BREAKING: GM is officially recalling the L87

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

BADRIDES

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2015
Posts
1,825
Reaction score
1,278
#445 and again in #483
(Dealers will inspect and, as necessary, repair or replace the engine.Vehicles that pass inspection will be provided a higher viscosity oil.)
Dealerships are NOT gonna tear engines down looking for damage. You are gonna have to come into the shop with a knocking noise before you get torn down or have a code. Dealerships dont have the man power to be tearing engines down looking for damage. If your engine sounds just fine that you are getting a 0-40 oil change.
 

viven44

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Posts
397
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas, TX
There was discussion of "debris" in the crank oil passages and on the connection rods. The crank was also I believe the words were "machined out of tolerance"??? The crank is supposed to have a micro polishing of the journals before installation, this is not usually performed at foundry, but at the assembly plant shortly before the crank is installed.

I believe the bearings were scored with debris and may have started to delaminate and/or there were problems maintaining the hydrodynamic oil wedge due to surface finish and excessive clearance.
I think I'm aligned

I'm not buying this whole manufacturing defect "spin" yet.. call me a conspiracy theorist.. for those familiar with statistical process control / 6-sigma you can probably relate. Sure, it is a manufacturing defect, assuming the process wasn't centered to begin with.. we are talking a very high failure rate on this engine on 0W-20 from day 1 (2021).

Lets assume a crank journal and bearing process targets and tolerance is setup a certain way... and there is process tolerance for both manufacturing steps, and lets say the combined "output" tolerance is setup to accept 0W-20 or 0W-40, but in this hypothetical scenario the clearances are such that 0W-40 oil would put the manufacturing output "centered" and normally distributed with 6-sigma defectivity capability (<=3.4 defective parts per million failure rate).

It's my conjecture that what we have here is a shifted manufacturing process with 0W-20 usage where the clearances are on the high side for the oil, and thus in vehicles where the clearance was outside the capability of 0W-20, it resulted in failure. We have 3-5% failure rate here (area under the curve shown in red below).

GM can say "we didn't center the manufacturing process to begin with" or say "manufacturing defects". It's all perspective. You decide.


Defects.png
 
Last edited:

Bkihum

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2023
Posts
80
Reaction score
40
Location
Champion Ohio
I do not think the bearings were too tight. I think it may have been a combination of things.

Understand that every engine built is "Cold Tested" on a device like a Spintron. If the engine was too tight at assembly the Spintron device should have detected higher current consumption of the electric motor spinning the engine.

If the motor was too loose, this may not have been picked up on the Spintron device.

I think if the engine was too loose, the oil pressure should have been an indicator, HOWEVER, the variable displacement pump may have masked a need for more oil and the pressure was not registering as low.

There was discussion of "debris" in the crank oil passages and on the connection rods. The crank was also I believe the words were "machined out of tolerance"??? The crank is supposed to have a micro polishing of the journals before installation, this is not usually performed at foundry, but at the assembly plant shortly before the crank is installed.

I believe the bearings were scored with debris and may have started to delaminate and/or there were problems maintaining the hydrodynamic oil wedge due to surface finish and excessive clearance.

Again, I believe the variable displacement oil pump may have masked a excessive clearance issue.

I have yet to see a 6.2l failure where anyone was ever alerted of an oil pressure problem. Few, if any engines had a noticeable knock or noise.
I believe every engine failed at highway speed.

At highway speed the 6.2l is under extreme engine loading at low RPM. Typically 1500-1700 RPM and when taking a very gradual rise in the road, maybe 50-100 feet over a mile or so, the engine loading will increase to between 70-100% depending on the grade and gear. Even if the transmission downshifts from 10th to 9th gear, this is only about 100 RPM increase.

I firmly believe the 0W20 oil cushion and ability to provide a thick enough layer on the crank and rod bearings was just beyond what ever damage may have occurred to the bearings or increased clearance.

Clearly there is some validity to this just because GM has proposed changing from 0W20 to 0W40 in engines that they believe had this manufacturing flaw. Some may characterize the flaw as a "defect" but I believe this is actually a combination of "Process Problems".

The Process of correctly grinding, polishing and cleaning the crank was not performed correctly.

The Process of making sure the connecting rods were clean and free of debris was not performed.

The Process of QA to verify that the engine oil clearances by way of monitoring the oil pressure was not reliable or even possibly covered up where a constant displacement oil pump may have indicated problems.

