Looking at 2011 Yukon Denali

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
W

WillEngineer

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Posts
17
Reaction score
6
So another point, I did show the video to my father-in-law who has a solid knowledge of engines. His comment was "sounds like lifters, definitely valve train".
 
OP
OP
W

WillEngineer

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Posts
17
Reaction score
6
I guess I'm naive on pushrod issues and idiosyncrasies.

I've been in one guys Chevy truck that had a lifter sound...this sounded like 10x that noise.
 

swathdiver

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Posts
19,100
Reaction score
25,031
Location
Treasure Coast, Florida
Go at it slow so you're not wasting money. I bet it was lifter failure due to low oil and pressure but listen to your FIL, here's there and I'm here in my chair. Them 5.4 Fords have no power, spin lots of rpms and have no torque. Had two '99 stake bed 1-tons, one Ford, one Chevy. The cab in the Ford was bigger so I would drive it more often. It had less power, less gas mileage than the old 350 small block chevy and rode like a Mack. May not be so bad in a 1/2 ton PU though, idk, it's a Ford. Old school Fords were great motors, almost as good as GM! Went downhill after that IMO!

Once you tear into this motor, convert it to L9H by deleting AFM and having BlackBear tune the engine and transmission computers. You'll then have a 400+ horsepower hot rod truck that can 7 or 8 around in luxury and turn 14s at the drag strip.
 
OP
OP
W

WillEngineer

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Posts
17
Reaction score
6
Well, the price is the next thing. I have to assume the cost of a full rebuild when I give a bid.

Having just done the Ford 5.4, I have a clue what I'm up against there.

KBB seems to about $11,500 for a good example with 172,000. His initial offer is $7800 obo.
 

Charles Land

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Posts
23
Reaction score
12
Some more specifics, like what symptoms the Denali has, would make it easier to give better answers.

Over all the LS engines are pretty reliable.

The Denali will have the 6.2L and 6L80E 6 speed transmission.

Being that it's a 2011 it will have AFM/DOD (active fuel management/displacement on demand) which is known to be problematic if frequent oil changes are not done.

A cam and lifter swap to NON-AFM components is the best way to fix this and avoid future problems but it does require pulling the heads and reprogramming the ECM to turn off AFM.

If it has low oil pressure then it is a good possibility that it just needs a new O-ring on the oil pickup tube.

I would suggest taking a bluetooth OBD2 reader with you, if you have one, so you can check for potential codes that might give you additional info about the problem.

Once you go look at it, post up some more info on here and maybe we can give you some better insight.


All ogod advice. We have a 2011 Denali xl with 205,000 miles. Engine runs a little hot when towing, but hasn't been a problem. Trannys seem to be the weak point. Had to overhaul at 140k. My experience with Suburbans is to plan on a tranny overhaul every 100 to 150k. Going price for a tranny overhaul $2k to $2.5k. We have had to do work on suspension - replace compressor and rear air shocks. There is just a lot of stuff on this vehicle to keep working. You and Rock Auto will be best of friends.
 

91RS

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Posts
2,447
Reaction score
1,801
Location
GA
I would plan on putting in a used L92 or L9H engine from an 07-10 that never came with AFM. I'd bet money it has lifter failure but no oil on the dipstick means it also has oil consumption from stuck piston rings. Unless you planned on modifying it, the time you'll safe from not having to rebuild the engine is worth a little extra cost (and after you buy all the parts it may not even be that much more). Plus, the old engine is still worth something because it's a 6.2L and it's desirable.

The main thing to consider in this case is how much other stuff does the truck need? At 170k+ miles the suspension will be tired and the mag ride shocks are expensive, ball joints and bushings could be worn, etc. Interior pieces aren't cheap either like the common cracked dash, console lid, steering wheel (the wood falls off when people pick at them), etc. If you don't care about any of that then I guess you don't have to worry about it but I'm a perfectionist.
 

petethepug

Michael
Joined
May 4, 2016
Posts
2,275
Reaction score
2,220
Location
SoCal
Didn’t see the year of the 6.0 you were looking over & assume they were all 4x2. 05 Eddie B would be the top pic. Earlier models had know issues involving the heads, studs and coolant contamination from casting sand left in the block.

The 11 Denali is susceptible to infrequent oil changes leaving the cyl fuel control (AFM) prone to failure. The Denali will be AWD or 2WD with that lovely 400+ hp 6.2 and possibly be loaded with features. Is it XL?

