That's why we went with a 2025 F150 Lariat with the 5.0 Coyote and 6.5 foot bed. We were about to pull the trigger on a GMC Sierra 1500 SLT with the 6.2 but multiple poor GMC dealership experiences where their numbers didn't add up, we ended up ordering our F150 via Granger Ford.
In...
Looks like that has changed quickly. They're advertising about 5% off MSRP on 2026 models now in early November. Imagine what it's going to be in 2-4 months if the automotive market continues to soften.
This.
Or GM can allow the car to tether off someone's cell phone and not need to force a subscription on folks. (But there's no $$$ in that.).
Maybe, but I think this question has been somewhat answered by GM already. They backed off the idea of removing CarPlay yet again because they don't...
Also, why does a car have to have its own cellular modem. Why can't it just tether off your mobile phone's connection and thereby not need a subscription service / its own cellular modem? (The answer is obvious... GM wants the subscription revenue.)
Classic Chevy out of DFW has about 90+ Suburbans and 180+ Tahoes in stock. They're advertising almost $11k off MSRP Tahoes and Suburbans.
Eventually, there's going to be geographic market arbitrage.
The bolded text is a bit misleading wouldn't you say. If it were a naturally aspirated I6, I'd agree with you.
But show me any turbocharged diesel I6 that isn't cluttered with some type of plumbing or emissions component around it.
I don't even think someone could make the argument that a...
Really?
I think it's going to be a trade off.
Having owned so many vehicles with packed engine bays with turbocharged engines, it's refreshing to have a NA v8 because it's easier to get to a lot more components without having to deal with all the plumbing of a turbocharged engine. A...
Interesting.
Major volume Chevy dealerships seem to be doing $4000-8000 discounts on their websites.
I think those discounts are only going to get larger going forward as the luster wears off the first refreshed model year.
... the bolded part is my point. I think the failure rate of the 6.2L for all issues (to include issues outside of the bottom end problems such as lifter failures, etc.) is much higher than 3%. Whatever that true number is... that's already a pretty high failure rate for any engine.
I thought the failure rate is 3% which is a pretty high failure rate from this issue alone. Imagine aggregating this failure with all the other types of failures. Wonder what the true failure rate for all cases for the 6.2 would be.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.