Leveling Questions 16 Hoe

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

BradzTahoeStuff

TYF Newbie
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Posts
11
Reaction score
1
Been reading out here and talked to a couple of shops. My LT has 22z and the HD Towing Kit with the air bag thingy in the back. Need to confirm, but don't think it has the magnetic ride control and off the top of my head 285/55 tires..... So:

How do folks decide how much to level? Before after photos out here suggest that 2 to 2.5" is about right.

Some kits for the front leveling adjust at the top and bottom (Suspension Maxx) while others only adjust at the top (ProComp) so is there a significant difference? Any risk one way or the other to the CV joint / shaft?

Any particular brands to stay away from or pursue?

While they are at it I'm thinking of upgrading rotors and pads up front only, for now, since I tow a decent sized boat regularly.

Feedback on EBC Stage 3 or PowerStop for the rotors and pad kits?

Does $250 for both in labor seem reasonable and is an alignment 100% necessary after leveling?

Thanks in advance for your responses that help a Newb.
 

2016YUKONSLT

Full Access Member
Joined
May 24, 2016
Posts
245
Reaction score
60
Rough country makes a kit to level the front for $50. IIRC, it is a 1" increase in the front.
 

jake calvin

TYF Newbie
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Posts
19
Reaction score
26
Bilstein 5100 shocks all around in mine. The front are ride height adjustable up to 2.5". I have mine set at 2.5". They do not compromise the suspension or ride at all like other leveling kits and is relatively cheap....

IMG_0563.JPG


IMG_0564.JPG
 
Last edited:

cmatt

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Posts
637
Reaction score
701
What's the part number to the front Bilsteins you have?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

01Konvict

Boats n Hoes
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Posts
2,747
Reaction score
707
Location
Raleigh/SML
No difference in top or bottom spacers except bottom is easier to install but can't go over 2" or it will contact the cv.

Bilsteins look up on a few websites such as shock warehouse or bilstein for part numbers.
 

danimal12

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 26, 2017
Posts
2
Reaction score
0
Interested in the Bilstiens adjustable part numbers, they show not to make them on the site for 2015+. I know a buddy has them on a Silverado so I would guess not much difference.
 

DWTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Posts
203
Reaction score
91
Location
Colorado
I find the 2" to 2.5" are very level, bordering on making the front a little high at times. I didn't want that, so I went with the 1.5". I really like the idea of the Bilstiens and being able to dial in exactly the height you want. I'll probably go that route when I need shocks but it's hard to beat the price of the spacers when the shocks aren't worn out.
 

Texas70

Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Posts
41
Reaction score
21
I find the 2" to 2.5" are very level, bordering on making the front a little high at times. I didn't want that, so I went with the 1.5". I really like the idea of the Bilstiens and being able to dial in exactly the height you want. I'll probably go that route when I need shocks but it's hard to beat the price of the spacers when the shocks aren't worn out.
Which leveling kit did you use & do you have any side pics? Planning on leveling mine soon, trying to decide between the 1.5" or the 2".
 

DWTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Posts
203
Reaction score
91
Location
Colorado
I'll see if i can get any side pics on a level spot. I have the Suspension Maxx 1.5". I also have the Max trailering pkg with the rear load leveling. You can get the 2" spacers cheaper than the 1.5" so that sort of sucks, but I knew I never wanted the front higher than the rear.

And for me the alignment was required after the spacers.

image1.JPG
 
Last edited:

Texas70

Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Posts
41
Reaction score
21
I'll see if i can get any side pics on a level spot. I have the Suspension Maxx 1.5". I also have the Max trailering pkg with the rear load leveling. You can get the 2" spacers cheaper than the 1.5" so that sort of sucks, but I knew I never wanted the front higher than the rear.

And for me the alignment was required after the spacers.

View attachment 81952
Thanks for the pic and info! I agree, I don't want the front higher than the rear either. Nice ride btw!
 

Glocksub

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Posts
129
Reaction score
73
I'll see if i can get any side pics on a level spot. I have the Suspension Maxx 1.5". I also have the Max trailering pkg with the rear load leveling. You can get the 2" spacers cheaper than the 1.5" so that sort of sucks, but I knew I never wanted the front higher than the rear.

And for me the alignment was required after the spacers.

View attachment 81952

Your Tahoe looks great with the 1.5". Are you running the stock 275/55-20's or a size larger? For some reason the tires look a little larger than stock, but maybe it's just me....
 

DWTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Posts
203
Reaction score
91
Location
Colorado
Mine are the stock size. 275/55r20. They are Hankook AT-M tires. They are an all terrain but not as beefy as the BFG's or anything like that.
 

Glocksub

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Posts
129
Reaction score
73
Mine are the stock size. 275/55r20. They are Hankook AT-M tires. They are an all terrain but not as beefy as the BFG's or anything like that.

Thanks for the info. Prior to seeing your photo, I was pretty much set in my mind on a 2in leveling kit. The 1.5 is certainly a noticeable difference from stock while not bordering on too high in the front.....that being said, the two inch does not appear nose high when the truck is empty, but it's so close that it makes me think I would not like the stance if there was any weight in the cargo area or a trailer hooked to the vehicle.
 

DWTahoe

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Posts
203
Reaction score
91
Location
Colorado
I also have the max trailering pkg (rear load leveling). If you have that it may keep it from sagging and the 2" may work well for you.
 

Glocksub

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Posts
129
Reaction score
73
I also have the max trailering pkg (rear load leveling). If you have that it may keep it from sagging and the 2" may work well for you.

I'm not going to purchase one that does not have the max trailer pkg, but I'm wondering how the rear load leveling will act (or compensate) for any weight when the front is already 2" higher than stock....in other words, if the front is already 2" higher and weight is put on the rear, will the rear load leveling system still work well enough to eliminate all of the sag?
 
Last edited:

AZCreeker

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Posts
382
Reaction score
253
Bilstein 5100 shocks all around in mine. The front are ride height adjustable up to 2.5". I have mine set at 2.5". They do not compromise the suspension or ride at all like other leveling kits and is relatively cheap....

View attachment 73028

View attachment 73029

Would you mind sharing the part number for these bilstein and any other supporting parts that you used to make it as pictured?
Also, would you say that the ride is more controlled, more confortable over bad roads than the stock setup.
I have 45k on my suburban and trying to decided what is the most solid route to possibly to a small lift front and back. I want to keep the rear a bit higher due to the slanted nature of the rear of the suburban
( currently have the suburban leveled rear with the stock front, so probably lowered 3" and my wife doesnt like it at all, cargo hatch to low, rear cargo slanted down and stuff keeps falling, plus look wise although its perfectly levelled, rear looks droppy due to the design of the rear)
 

ckeller04

TYF Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Posts
9
Reaction score
6
I got 2.5 in the front and nothing on the back. Front def higher. Wish i would have seen this post before. So i'm assuming if i put a 1" block in back it will level it. is this normal?

IMG_7314 (1).PNG
 

Forum statistics

Threads
137,691
Posts
1,989,699
Members
102,690
Latest member
RobK

Latest posts

Back
Top