Operating system update for e85 compatibility TSB

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
So i stumbled across this TSB for a software update for the Tahoe to improve e85 compatibility. Talked to the local dealership and they said they can do it, but it met the deadline long before i bought the rig. So if i want to do it, i have to pay shop rate for time, about a half hour.

Has anybody here done the update?

20210322_194331.jpg
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Nobody? Well then.. I will be the Guinea pig lol. I plan on taking the Tahoe in next week and having the update done. I will run a few tanks and report back.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Nobody? Well then.. I will be the Guinea pig lol. I plan on taking the Tahoe in next week and having the update done. I will run a few tanks and report back.

Hadn't heard of this but am not on top with things in your generation. These motors do love to run E85, so a 1/2 shop time for the update is not a bad deal. Just make sure your sensor is good or all is for naught. We often burn a mixture in ours, about 16-20%, for best fuel economy and lowest cost to operate.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Hadn't heard of this but am not on top with things in your generation. These motors do love to run E85, so a 1/2 shop time for the update is not a bad deal. Just make sure your sensor is good or all is for naught. We often burn a mixture in ours, about 16-20%, for best fuel economy and lowest cost to operate.
Mine is not a fan of e85, but perhaps that is because it hasnt had the update. On regular 87 it gets 17mpg to 19 mpg on the highway. On e85 the best i can get is 12.5 to 13. And at current prices its not worth it when you work out miles per dollar. I run it occasionally as a fuel system cleaner to flush the injectors but other than that i avoid it. Im hoping the new calibration could help bump it to maybe 14 and it would at least break even since e85 here is only like 10 cents cheaper than regular.
 

Noggles

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2020
Posts
163
Reaction score
150
E85 by nature will always have lower fuel economy even with a proper tune. It takes more of it to burn than regular gasoline does. Its benefits are mostly performance related, if the engine can utilize the higher octane and the cooling effect of ethanol burning, otherwise it's just a cheaper fuel with a lower fuel economy.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Well the dealership finally was able to get the Tahoe in today to do the update. Ill know in a week or so if it did anything to help the mileage with e85
 

Fless

Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Posts
16,278
Reaction score
33,633
Location
People's Republic of Colorado
With a scan tool you may want to monitor what the ethanol content is reading from time to time. If you're running E10 then it shouldn't go above 10% or so.

Curious to know how it goes for you.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Well I cant seem to get it through to my wife to use only e85 when she fills up so i can see how the new program does.

However, on a straight dose of 87 octane she seems to do much better.
Getting 20 mpg at 70 miles per hour.
So thats a solid 1 mpg above where it was before, and that was pulling a slight (almost negligible) uphill grade.


If i can get a solid full tank of e85 for 2 weeks ill get back with that info.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Knocked down 19.2 mpg running 75-80mph from Peoria il to Davenport ia. Conditions were 72ish degrees and a steady rain. This is on straight 87. Still cant manage to get my wife to use the YELLOW handle to fill the tank, even with the post-it note on the dashboard. However 19.2 at 75-80 is better than the previous long trip i took with the old factory calibration which was 17.9 running 75-80.
If i can ever get a full couple weeks of e85 i will report on that as well
 

rockola1971

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Posts
2,862
Reaction score
4,083
Location
Indiana (formerly IL)
I only use e85 to clean my fuel system once in awhile. Otherwise its false economy to use it. It literally costs more per mile to drive using e85 vs 87 octane. Science cant be defeated and science shows that ethanol has a lower BTU output than 87 octane. So it takes more of e85 to drive the same amount of mileage using 87 octane. While E85 is cheaper per gallon you simply dont get the same amount of mileage using 87 octane.
 

S33k3r

Elite Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2017
Posts
2,848
Reaction score
4,091
Location
Dallas, Texas
I only use e85 to clean my fuel system once in awhile. Otherwise its false economy to use it. It literally costs more per mile to drive using e85 vs 87 octane. Science cant be defeated and science shows that ethanol has a lower BTU output than 87 octane. So it takes more of e85 to drive the same amount of mileage using 87 octane. While E85 is cheaper per gallon you simply dont get the same amount of mileage using 87 octane.
It just depends on how much cheaper the e85 is than regular. At some point, the e85 may be cheaper. But don't forget to factor the value of your time when you make the extra stops to fuel up, and/or only fueling up at stations with e85.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
I only use e85 to clean my fuel system once in awhile. Otherwise its false economy to use it. It literally costs more per mile to drive using e85 vs 87 octane. Science cant be defeated and science shows that ethanol has a lower BTU output than 87 octane. So it takes more of e85 to drive the same amount of mileage using 87 octane. While E85 is cheaper per gallon you simply dont get the same amount of mileage using 87 octane.
True i fully believe and know that as someone whom used to use e85 as a "race fuel " . It's been 12 years or better, but if i remember close to right... it took 60 or 65 percent more e85 than c16 to make the same power(1016 hp at the wheels) . We actually ran out of fuel flow at the carb and put a boost referenced nozzle in front of the turbo to help supply fuel.
It just depends on how much cheaper the e85 is than regular. At some point, the e85 may be cheaper. But don't forget to factor the value of your time when you make the extra stops to fuel up, and/or only fueling up at stations with e85.
This is where it comes into play. It is 35 cents cheaper in my town. Almost close enough to call it, if i could use it for a long trip. But short trip driving it doesnt make sense to use.
 

rockola1971

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Posts
2,862
Reaction score
4,083
Location
Indiana (formerly IL)
It just depends on how much cheaper the e85 is than regular. At some point, the e85 may be cheaper. But don't forget to factor the value of your time when you make the extra stops to fuel up, and/or only fueling up at stations with e85.
And there lies the problem. Ive never seen E85 around here cheap enough that it is actually cheaper to drive on vs 87 Octane. The rough numbers are that you will lose 15-20% fuel economy using E85 vs using 87octane. The engine simply requires more e85 to do the same amount of work it would using 87octane. The proof is laying right in any flex fuel intake manifold. Have a look at the part numbers for say a 2003 Chevy Tahoe 5.3L vin Z (Flex fuel) and you will see the fuel injector part numbers are different from a 2003 non flex fuel 5.3L. Why is that? Because the FFV Injectors are larger and have a higher flow rate to add that extra e85 required to do the same amount of work that 87 octane would do.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
21,276
Reaction score
30,208
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
1626782738578.png

1626782789576.png


You fellas might consider running a mix for better fuel economy. Mine gets better mpgs with an alcohol content of between 16-20% or so compared with 93 octane gas. I do not ever intentionally burn straight 87 gasoline.

You can see the percentage difference also between burning the differing fuels. It's not as bad as some think.
 
OP
OP
Mudsport96

Mudsport96

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Posts
1,420
Reaction score
2,330
Location
40.923,-89.488. Illinois
Here's where we're at with the Sierra so far:

View attachment 345304

In this truck, the difference between burning 93 and any mix of Ethanol is even less so far.
Ive noticed, my old 95 ford even does better on the local 15 percent thats like 89 octane. Now, it shouldn't be possible.. but my untested guess is that at 300k miles it has significant buildup in the chambers. This causes spark knock that i have heard on occasions. Thus the knock sensor pulls timing and mileage suffers. The higher octane resists the knock timing stays optimal and mileage goes back up.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,688
Posts
1,989,638
Members
102,689
Latest member
Woned2004
Back
Top