stock. The difference in stock height for me was less than 2" and did not want it to squat.

---------- Post added at 07:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:31 AM ----------

@WillRyan

This is mine sitting at 33.75 in the front.

Like 35 in the back

one2_zpsoimowmuh.jpg

Looks good, love those newer wheels.
 
Last edited:

Goodinblack

I Like Tacos
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Posts
22,295
Reaction score
3,046
Location
Dirty South
You dropping the front?

When I had mine rear only with 2 inch springs it looked sagging. I dropped the front and it looks perfect imo
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,705
Posts
1,990,084
Members
102,699
Latest member
moto
Back
Top