The Process of QA to pull every 100-250th engine for tear down and inspection was not performed. GM relied too much on automated assembly and testing and it is possible even the staff working in the assembly plants were not trained to identify problems or told they are to only perform X tasks and that the testing would identify any out of spec/bound conditions.

So sad all the way around. This was avoidable. Unfortunately now the end customers of 3 model years of multiple vehicles are caught in the middle of this. 600,000k or so engines in question?? What is the right answer???

All I can say is I am on the customers side and I think GM so poorly addressed this issue that they should make a public apology an get their clearly explain what they are planning to do to address this issue and how long they think it may take.

I expect this to take 18-24 months if they have to build and replace a large number of engines.

But the remedy is VERY unclear at this moment and there appear to be differences in the remedies. Maybe there was a false start, maybe Management has come to their senses?

We shall see.
I think your idea of the unfortunate outcome of this mess is very close to reality.
I worked for 42 years in an automotive assembly plant in different departments all over the plant. Your words bring back memories of things that happen from either laziness or the pressure of “ make production goal”.
Its always the customer that pays the price.
I had three 6. 2 engines failed and it was a terrible experience.
 

Mma-007

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Posts
23
Reaction score
15
I think I'm aligned

I'm not buying this whole manufacturing defect "spin" yet.. call me a conspiracy theorist.. for those familiar with statistical process control / 6-sigma you can probably relate. Sure, it is a manufacturing defect, assuming the process wasn't centered to begin with.. we are talking a very high failure rate on this engine on 0W-20 from day 1 (2021).

Lets assume a crank journal and bearing process targets and tolerance is setup a certain way... and there is process tolerance for both manufacturing steps, and lets say the combined "output" tolerance is setup to accept 0W-20 or 0W-40, but in this hypothetical scenario the clearances are such that 0W-40 oil would put the manufacturing output "centered" and normally distributed with 6-sigma defectivity capability (<=3.4 defective parts per million failure rate).

It's my conjecture that what we have here is a shifted manufacturing process with 0W-20 usage where the clearances are on the high side for the oil, and thus in vehicles where the clearance was outside the capability of 0W-20, it resulted in failure. We have 3-5% failure rate here (area under the curve shown in red below).

GM can say "we didn't center the manufacturing process to begin with" or say "manufacturing defects". It's all perspective. You decide.


View attachment 456469
This might answer your doubts. The dude is a board certified oil specialist and talks about how he helped gm in a study with showing proof of said study.

 

Stbentoak

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Posts
2,241
Reaction score
2,693
I think your idea of the unfortunate outcome of this mess is very close to reality.
I worked for 42 years in an automotive assembly plant in different departments all over the plant. Your words bring back memories of things that happen from either laziness or the pressure of “ make production goal”.
Its always the customer that pays the price.
I had three 6. 2 engines failed and it was a terrible experience.
To sum that up they put production and assembly line speed over quality control. There are multitude of factors that come into play here. Material compositions, tolerances in or out, surface finish of parts, contamination, oil itself and its pressure, oil flow, Fatigue, and I'm sure there are many other things.
I worked for 36 years making aircraft engine hot zone parts for military and commercial engines... Critical parts...If Pratt Whitney, GE, or Rolls Royce worked like this, planes would be falling out of the sky daily. Thank God they have the foresight, controls (and controls of vendors...) and traceability in place and testing to make sure this doesn't happen.....
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,753
Reaction score
2,615
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
(Dealers will inspect and, as necessary, repair or replace the engine.Vehicles that pass inspection will be provided a higher viscosity oil.)
Dealerships are NOT gonna tear engines down looking for damage. You are gonna have to come into the shop with a knocking noise before you get torn down or have a code. Dealerships dont have the man power to be tearing engines down looking for damage. If your engine sounds just fine that you are getting a 0-40 oil change.
I tend to agree w/ you, but the information about the exact inspection procedure for customer cars on the road has not been released.
The 000 and 001 Recalls/TSB both say they only apply to vehicles in dealer inventory -- even though if I look up my VIN on GMC's recall site, it says my vehicle has the 000 recall/TSB. So, this is the most confusig part, unless newer versions of the 000, 001, and 002 Recall/TSB's exist, but have not yet been published where the general public can get to it.
 
Last edited:

fredtufts

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jul 5, 2024
Posts
6
Reaction score
1
I do not have good data on the 0W20 on my 6.2l, it was drained at 544 miles!