The 6.0 motor will need a good local mechanic to advise of proper service and diagnostic. Without it, it’s a crap shoot. The MPG factor will be slightly higher but you’ll walk to the rhythmic beat of fuel quality weariness and absolute maintenance schedules. The motor may be at end of life as 20 years is fast approaching them. It’s got room if you need it but you will not have the Cadillac ride of the Denali.

The 6SP o/d in the Denali is tried, true and it loves to handle the hp/tq of the 6.2. It handles towing well and with regular tows an updated trans cooler is wise.

I [emoji3590] oil burners, but when they go south, your married to an investment that’s hard to recoup. If it’s for family and towing, get the Denali. It’s turning radius, features, quieter, better ride is superior and the wifey will want to drive it. I’d rather spend the additional dough on the AWD maint portion of a Denali w/ a crate motor vs known Diesel issues on an older truck.

Lastly, three kids. The 3rd row on the Denali was either fought over to get or avoid. It’s not as comfortable as the 2nd row bench seat. The bench seat is not as comfy as the front row captains chairs. The ideal set up is 1st & 2nd row capt chairs for ez access to 3rd row and comfort. There’s a slim chance it may have 1st or 2nd row a/c seats. We have the XL bench on our 08 Denali. The girls usually fall over and sleep on long trips while my 6’3” son sprawled across the entire 3rd row with a blanket and iPhone.

Bring your kiddos to see what they like best for comfort on both. Happy wife (+ kids) is happy life [emoji4]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
W

WillEngineer

TYF Newbie
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Posts
17
Reaction score
6
Didn’t see the year of the 6.0 you were looking over & assume they were all 4x2. 05 Eddie B would be the top pic. Earlier models had know issues involving the heads, studs and coolant contamination from casting sand left in the block.

The 11 Denali is susceptible to infrequent oil changes leaving the cyl fuel control (AFM) prone to failure. The Denali will be AWD or 2WD with that lovely 400+ hp 6.2 and possibly be loaded with features. Is it XL?

The 6.0 motor will need a good local mechanic to advise of proper service and diagnostic. Without it, it’s a crap shoot. The MPG factor will be slightly higher but you’ll walk to the rhythmic beat of fuel quality weariness and absolute maintenance schedules. The motor may be at end of life as 20 years is fast approaching them. It’s got room if you need it but you will not have the Cadillac ride of the Denali.

The 6SP o/d in the Denali is tried, true and it loves to handle the hp/tq of the 6.2. It handles towing well and with regular tows an updated trans cooler is wise.

I [emoji3590] oil burners, but when they go south, your married to an investment that’s hard to recoup. If it’s for family and towing, get the Denali. It’s turning radius, features, quieter, better ride is superior and the wifey will want to drive it. I’d rather spend the additional dough on the AWD maint portion of a Denali w/ a crate motor vs known Diesel issues on an older truck.

Lastly, three kids. The 3rd row on the Denali was either fought over to get or avoid. It’s not as comfortable as the 2nd row bench seat. The bench seat is not as comfy as the front row captains chairs. The ideal set up is 1st & 2nd row capt chairs for ez access to 3rd row and comfort. There’s a slim chance it may have 1st or 2nd row a/c seats. We have the XL bench on our 08 Denali. The girls usually fall over and sleep on long trips while my 6’3” son sprawled across the entire 3rd row with a blanket and iPhone.

Bring your kiddos to see what they like best for comfort on both. Happy wife (+ kids) is happy life [emoji4]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


The Denali is not an XL and it is AWD.

My towing needs would likely max out at 6000 lbs. My F150 can also handle that if need be....if I were towing something by myself I almost certainly would use the F150.

The biggest demerit against the Excursion right now to me is the fact that the most straightforward way to pull the engine is to take the cab off, and I don't have a lift to do that. So pulling the engine would get complicated.

Regarding the Denali, it really isn't drive-able more than a few mph, so testing the shocks and transmission are not really in the cards. I suppose I could ask the answer for any maintenance done on both of those items as he has owned it since new.

I went back and looked at the pics I took when I went and saw it. Although I wasn't looking for flaking steering wheels or cracking dashboards, I can't see any evidence of such in the pics and videos. This is Arizona we are talking about here, so I also didn't see any evidence of any clear coat issues or leather cracking (biggies in Phoenix). The exterior color is some sort of white pearl.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
128,790
Posts
1,805,498
Members
91,773
Latest member
wbhidalgo17
Top