But with the variable displacement oil pump, I think the oil pressure was probably around 25-30 PSI. The guys with the 2025's can display the oil pressure in a digital numeric form unlike the 2024 and earlier unless some of the pickups had a different dash display.

I have never heard of a 6.2l failure ever that someone was informed of an oil pressure problem before the engine seized. I do not think oil pressure is the problem, I think maybe loose bearing clearances, 0W20 oil that was too thin, not enough oil cushion and/or hydrodynamic oil wedge and way too high of a Low RPM/High Torque load at highway speeds between 60-75 MPH. Engine loading with headwinds and/or very slight grade increase (50-100 feet over 0.5-1.0 miles) will cause the engine loading to spike to 70-100% easily and may sustain for a while depending on conditions.
Good analysis, James. But if the thinner 0w20 oil contributed to the problems, it is maddening that GM continues to suggest 0w20 oil on replacement engines build after the alleged defect dates. You would think they would recommend 0w40 or 5w30.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
1,207
Reaction score
1,065
@Bkihum

3 - 6.2l failures!! 1 is bad enough. I can't imagine 3, not good at all.

What version L86 or L87?

What mileage did the failures happen?

What failed in each? Bearings, Valvetrain, Both.

Again, 1 failure is bad enough, I know about a few instances where the replacement engine failed before the vehicle was returned to the customer or within hundreds of miles.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
1,207
Reaction score
1,065
@fredtufts

0W20 is adequate and clearly works in most cases. But again 0W20 was developed for better fuel efficiency not necessarily better engine protection. Not many things that offer better fuel economy tend to be durable and long living or help with the overall reliability of the engine or now the automatic transmission with Ultra Low Viscosity automatic transmission fluids.

Part of the problem is the auto manufacturers cannot just change things that the engines/vehicles were certified with by the EPA or even when it comes to safety. In a way I am surprised the EPA allows Remote Starting if they are so worried about fuel economy and emissions!

So based on some SAE research it appears that 0W20 was developed mainly for increases in fuel economy but to try and keep the same basic protection of 5W30. So 5W30 does not have much of a jump in HTHS (High Temp/High Sheer) when compared to 0W20. There is a difference, it is just not much. If you want a jump in HTHS, the next step is 0W40. I have not compared to 10W30, but the problem is so much of today's engines are now "hydraulically" controlled for valvetrain timing and behavior, I feel that the 0 weights are less likely to cause any unusual behavior with the valvetrain control.

As I have stated many times, after running a bunch of data logging on my 2024 6.2l Yukon Denali XL, I found it concerning how often and for how long the engine loading at lower RPM's pushed the engine loads into the 70-100% range while cruising on the highway. 0W20 was able to handle it, but probably in more ideal conditions. Once fuel contaminates any oil, it viscosity and cushioning ability decreases. As an owner/driver, you cannot really tell if and how badly the oil may be fuel contaminated. Fuel contamination of the engine oil is a fact of life more so with Direct Injection engines. It can happen with port injection and turbo engines as well.

Bearing loading and oiling tends to be challenged either with extremely high RPM's or under high engine loading, especially at lower RPM where you are close to lugging the engine. Towing is also an extreme sport, while I have not experimented with the Tow Mode on my truck, I have to assume the TCM (Transmission Control Module) behavior is changed to delay shifting until higher RPM's and to not put the engine under constant heavy loads at lower RPM's. I know from towing with my 2005 6.0l Yukon even an empty enclosed trailer how much the air resistance will load the vehicle. Getting around 10 MPH when towing with anything is not unusual.

I just think the 6.2l with the TCM programming trying to squeeze 21-22 MPG out of 6000 brick is pushing the limits on the oil if it is not 100% fresh. I also think that the 0W20 is more likely to be consumed much quicker than 0W40 and once oil consumption as started, the oil supply is lower, so less cooling, less tolerable to fuel contamination, faster to break down because of just level volume. As a good friend of mine from the EPA used to say all the time, "The solution to pollution is dilution". So you need more oil to dilute the fuel in the sump, less oil in the sump the fuel dilution has a greater impact.

There are cases of small turbo charged Honda engines diluting the oil with so much fuel that there are 1-2 more quarts of oil/fuel mix in the crankcase. Why do these engines not fail at the rate of the 6.2l? I believe it is because the vehicles are much lighter and the engines are not put under extreme Low RPM/High Load conditions under normal driving conditions. Sure the turbo gets hot and needs to be oiled, but at the end of the day, driving a lighter Honda around town and on the highway without putting your foot hard into the throttle probably keeps the engine loading under 50% most of the time.

Totally different animals and operating conditions. We are driving small school buses that the engine rarely operates above 1700 RPM unless accelerating or passing. The higher 3000-4000 RPM's are actually easier on the engine bearings, especially with the 2 stage oil pump where the engine oil pressure jumps to around 70-80 PSI somewhere around 3000-3500 RPM.

I am just not comfortable with anything other that 0W40 in my engine, GM has come out and pretty much indicated there is not a problem running this oil in these engines based on what the Camero and Corvette uses as well as what he NHTSA Recall 25V274 states. I was aware before the Recall was announced that 0W40 would cause no negative effects to pretty much any engine speced for 0W20.

With the power output density of these modern day engines with Higher Compression Ratios, Direct Injection, Low Speed Pre Ignition problems and higher operating temperatures changing the oil often and running something higher is viscosity than 0W20 engine oil is clearly in my bag of tricks. Changing oil at 50% of the OLM is my recommendation. Some may say this is a waste, but even if your main and rod bearings survive, the roller lifter are NEXT in line to be a problem. This is why clean oil with lower fuel dilution is critical to modern engines. While you can analyze the oil all day long and have it say you can run to 10-15k oil change increments, you are paying $40-$60 for the oil analysis, why not put that money toward more frequent oil changes to keep the engine cleaner and eliminate higher percentage of fuel dilution in the oil.

Also consider something other than the 0W40 Mobil 1 Supercar oil, it is expensive. While there are plenty of other good 0W40 oils on the market that may not be "Officially" Dexos approved, check and see if the oil vendor you like has Dexos approved oils, if they do, they know what is required for Dexos approval but may choose for many reasons not to get their 0W40 approved due to costs, demand and other factors. The main thing the oil needs is a lower Sodium level to help with the reduction of Low Speed Pre Ignition. I am sure you can search and find someone that has performed an oil analysis on non Dexos approved 0W40 and you will be able to see the sodium level. Of buy 1 quart of an oil you would consider using and send a sample for analysis and see what the additive pack values look like. Probably cost you around $50-$65, far less than a full oil change of Mobil 1 Super Car oil.
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,753
Reaction score
2,615
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
So this begs the question for us 5.3L owners....who is going to switch to 0W40?
I would not do this. The 5.3 has had 0-20 for a long time, even previous gen. No evidence of it throwing bearings (likely due to different shift points). 5.3 appears to be quite reliable (other than some lifter issues here and there, bue even then, haven't heard a lot of lifter issues lately).
 

22BlackDenali

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Posts
34
Reaction score
36
@fredtufts

0W20 is adequate and clearly works in most cases. But again 0W20 was developed for better fuel efficiency not necessarily better engine protection. Not many things that offer better fuel economy tend to be durable and long living or help with the overall reliability of the engine or now the automatic transmission with Ultra Low Viscosity automatic transmission fluids.

Part of the problem is the auto manufacturers cannot just change things that the engines/vehicles were certified with by the EPA or even when it comes to safety. In a way I am surprised the EPA allows Remote Starting if they are so worried about fuel economy and emissions!

So based on some SAE research it appears that 0W20 was developed mainly for increases in fuel economy but to try and keep the same basic protection of 5W30. So 5W30 does not have much of a jump in HTHS (High Temp/High Sheer) when compared to 0W20. There is a difference, it is just not much. If you want a jump in HTHS, the next step is 0W40. I have not compared to 10W30, but the problem is so much of today's engines are now "hydraulically" controlled for valvetrain timing and behavior, I feel that the 0 weights are less likely to cause any unusual behavior with the valvetrain control.

As I have stated many times, after running a bunch of data logging on my 2024 6.2l Yukon Denali XL, I found it concerning how often and for how long the engine loading at lower RPM's pushed the engine loads into the 70-100% range while cruising on the highway. 0W20 was able to handle it, but probably in more ideal conditions. Once fuel contaminates any oil, it viscosity and cushioning ability decreases. As an owner/driver, you cannot really tell if and how badly the oil may be fuel contaminated. Fuel contamination of the engine oil is a fact of life more so with Direct Injection engines. It can happen with port injection and turbo engines as well.

Bearing loading and oiling tends to be challenged either with extremely high RPM's or under high engine loading, especially at lower RPM where you are close to lugging the engine. Towing is also an extreme sport, while I have not experimented with the Tow Mode on my truck, I have to assume the TCM (Transmission Control Module) behavior is changed to delay shifting until higher RPM's and to not put the engine under constant heavy loads at lower RPM's. I know from towing with my 2005 6.0l Yukon even an empty enclosed trailer how much the air resistance will load the vehicle. Getting around 10 MPH when towing with anything is not unusual.

I just think the 6.2l with the TCM programming trying to squeeze 21-22 MPG out of 6000 brick is pushing the limits on the oil if it is not 100% fresh. I also think that the 0W20 is more likely to be consumed much quicker than 0W40 and once oil consumption as started, the oil supply is lower, so less cooling, less tolerable to fuel contamination, faster to break down because of just level volume. As a good friend of mine from the EPA used to say all the time, "The solution to pollution is dilution". So you need more oil to dilute the fuel in the sump, less oil in the sump the fuel dilution has a greater impact.

There are cases of small turbo charged Honda engines diluting the oil with so much fuel that there are 1-2 more quarts of oil/fuel mix in the crankcase. Why do these engines not fail at the rate of the 6.2l? I believe it is because the vehicles are much lighter and the engines are not put under extreme Low RPM/High Load conditions under normal driving conditions. Sure the turbo gets hot and needs to be oiled, but at the end of the day, driving a lighter Honda around town and on the highway without putting your foot hard into the throttle probably keeps the engine loading under 50% most of the time.

Totally different animals and operating conditions. We are driving small school buses that the engine rarely operates above 1700 RPM unless accelerating or passing. The higher 3000-4000 RPM's are actually easier on the engine bearings, especially with the 2 stage oil pump where the engine oil pressure jumps to around 70-80 PSI somewhere around 3000-3500 RPM.

I am just not comfortable with anything other that 0W40 in my engine, GM has come out and pretty much indicated there is not a problem running this oil in these engines based on what the Camero and Corvette uses as well as what he NHTSA Recall 25V274 states. I was aware before the Recall was announced that 0W40 would cause no negative effects to pretty much any engine speced for 0W20.

With the power output density of these modern day engines with Higher Compression Ratios, Direct Injection, Low Speed Pre Ignition problems and higher operating temperatures changing the oil often and running something higher is viscosity than 0W20 engine oil is clearly in my bag of tricks. Changing oil at 50% of the OLM is my recommendation. Some may say this is a waste, but even if your main and rod bearings survive, the roller lifter are NEXT in line to be a problem. This is why clean oil with lower fuel dilution is critical to modern engines. While you can analyze the oil all day long and have it say you can run to 10-15k oil change increments, you are paying $40-$60 for the oil analysis, why not put that money toward more frequent oil changes to keep the engine cleaner and eliminate higher percentage of fuel dilution in the oil.

Also consider something other than the 0W40 Mobil 1 Supercar oil, it is expensive. While there are plenty of other good 0W40 oils on the market that may not be "Officially" Dexos approved, check and see if the oil vendor you like has Dexos approved oils, if they do, they know what is required for Dexos approval but may choose for many reasons not to get their 0W40 approved due to costs, demand and other factors. The main thing the oil needs is a lower Sodium level to help with the reduction of Low Speed Pre Ignition. I am sure you can search and find someone that has performed an oil analysis on non Dexos approved 0W40 and you will be able to see the sodium level. Of buy 1 quart of an oil you would consider using and send a sample for analysis and see what the additive pack values look like. Probably cost you around $50-$65, far less than a full oil change of Mobil 1 Super Car oil.
Anyone have a preferred 0W40 other than the super car Mobil 1? Thoughts on Pennzoil ultra platinum?
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,753
Reaction score
2,615
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota
@fredtufts


Also consider something other than the 0W40 Mobil 1 Supercar oil, it is expensive. While there are plenty of other good 0W40 oils on the market that may not be "Officially" Dexos approved, check and see if the oil vendor you like has Dexos approved oils, if they do, they know what is required for Dexos approval but may choose for many reasons not to get their 0W40 approved due to costs, demand and other factors. The main thing the oil needs is a lower Sodium level to help with the reduction of Low Speed Pre Ignition. I am sure you can search and find someone that has performed an oil analysis on non Dexos approved 0W40 and you will be able to see the sodium level. Of buy 1 quart of an oil you would consider using and send a sample for analysis and see what the additive pack values look like. Probably cost you around $50-$65, far less than a full oil change of Mobil 1 Super Car oil.

With all due respect @jfoj, if GM is going to inspect 6.2's, and if they pass, change the oil spec to Dexos 0W40, and extend the warranty on the engine to 10yrs, 150k miles; recommending someone not run the dexos approved oil is setting them up for a disaster if this remedy turns out for GM to be a bad one and a bunch of 6.2's grenade at 95-100-115-120k miles.

"Oh, we told you to use Dexos 0W40; you got your service records?" You respond, "Sure, here they are..." GM says, "Oh, You used AmsOil 0-40, not dexos approved...you didn't follow our instructions."

We know and appreciate your opinion on the oil situation; but I think the odds are there is more to the story. Regardless, we also know that it will be key to follow, at minimum, the engine oil requirements from GM as long as this engine is under warranty. Recommending going outside the Dexos cert is not something I think one should recommend.

My guess is the bulk of the bearing fails are actually due to the "out of tolerance machining" on the crankshaft that GM has admitted to. Think about it, engineer designed the rods and bearings assuming a given diameter of the crank, crank is off by 0.001 or .002 or .003. If it is too tight, can't get enough oil in there, if it is too loose, you are banging the bearings into the crank...either way...eventually a kaboom. The heavier oil would protect against too loose (crank over machined), probably doesn't help much on the too tight...maybe it does...but probably not. This too loose scenario would be exacerbated by the low RPM, High Load situation these motors are operating at in our trucks.
 

viven44

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Posts
397
Reaction score
503
Location
Dallas, TX
So this begs the question for us 5.3L owners....who is going to switch to 0W40?

I have mulled over it, and unfortunately until the vehicle is our of warranty I cannot risk a switch... 0W-30 or 5W-30 once the warranty period is over. We live in Texas, and assuming the thermostat is working well 0W-30 should do a better job than 0W-20 in protecting the bearings when ambient temps are >95F. No doubts there.

I'm probably too data driven and dumb but there isn't a lot of precedence when it comes to 0W-40 use on the 5.3L so I will not be using it.
 

WalleyeMikeIII

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Posts
2,753
Reaction score
2,615
Location
Sunny and Snowy Minnesota

Scarey

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2024
Posts
292
Reaction score
252
I have mulled over it, and unfortunately until the vehicle is our of warranty I cannot risk a switch... 0W-30 or 5W-30 once the warranty period is over. We live in Texas, and assuming the thermostat is working well 0W-30 should do a better job than 0W-20 in protecting the bearings when ambient temps are >95F. No doubts there.

I'm probably too data driven and dumb but there isn't a lot of precedence when it comes to 0W-40 use on the 5.3L so I will not be using it.

Pretty clear to me, OW 40, as per gm recommendation till they sort their mess out.
Sorry, just noticed your 5.3.
 

jfoj

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Posts
1,207
Reaction score
1,065
So this begs the question for us 5.3L owners....who is going to switch to 0W40?
I personally would not think twice about running 0W40 in the 5.3l.

Look at the HP and Torque they are pushing out of any modern V8 along with the high compression ratios. This along with pulling 5-6k+ down the road.

But everyone has their own opinion.
 

blanchard7684

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2024
Posts
442
Reaction score
379
So this begs the question for us 5.3L owners....who is going to switch to 0W40?
If you are towing at max capacity all the time, in hot weather, up hills, combined with extreme idle times or long stop and go routes, and an absolute necessity to go 6,000-7000 miles or more between oil changes then I'd say use 0w40 in a 5.3. So essentially a severe duty application.

Out side of that 5w30 does give you a bit of an additional margin in HTHS.

If you have long highway runs, minimal idling or stop and go, then 0w20 can work but I wouldn't go past 5,000 miles. This is my typical usage and I haven't lost any sleep over using 0w20 in my 5.3 Suburban.

There are a few times when I have to have the SUV idling for more than 30 minutes in hot weather, so I'm gonna use 5w30 in warm weather.

Basically if you keep 0w20 in good to pristine condition via frequent oil changes and your usage outside of a severe duty, then the 5.3 should be good.

Edit:

It is easy to dogpile 0w20 but there are plenty of cases of it working well across many different engines over many years (decade +).

I think concern is warranted when 0w20 is combined with other factors: engine mapping that prioritizes low rpm loading, manufacturing defects (that are survivable with a 0w40), fuel dilution, long oil change intervals.

Victor sheppard put 1 million miles on two different toyota engines with 0w20 and 10,000 mile oil change intervals.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
137,687
Posts
1,989,629
Members
102,689
Latest member
Woned2004
Back
Top